Leary says, “It is incumbent on the attorney general — now that this is out there — to make sure that the policies used by the Department of Corrections” fit with the consent decrees.

He also comments on the attorney general’s hesitation to answer questions about when he or his department knew about the consent decrees: “I don’t understand it. Either they didn’t know about them, which I’m hoping was the case, or they knew, and then their attitude defending restrictions on the press makes no sense to me.”

Governor John Baldacci’s spokesman says the governor’s staff was unaware of the consent decrees until the Phoenix asked about them. Speaking of the issues involved, David Farmer says the governor takes “questions of open government very seriously,” but “safety and privacy,” too, have to be weighed when considering reporters’ access to prisoners.

Class-action suits
The three lawsuits were Langford v. Murphy, Picariello v. Robbins, and Heald v. Mullaney. The first two were “class action” suits. Langford was brought on behalf of all Maine reporters and all Maine prison-system inmates; Picariello was brought on behalf of just the state prison’s inmates. The third suit, Heald, which addressed the system’s right to ship convicts from one prison to another, dealt with the wrong done to one prisoner, but it may have implications for all such transfers.

In Langford, inmate Kenneth Denault joined the Sunday Telegram writer to sue for permission to speak with each other. In that era, access generally was denied. “They seemed blindsided by the whole idea of media scrutiny,” Langford says of prison officials. The resulting order established that “inmates of correctional institutions in the State of Maine and members of the news media are entitled to have access to each other and open lines of communication.”

As part of the legal settlement, Corrections officials had to write a media policy, apparently the department's first. Effective at the start of 1972, the court-endorsed policy laid out the details of media-prisoner contact. It required “promptly arranged” coverage or access, allowed cameras and sound-recording devices into the prisons, and required access even to prisoners housed in “segregated confinement,” which nowadays largely means the 100-prisoner Supermax. Denial of access or coverage could be only on safety or security grounds.

In Picariello, the federal court determined that Maine State Prison inmates “have a right under the First Amendment to send letters to the Press concerning prison management, treatment of offenders, or personal grievances.” Its chief plaintiff, Richard Picariello, was an inmate who belonged to a prisoner-rights organization called SCAR, the Statewide Correctional Alliance for Reform.

Responses from and interactions with state Corrections officials during the time the Phoenix has been reporting on prison conditions have not conformed to the standards set by the court in those two cases (see sidebar, “Press Behind Bars”).

The third order, the Heald consent decree, deals with “intrastate and interstate inter-institutional transfer of residents of institutions under the administrative supervision” of Corrections. Transfer decisions need “procedural due process” required under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The suit was brought by Augustus Heald, a convicted robber who was taken from the state prison in 1971, in the governor’s plane, to a notoriously harsh federal penitentiary in Marion, Illinois. This action was a consequence, his attorneys said, of his complaints about Maine prison conditions as head of the inmates’ council. Judge Gignoux found that his transfer “without prior notice or opportunity for hearing” was invalid. Heald was brought back to Maine in 1973.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
  Topics: News Features , U.S. Government, U.S. State Government, University of Maine School of Law,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY LANCE TAPLEY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MICHAEL JAMES SENT BACK TO PRISON  |  April 16, 2014
    The hearing’s topic was whether James’s “antisocial personality disorder” was enough of a mental disease to keep him from being sent to prison.
  •   LOCKING UP THE MENTALLY ILL  |  April 03, 2014
    The merger of the prison and mental-health systems continues
  •   WHERE ARE THE LEADERS ON CLIMATE CHANGE?  |  March 20, 2014
    The conference was held in March despite the risk of a snowstorm because its organizers wanted “to reach the Legislature while it’s in session,” co-coordinator Fred Horch said.
  •   ANATOMY OF A RIP-OFF, PART II  |  March 06, 2014
    Imagine if state government gave out millions of dollars a year to fat-cat financiers, big banks,  and speculative ventures without monitoring how the money is spent — basically, giving it to whoever walks in the door as long as they flash a few credentials.
  •   ANATOMY OF A TAXPAYER RIP-OFF  |  February 19, 2014
    To try to restore several hundred mill jobs to the historic paper-making North Country towns of Millinocket and East Millinocket, Maine’s politicians, in a bipartisan manner, have given away and are planning to give away millions of taxpayer dollars to various corporate interests, including big, out-of-state banks.

 See all articles by: LANCE TAPLEY