The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
WFNX_1000x50g

Who might need - and get - a pardon?

Legal advisers, high-level officials, covert operatives
By HARVEY SILVERGLATE  |  August 17, 2006

060818_coverts_main
To date, there are at least 600 covert operatives who may find themselves in need of a pardon
Abuse of prisoners and detainees by US personnel has occurred, at the very least, at three overseas sites: Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad, in Iraq; Guantánamo Bay, in Cuba; and Bagram Air Base, in Afghanistan. As of April, more than 330 cases have surfaced in which US military and civilian personnel are alleged to have abused, tortured, or killed detainees, implicating more than 600 US personnel and involving more than 460 detainees.

We still do not know how widespread, severe, and systemic the abuse was. Thanks to the Washington Post’s Dana Priest’s pioneering reporting, the public learned last November that the US government is operating a “covert prison system set up by the CIA nearly four years ago that at various times has included sites in eight countries, including Thailand, Afghanistan and several democracies in Eastern Europe.” But what exactly has transpired at these sites remains unclear. Nor do we know what transpired during the first few years at Guantánamo Bay, since US officials wouldn’t let lawyers or human-rights advocates survey the facility until 2004 — more than two years after the detention facility opened — after the Supreme Court ruled that inmates have the right to receive visits from their lawyers.

So far, only lower-echelon military personnel and one civilian contractor have been charged with abuse-related offenses, all committed at Abu Ghraib. Yet federal prosecutors have numerous resources at their disposal to uncover what happened, and to work their way up the ladder toward prosecution of any of the president’s men responsible for allowing the military and intelligence services to step outside the traditional laws of war.

Related: Republican dirty tricks, Criminalizing the war, Resolution of the Maine Democratic State Committee, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Politics, Criminal Sentencing and Punishment, Prisons,  More more >
| More

ARTICLES BY HARVEY SILVERGLATE
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   TAKING THE PLEDGE IN BROOKLINE  |  September 13, 2011
    Freedom Watch
  •   A LIBERTARIAN'S VIEW OF THE BARSTOOL/BRADY CHILD-PORN FIASCO  |  August 25, 2011
    Sophisticated First Amendment scholars, lawyers, and media commentators, all of whom are strongly free-speech/free-press supporters, were critical of Coakley for allegedly engaging in a legal bluff — the veiled threat of possible prosecution under the state's child-porn statute — to convince Portnoy to remove the offending and exploitative image from his site.
  •   HOW THE ARROYO JURY GOT IT RIGHT  |  August 25, 2011
    Rarely has a Boston jury had to suffer as much ridicule as the 12 citizens who acquitted former Boston firefighter Albert Arroyo of pension fraud.
  •   2011 MUZZLE AWARDS: CAMPUS EDITION  |  June 29, 2011
    Law school is not known for being fun, so some professors spice instruction with far-fetched hypotheticals. To some students at Widener University School of Law in Wilmington, Delaware, one longtime criminal-law prof's hypos went too far.  
  •   CURBING CORRUPTION WITH A CATCH-ALL  |  June 24, 2011
    Sal DiMasi is no saint, but that doesn't mean he's a criminal. His behavior makes us grimace, but it simply doesn't amount to a state or federal felony.

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2012 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group