Toward a unifying theory of Mitt

Puff piece
By ADAM REILLY  |  March 14, 2007

The publicity materials for A Mormon in the White House? 10 things every American should know about Mitt Romney (Regnery) feature this declaration from author Hugh Hewitt: “This is the book Mitt Romney didn’t want written. It explores the angles the mainstream media would never see, and raises the questions Mitt Romney would rather disappear.”

Don’t believe it. If Romney is elected president, A Mormon in the White House? should earn Hewitt an appointment as Minister of Propaganda. Some highlights from his purported muckraking:

“Enter Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, former leader of the Salt Lake City Olympics, a billionaire venture capitalist who blazed his way through Harvard’s Business and Law Schools and then built a reputation as one of the country’s most brilliant and successful entrepreneurs. The eloquent, funny, self-deprecating father of five sons and grandfather to eleven grandchildren has been married to Ann Romney for more than three and a half decades. He is pro-life, pro-marriage, and pro-Second Amendment. He understands economic growth and the world economy as only wildly successful businessmen do” (pp. 3–4; emphasis added here and elsewhere)

“Many in the pro-life movement will look for candidates willing to master this complex terrain [i.e., stem-cell research] and to advocate for alternatives that protect unborn life, even in its earliest form. Romney’s record in Massachusetts will appeal to such activists.” (p. 115)

“On marriage, Romney advocates for the mainstream position in the country, a solution that happens to be conservative and that rejects extremist solutions and denounces extremist rhetoric.” (p. 143)

All this pales, though, next to the treatment Hewitt gives Romney’s Mormonism. Borrowing the structure of the Right’s argument against gay marriage (i.e., gay-marriage advocates actually want to destroy the very institution of marriage), Hewitt claims that discussion of the political implications of Romney’s faith is actually part of a broader secular attack. Quoth Hugh:

The Left will relish the assault on Romney’s faith, treating it as the soft underbelly of a more generalized assault on the idea of religious belief leading, they hope, to the routine dismissal from the public’s consideration as leaders any man or woman who believes in revelation as well as reason. (p. 8)

Never mind that Hewitt’s full of shit — this is truly ingenious stuff. In one fell swoop, Romney is transformed from an object of suspicion to a martyr to the cause, someone whose candidacy deserves the support of believers of all stripes.

Will it work? We’ll know next year. For now, though, the early signs are promising: as of Tuesday afternoon, a day after its publication date, A Mormon in the White House? was Number 60 on It's since risen to Number 30.

Related: Feeding the rabid right, Conservatives shrug off the Globe’s Romney-lawn exposé, Can Mitt win?, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Mitt Romney, Elections and Voting, Politics,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY