Alito agreed, concluding that such speech — while unwelcome in the eyes of gay students and others — could hardly be seen to “pose a realistic threat of substantial disruption” and “is within a student’s First Amendment rights.” What one student considered hate speech, Alito argued, another could fairly consider free speech. He invalidated the code, pushing back against would-be academic censors seeking to outlaw politically incorrect speech.

In the wake of Morse, it is necessary to rethink Alito’s apparently principled position in Saxe, which this column noted favorably in the past. Alito’s double standard protects a religious kid’s undoubted right to tell a gay student he is going to Hell, but not another kid’s right to make a nonsensical statement linking Jesus with drug use. This solicitousness toward the religious right is unprincipled judicial activism.

The beauty of “judicial reasoning” is that it can define and protect the blessings of liberty in a constitutional society. But it can also be a cover for blatant hypocrisy.

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Inmate sues prison officials in federal court, The 10th Annual Muzzle Awards, High time for high principles, More more >
  Topics: This Just In , Politics, Culture and Lifestyle, George W. Bush,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   NAKED IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE  |  June 25, 2008
    In the finest Puritan tradition, Middlesex District Attorney Gerald Leone is crusading to save Harvard Square from the shock and awe of the nude human form.
  •   ECHOES OF RODNEY KING  |  February 21, 2008
    When Simon Glik used his cell phone to record Boston police officers making what he thought was an overly forceful arrest on Tremont Street, he didn’t think he would be the one who ended up in the back of a police cruiser.
  •   ALITO: HYPOCRISY IN HIGH PLACES  |  July 03, 2007
    The First Amendment took two big hits from the Supreme Court on June 25.