Good Deval, bad Deval

How will Governor Patrick work the press?
By ADAM REILLY  |  January 8, 2007

070105_deval_main
DEVAL VALUES PEOPLE: but prefers to talk to them directly.

There are a few ways to interpret Deval Patrick’s weeklong million-dollar inaugural bash, which includes festivities throughout Massachusetts and concludes with Patrick’s swearing-in outside the State House on January 4. Maybe it’s a celebration of the people who made his victory possible; maybe it’s an overblown ego-fest. But there’s a third possibility too — namely, that Patrick’s straight-to-the-people inaugural is a metaphor for his nascent press strategy. “This inaugural, with its outside setting and big screens — I think Patrick’s goal is to let as many people as possible decide what they’ve seen,” says a Boston journalist who asked not to be identified by name. “What that does is, it diminishes the role of the media as interpreter. And I think he’d like that. I think he likes regular people, and I think regular people like him."

Time will tell
It may seem a bit early to ask how Governor Patrick plans to work the media, since he hasn’t actually started doing the job yet. But the decisions Patrick and his surrogates made during the campaign and after Patrick’s general-election win offer some tantalizing clues.

Early on, Patrick the candidate showed a remarkable knack for face-to-face interactions with journalists. At press conferences, Patrick acted almost like his own media liaison, closing the proceedings by asking reporters if they were satisfied — “You guys have everything you need?” — and occasionally offering helpful advice. (Everyone who was there seems to remember Patrick warning NECN’s Alison King that her hair was in the way of FOX-25 reporter Joe Battenfeld’s camera.) “Basing it on the campaign,” a second Boston journalist says, “probably the best weapon they have to deal with the press is Patrick himself. He’s very good at massaging people’s big egos, and he’s very good at being accessible when he wants to be.”

Ah, but there’s the catch! Journalists like their politicians to be available on demand; they also want to be the conduits through which all sensitive information flows. But Patrick hasn’t always complied. When he revealed, during the Democratic primary, that a tax lien had once been placed on his Milton home, Patrick didn’t hold a press conference or give a reporter an exclusive scoop; instead, he e-mailed a statement to his supporters and let the media chase the story from there.

What’s more, as the campaign progressed, many journalists found it maddeningly difficult to get comments from Patrick and his media team, which included communications director Richard Chacón and press secretary Libby DeVecchi. The following sequence seems to have been representative: reporter X calls Patrick’s minders repeatedly to get comment for a story; Patrick’s minders promise they’ll do their best; deadline comes and goes without Patrick or his now-contrite surrogates commenting for the record.

To be fair, this diminished accessibility may simply have reflected increased demands on Patrick’s time as he went from unknown outsider to in-demand front-runner. It could also have been a strategic shift by the campaign: as an unknown, Patrick needed all the free PR he could get, but when he was sitting on a big lead against Kerry Healey — and facing a host of tough questions — media attention was less necessary and less welcome. It’s also worth noting that Patrick’s relative unresponsiveness, which marked the period following his win as well, hasn’t just frustrated the press: some of his best-known political allies have reportedly been surprised by their inability to reach the governor-elect.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Doug Rubin, Deval Patrick, Nancy Fernandez Mills,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY