Ménage-à-trashed?

By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  July 11, 2007

But you don’t touch tourism earmarks when Terry Murray, who hails from the Cape, is in charge — even if she is under investigation for previous pork-barrel spending. Thanks to Murray, line 7007-0900 in the final budget allocates a hefty $28.2 million — $14.3 million of it through 144 specific earmarks, in a list that takes up seven pages in the printed budget and contains such “tourism” projects as Alzheimer’s services, school-safety initiatives, and a $25,000 study of the history of glassblowing in Massachusetts.

That’s hardly the lot of it; if Patrick wants to show that he’s serious about reform, he can easily find $20 million or more in earmarks alone to veto.

It would be a lonely stand. Earmarks, however unpopular in theory, are beloved in their particulars. Legislators spent the Fourth of July bragging to their local press about the funding they snagged for local projects. To save their own small victories, lawmakers are more than willing to vote for them all.

In fact, the legislature’s attitude about Patrick and the budget has grown more than a little patronizing: they don’t believe the governor would be dumb enough to make them override his vetoes. “It really would set the wrong tone for him here on Beacon Hill,” tut-tuts one representative’s budget director.

Mind you, a need to remind those snooty solons that he’s still in the fight could prompt Patrick to unleash the veto pen with even greater zeal. But he may have to thread the needle more delicately.

“The veto and override process can be healthy,” says Noah Berger, executive director of the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center.” Going through the process strengthens the system of accountability and transparency. It doesn’t have to be hostile.”

Understandably, Patrick doesn’t want to simply roll over on this budget, after all his lofty talk of fighting for his priorities. But he doesn’t want to make unnecessary enemies, either, with big battles on the horizon. If he can make his point through targeted line-item vetoes, without starting a shouting match, perhaps the cozy fling can last a little longer.

On the Web
David S. Bernstein's Talking Politics: http://www.thephoenix.com/talkingpolitics

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  | 
Related: State of flux, Power hungry?, No side bets, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Deval Patrick, Deval Patrick, Beacon Hill,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
  •   RED BLUES: SCOTT BROWN EXPOSES THE EMPTY MASSACHUSETTS GOP BENCH  |  February 15, 2013
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN