Drunk money

Politics + Other Mistakes
By AL DIAMON  |  September 19, 2012

The Bangor Daily News recently asked its readers in an online poll, "Do you travel to New Hampshire to purchase liquor?" The unscientific results: 42 percent said yes, while 58 percent checked no.

From this, we can conclude that 58 percent of the respondents are liars.

In reality, virtually all Mainers who drink hard stuff buy at least some of their supply in our neighboring state, where the prices are drastically lower. Only a complete clunkhead would do otherwise.

Just check out the deals.

In Maine, a 1.75 liter bottle of Absolut vodka retails for $34.99. In New Hampshire, it's $24.99. That ten-spot should more than cover gas and tolls.

Maine regularly sells a 1.75 liter bottle of The Famous Grouse Scotch for $43.99, but it's on special in September for a mere $37.99. Of course, New Hampshire has a deal, too. Instead of the usual $39.99 (four bucks cheaper than Maine), it's going for $30.99 (seven bucks cheaper).

While you're next door, you might want to pick up some Jameson Irish whiskey, as well. Maine's sale price of $22.99 for a 750 ml bottle (regularly $25.99) isn't bad, but New Hampshire has the same thing for $19.99 (regularly $24.99).

But don't take my word that shopping across the border is a bargain. Here's what state Bureau of Alcoholic Beverages and Lottery Operations director Gerry Reid told the Legislature's Appropriations Committee earlier this month:

"Our consumers in the state of Maine today do not get a good deal, and that is costing us business."

Reid said Maine loses $10 million to $20 million a year in sales to its rival, a figure that may be seriously low-balled. A New Hampshire official told me last year that his state estimates Maine consumers are worth $20 million a year in profit.

Not sales. Profit.

Reid has a plan to recapture some of that money by lowering prices, so Maine would be only a little more expensive than New Hampshire, instead of ridiculously so. That makes sense.

He'd accomplish that by changing the way this state handles wholesale liquor distribution. That also makes sense.

Unfortunately, he would retain state control over both wholesale and retail prices, and ban anything remotely resembling competition. That makes no sense.

Right now, wholesale booze in this state is controlled by one business, Maine Beverage Co., which is principally owned by the Martignetti Cos. of Massachusetts. You might think Martignetti would be a strong advocate for lower prices to increase its sales, but you'd be wrong. Since Martignetti also supplies New Hampshire with much of its bottled alcohol, it doesn't really care where you buy your hooch.

Maine Beverage paid the state $125 million upfront in 2004 to win that contract. Since then, its annual profit has been about $36 million, so, over the life of the 10-year deal, it will realize nearly a 200 percent return on its investment.

Or to put it another way, Maine Beverage took Maine's suckers (translation: taxpayers) to the cleaners.

Reid is promising to fix all that. He wants to negotiate a new decade-long contract with either Maine Beverage or another slick operator that would return as much as $13 million a year in extra cash to the state. Part of that increase would be accomplished by making the next deal less lucrative for the wholesaler, and part would be the result of lowering prices so the percentage of Mainers who travel to New Hampshire for the makings of their favorite cocktails looks more like the results of that newspaper poll.

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Politics, New Hampshire, Maine,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BETWEEN THE DYING AND THE DEAD  |  July 11, 2014
    Being politically deceased, you’d think Steve Woods would give us a break by putting on a dark suit, lying down in a coffin, and closing his eyes.
  •   ALL THE WRONG CHOICES  |  July 07, 2014
    Reform is in the air. Olympia Snowe and the Portland Press Herald are calling for changes in the way we elect our leaders in order to restore public confidence, end gridlock, and reverse global warming. There’s a much better chance they’ll accomplish that last one than either of the other two.  
  •   INSIDE GAME  |  June 25, 2014
    The university system’s decision to add Demeritt to its roster at a salary of $125,000 a year generated criticism because it was done by ignoring normal hiring procedures and came at a time when the system is facing budget shortfalls, program cuts, and layoffs. Demeritt is going to have to hit a lot of three-pointers to make up for all that negative reaction.
  •   WHICH WAY DO I TURN?  |  June 18, 2014
    Bruce Poliquin has a big problem.
    LePage would prefer you withhold judgment on those actions that didn’t work out quite the way he planned. Or, possibly, didn’t plan.

 See all articles by: AL DIAMON