Got Choice?

Bush’s reign marks a troubling time for abortion supporters
By MARY ANN SORRENTINO  |  January 19, 2006

I hope for the day when my daughter and granddaughter will never have to write — or read — columns like this one. I hope for silence on every future January 22, the anniversary of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that made legal and safe abortions the national standard. For the last 33 years, however, annual reminders that the rights granted by Roe are always under threatening attack seemed necessary.

This year, under the anti-choice rule of George W. Bush and with the giant question mark posed by Samuel Alito hanging over our heads there is, unfortunately, no less need for concern.

What pro-choice advocates dream of is a day when the nation would accept women’s privacy as a fact that need not be endlessly debated. Whether others agree with the abortion option or not, those of us who do look forward to a time when a truce can be declared and the reality of abortion choices accepted.

People oppose divorce, others still detest interracial marriages, and some even hate the idea that consenting adults may privately engage in sexual tangles other than the missionary position. But the din that such legal activities used to raise has died down to a manageable whisper. None of these once-controversial topics has the power to greatly influence public policy in 2006.

Yet the most private, and the most painful, decision a woman can face has become the pivotal issue for electing presidents, confirming judges, or even electing governors and city councilors who have no legislative power over Roe.

What the abortion debate lacks is perspective from the point of view of those who oppose it. The options being weighed by any woman facing an unintended pregnancy ought to be of maximum urgency to her, and anyone else in whom she cares to confide.

Beyond that intensely private circle, there should be silence, since no one else’s opinion really has any standing and just creates background noise.

This year, on January 22, remembering the many women who lost their health and lives in the days before Roe gave them safer options, that is all we hope for: silence, privacy, and freedom.

  Topics: This Just In , George W. Bush, Abortion, Samuel Alito
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY MARY ANN SORRENTINO
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FERRARO, A PHOTO, AND A LEGACY  |  March 30, 2011
    Geraldine Ferraro's photograph stands proudly in a silver frame, inscribed to my daughter with the words, "You are my hero."
  •   TWO MURDERS AND AN UNHEEDED CALL  |  December 29, 2010
    When Rhode Islanders mention former Rhode Island Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Fay, they often focus on the scandal that forced him to resign from the bench.
  •   THE DEATH OF IRISH-ITALIAN POLITICAL ENTITLEMENT  |  September 22, 2010
    Angel Taveras may soon be Providence’s first Latino mayor. But his victory in the recent Democratic primary is much more than a triumph of the city’s growing Hispanic population.
  •   RHODE ISLAND’S BIRTH CONTROL CONTRETEMPS  |  July 07, 2010
    Recently OB-GYN Associates, a respected women's health care practice with offices in Rhode Island and Massachusetts, admitted to Rhode Island Department of Health officials that it had implanted in patients birth control intrauterine devices (IUDs) apparently manufactured in Canada and not approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
  •   TURNING IN THAT LOW-NUMBERED PLATE FOR A PINK ONE  |  May 19, 2010
    Low-numbered plates may be Valhalla for Rhode Island’s vainglorious. But they are hard to come by. So for the average driver looking for attention, “vanity” and “special category” plates are the way to go.

 See all articles by: MARY ANN SORRENTINO