The real anti-Hillary stands up

By ADAM REILLY  |  August 27, 2008

Then, too, there’s the matter of Edwards’s wife, Elizabeth, who was diagnosed with breast cancer the day after the 2004 presidential election. During his New Hampshire swing, Edwards started his speeches by announcing that Elizabeth was recently declared cancer-free. His audiences — particularly the women — responded with beaming smiles and applause. During the ’04 campaign, one woman I know was impressed by Edwards’s obvious attachment to Elizabeth, who, though not unattractive, can’t match her husband in the good-looks department. A few days ago, I told my mother that I’d seen Edwards in New Hampshire, and that he’d relayed Elizabeth’s prognosis. Her response: “She seems like such a sweet woman!” Simply put, Elizabeth Edwards — and John Edwards’s relationship with her — will be a major asset as John Edwards tries to wrest the Democratic nomination from Hillary Clinton. It’s surely no accident that Saving Graces: Finding Solace and Strength from Friends and Strangers, Elizabeth’s memoir, is slated for publication this September.

Unpredictable you
The New Hampsherites who caught Edwards’s act last weekend weren’t ready to anoint him the permanent anti-Hillary just yet. “I think he’s a very attractive candidate; I think he’s very articulate,” one man said at a fundraiser in Cornish, near the Vermont border. “The second time around is harder than the first time around. He was part of the losing team. I don’t think it’s a major thing, but it is a negative.” At the same event, a second skeptic called Edwards’s fixation on poverty commendable but politically dubious, and suggested he might be a good Secretary of Health and Human Services. (When I asked Edwards about Americans’ apparent apathy about poverty in their midst, he had this to say: “I don’t think it’s an indication of disinterest. The best evidence of that, I think, is when the hurricane hit New Orleans, the government was a mess, but the country wasn’t. The American people volunteered, took families into their community, made huge contributions. I think it’s a leadership question: somebody has to ask the country to be patriotic and to act outside their own self-interest.”)

Then again, no one seemed to be sold on Hillary, either. Marion Copenhaver, another acerbic Yankee and ex–New Hampshire state representative, warned that other women resent Hillary’s intelligence. And the same guy who thought the Kerry-Edwards loss in ’04 could hurt Edwards’s chances in ’08 professed grave doubts about Clinton’s electability. “I think if Hillary wants to run, she’ll probably get the nomination,” he said. In the general election, though, “I don’t think she can do it. But does that mean I shouldn’t support her? I don’t know.”

Comments like this, which come even from professed admirers of the former first lady, suggest the anti-Hillary trope is here to stay. The 2008 primary season is still a year and a half away, of course, and there’s no guarantee Edwards will be called on to play that particular part. But for a host of reasons, he may be the Democratic rival Hillary most needs to fear.

On the Web
Adam Reilly's Talking Politics:
John Edwards's One America Committee:
Letter from Senator Hillary Clinton to constituents on Iraq policy:
"Hillary's new haters":,lombardi,70931,6.html
UNC's Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity:

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  | 
Related: The shape of things to come, Suffrage net city, Slime time, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Edward M. Kennedy, U.S. Republican Party, John Edwards (Politician),  More more >
| More

Most Popular
More Information
The anti-McCain
Since the socially conservative John McCain makes many Republicans nervous, a gay-friendly abortion supporter like Rudy Giuliani should make them downright apoplectic. Improbably, though, McCain and Giuliani may be the two Republicans with the best shot at beating Hillary Clinton in a presidential race — and Giuliani currently looks like the stronger of the two. In a June Gallup poll, Giuliani was the prospective ’08 candidate most palatable to Republican voters: 73 percent called him “acceptable,” compared to just 55 percent for the senator from Arizona.
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY