Imagine all the Democrats

How would the party’s three Corner-Office hopefuls run Massachusetts?
By ADAM REILLY  |  September 1, 2006

Deval Patrick
There are two big things worth knowing about the battle for the Democratic governor’s nomination. First off, the race is a doozy: according to a recent Boston Globe poll, former Coke executive and Clinton-administration official Deval Patrick has the backing of 31 percent of likely Democratic-primary voters, with venture capitalist/philanthropist Chris Gabrieli pulling in 30 percent and Massachusetts attorney general Tom Reilly nabbing 27 percent.

The other point? Barely anyone cares. According to Secretary of State Bill Galvin, Massachusetts’s top election officer, less than 20 percent of eligible Democratic voters will actually go to the polls on September 19. This apathy isn’t entirely unexpected: it’s the dog days of summer, and the Democratic nominee will still have to face lieutenant governor and Republican nominee Kerry Healey in November’s general election. Even so, since the primary is less than three weeks away, now is probably a good time to ponder exactly what sort of governor Patrick, Gabrieli, and Reilly would actually be. The Phoenix recently asked various political observers for their thoughts, and came up with a number of insights worth pondering, concerning everything from how each candidate would work with the Massachusetts legislature to the sort of people they’d attract to state government. Here are the highlights.

Patrick: ‘a national figure overnight’
Deval Patrick’s candidacy is predicated on the notion that he’s qualitatively different from his rivals — and while there’s hubris in his catchphrase, “No Ordinary Leader,” there’s also a measure of truth. Patrick’s charisma and eloquence set him apart; throw in the fact that he would be the country’s sole African-American governor if elected, and it’s safe to assume a Patrick governorship would be an event of some magnitude. “If Patrick is elected,” one observer predicts, “he becomes a national figure overnight.”

That’s fine, but how would he run Massachusetts? “I think Patrick would be the kind of manager who sets the broad parameters of what his administration would set out to accomplish, and then delegates,” says one prominent Democrat. This kind of leadership requires naming good people who are allowed to succeed — which is where Patrick’s potential as a celebrity politician could pay off: one political observer imagines a Patrick administration filled with “people who are probably younger and less experienced, but very interested in government, who are seeing this new direction of the state and wanting to be a part of it.”

Meanwhile, former Democratic National Committee chairman Steve Grossman — who’s supporting Tom Reilly — thinks Patrick would make a point of bringing underrepresented constituencies into his administration. “Deval Patrick’s ascent to the governorship would probably be the most significant force that I could imagine in the political empowerment of communities that have taken root here but haven’t had a champion because they’re relatively new,” Grossman says. (One example he cites: Massachusetts’s burgeoning Brazilian community, which still has a low political profile.) “I think that when important debates and discussions were held, Deval would want around the table men and women who represented new communities, new constituencies, new points of view.”

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Gabrieli’s promise, The Dems are coming, Kicking and screaming, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Tom Reilly, Gay and Lesbian Relationships,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY