The price you pay(1)

Politics + other mistakes
By AL DIAMON  |  May 3, 2013

Want to pay less in taxes? Start by paying more.

I know, that reads like a line from the Democratic Party's state platform, but it's not. In fact, it's a concept supported by, among others, Republican Governor Paul LePage.

Right there, the idea runs into trouble, because as far as lots of Mainers are concerned, if LePage is in favor of it, they're against it. So let me hasten to add that this proposal is also backed by independent US Senator Angus King, Democratic US Representative Chellie Pingree, and large segments of the business community. In fact, the only ones opposing it are the Maine Heritage Policy Center (motto: No — To Everything), some New Hampshire politicians (motto: Live Free — Off Out-Of-State Liquor Sales) and my friend Culpepper (motto: Screw That).

The policy center's position is easy to understand. It believes more taxes — on anything, for any reason — are bad. Period.

New Hampshire's stand is consistent with its opposition to any tax except an excessive one on property.

And Culpepper (a real person, but not a real name) isn't buying into this deal, because, as a small businessman in rural Maine, he's spent years figuring out ways not to pay the taxes he owes.

Which makes him part of the problem.

Culpepper and the rest of the state's cash-only, underground economy don't contribute their share of sales and income taxes, so the rest of us have to pay more. By the rest of us, I don't actually mean me, because I regularly buy taxable stuff from Culpepper on which no tax is charged. He in turn neglects to include that transaction on his income tax form. And everybody's happy. Except for those of you who have to cough up a little extra to make up for Culpepper and me cutting corners.

If we all acted in strict accordance with the state's tax laws, the government would take in so much additional income there'd be no budget shortfall, no need to cut off revenue sharing to cities and towns, no plans to shift education costs to local school districts, no problem paying back the debt owed to hospitals, and no reason not to expand Medicaid. In other words, those piffle-headed excuses for noxious bacteria that run Augusta would spend every penny of it. And more.

By paying more in taxes, we'd end up paying . . . more. Because nobody, except possibly LePage, would actually advocate using that extra money to lower income-tax rates or reduce the percentage we pay in sales tax.

As we should have known, there's no cash reward for being more honest. And if there were, it would be taxed.

Which brings us back to the idea I hinted at above. Congress is currently considering a bill that would require online retailers who do at least $1 million in business annually to collect sales taxes from all their customers. If it passes, it means that every time you buy something from Amazon.com or eBay, you'll be charged the same 5 percent tax you'd have to pay if you bought the identical item at a store in Maine.

1  |  2  |   next >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Angus King, Paul Lepage
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY AL DIAMON
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   TAKE THE GAMBLE  |  September 19, 2014
    Governments need stuff to regulate. Otherwise, we wouldn’t need governments.  
  •   THE E.C. PLAN  |  September 12, 2014
    Independent gubernatorial candidate Eliot Cutler has proposed a much-needed change in the way Maine chooses its governor. Under the Cutler plan, the only people allowed to run would be those with the initials E.C.  
  •   PIMPING AND PANDERING  |  September 03, 2014
    And so, the excitement of the fall political campaigns begins.  
  •   BEAR WITH ME  |  August 31, 2014
    It’s the fall of 2015. A bear walks into a doughnut shop in Portland and says, “Give me two dozen assorted to go.”  
  •   LOOK OUT, CLEVELAND  |  August 21, 2014
    Eric Brakey is an energetic guy. But as an admirer of sloth, I have intense disdain for the excessively active.  

 See all articles by: AL DIAMON