Ground game

By ADAM REILLY  |  October 20, 2006

GET BEHIND ME: Patrick’s charisma has earned him thousands of victims.
Is it that easy?
But does this argument really hold up to scrutiny? True, a recent analysis of the benefits of grassroots organizing — Get Out The Vote! How to Increase Voter Turnout (Brookings) — seems to bolster Dukakis’s claim. Donald Green, a political scientist at Yale and one of the study’s authors, explains the argument this way. For any demographically discrete group of voters, face-to-face contact increases turnout from that group’s members between seven and 12 percent.

“Conventional tactics like robo-calls or e-mail or direct mail tend to be relatively ineffective,” Green says. “The maximally effective kind of strategy is one that makes a person connect with voters, especially face to face.”

There’s a catch, however. For this approach to work, Green continues, a campaign needs a “disciplined canvassing crew that can speak credibly and persuasively about the candidate.” And to get a group like this — my argument here, not Green’s — the attendant circumstances need to be just right.

When Dukakis ran against Ed King in 1982, for example, his supporters were motivated by a keen sense of grievance. King, who’d knocked off then-governor Dukakis in the 1978 primary, was a conservative Democrat fond of lavishing praise on Ronald Reagan; to the Dukakoids, he was a usurper and an apostate. This year, meanwhile, Democrats have a nominee blessed with charisma and great rhetorical gifts — and their collective frustration is incredibly intense after 16 years of Republican governors. It’s hard to imagine Mark Roosevelt, the Democrats’ sacrificial lamb against popular Republican governor Bill Weld in 1994, winning that race by recruiting a bunch of precinct captains. And it’s just as hard to imagine Tom Reilly succeeding with the same approach this year.

Michael Goldman — a former Democratic political consultant who hosts the Simply Put program for Bloomberg Radio — is quick to lavish praise on Patrick’s campaign, which he predicts will become an academic case study. “They’ll be talking about this campaign at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government for years to come,” Goldman says. On the other hand, Goldman notes, the campaign benefited from “a perfect storm — a charismatic candidate, people looking to beat back 16 years of Republicans, and a field person [i.e., John Walsh, the field-focused campaign manager] who people genuinely liked and respected and wanted to work for. It’ll be another 50 years before you see it again.”

UMass Boston political-science professor Paul Watanabe is similarly skeptical about the broad applicability of the Patrick model. “It’s like opening up a new restaurant,” Watanabe says. “It may be modern, it may be sleek, but if the food isn’t any good, no one will come.

“Everyone since Howard Dean has tried to mimic Howard Dean,” Watanabe adds. “But if it were that easy, Howard Dean might have been more than a presidential candidate who became extinct pretty quickly.”

Networking versus media
The Dean reference is particularly apt, since Patrick — like Dean — has come as far as he has thanks largely to smart use of the Internet. If you’re reading this near a computer, go to, the Web site of Kerry Healey, Patrick’s Republican rival, and check out the options under “Get Involved.” You can give money, sign up to volunteer (they’ll get back to you), register to vote, get contact info for local newspapers and talk-radio shows, and send pre-written e-mails to your friends. Not bad, but nothing earthshaking.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Whither the GOP?, Shadow of a doubt, Same Old Faces, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Scott Harshbarger, University of Massachusetts Boston,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY