Self-inflicted wounds

By ADAM REILLY  |  March 30, 2007

Bathed in light
That such trappings might lead journalists to treat anti-war gatherings skeptically — and give similar pause to the 60-plus percent of Americans who currently oppose the Iraq War — seems both obvious and worrisome. But it’s hard to find anyone on the left who agrees. “I think what this really is is a crime of opportunity,” says Jim Spencer, a Boston political consultant and alum of ’60s-era protest group Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), when asked about the current anti-war movement’s tendency toward diffuseness. “You’ve got groups of people gathering around a cause, and you have other people who believe in that cause who have another cause, too, as organizers. Historically, throughout any social movement, that’s always happened.”

“That’s characteristic of radical movements in general,” agrees Zinn. “Part of any movement is always further to the left, and bringing in larger, broader, different issues. Then there’s usually the major part of the movement which is concentrated on one issue, and which is able to unite more people.”

And what about dubious deployment of Vietnam-era iconography? Jane Fonda, the anti-war activist whom the Vietnam-era right loved to hate, was conspicuously present for the January 27 rally in Washington, DC; a Reuters photographer even captured her clinging dramatically to fellow actress-activist Susan Sarandon. Surely that wasn’t a smart move?

Zinn wouldn’t have it. “I think that’s being overly cautious,” he replied. “If I were around when somebody said, ‘Oh, we shouldn’t have Jane Fonda here,” I would resent that. That’s surrendering to that minority of the American public who were hostile to Jane Fonda. After all, most Americans came around to oppose the war.”

“I don’t think a movement should judge its tactics by how a vociferous right-wing minority will react,” Zinn added. “I think, in fact, that it’s good to make a connection between Vietnam and Iraq. And I think Jane Fonda symbolized that connection.”

But is the Iraq-Vietnam connection really a good one to make? Or, to put it more accurately: is it really good to make that connection in the way Zinn suggests? Today’s anti-war activists have a burden their Vietnam War–era counterparts never had to contend with — namely, the legacy of Vietnam. It’s because of Vietnam that catch phrases like “Support our troops” have more power than they should. It’s because of Vietnam that the press signed on to the military’s absurd “embedding” project before the Iraq War started. And it’s because of Vietnam that critics of the Iraq War need to be so cautious about alienating those who fundamentally agree with them.

Of course, striving for a more standardized and palatable message would run counter to Radicalism 101, which holds that the great strength of coalitions is their diversity. It might also offend the sensibilities of activists who see the Iraq War as one manifestation of bigger systemic woes. But if the goal is to galvanize and strengthen opposition to the war — as opposed to luxuriation in a general sense of righteousness — it’s a shift worth considering.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Anti-war rally, Back to the barricades, Does peace have a chance?, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Racial Issues, Social Issues, Boston University,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY