Guinea pigs

By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  October 31, 2007

Some, including McDonough of Health Care For All, argue that the penalty should be lower during this start-up phase. McDonough says that a lower fine is under consideration. “We’ve been urging the Patrick administration to view 2008 as a phase-in year,” he says.

But those eager to extend the Massachusetts plan elsewhere want to hurry the process of pushing people to enroll, not delay it. With health-care reform such a hot topic on the campaign trail, there’s a good chance the president elected in November 2008 will enter office with a mandate to enact reform. McDonough knows that national observers want concrete results by then. “All the work we’re doing in Massachusetts,” he says, “is really preparatory for the national effort that will begin in June 2009.”

Federal help
That mandate won’t be there, however, if voters elect the man who led the charge to enact the Massachusetts system. As much of the fate of the country’s health care weighs on the Massachusetts experiment, it weighs particularly heavily on its chief architect: former governor Mitt Romney.

Romney, now seeking the Republican Party’s presidential nomination, can’t seem to decide how he feels about the plan he spawned.

When he signed the health-care reform package into law, in late 2006, many expected it to be the signature bragging point of Romney’s four otherwise lackluster years running the state. But when conservative think tanks found fault with his approach, Romney seemed to drop it like his old pro-choice position.

Romney’s current proposal disavows the individual mandate, which many conservative Republicans view as intrusive governmental interference. He has even derided the Edwards and Clinton plans as something out of the communist Soviet Union playbook.

Later in the campaign, however, Romney again started taking credit for the Massachusetts plan — or parts of it, anyway — in an attempt to distinguish between what he calls Massachusetts’s “market-driven” approach and Clinton’s nearly identical plan, which Romney calls “government-driven.”

So, if the Massachusetts plan works smoothly, is that good news for Romney, who spawned it, or bad news since it clashes with what he now claims to support?

Regardless of the presidential politics involved, some Washington observers believe that any federal health-care-reform bill would leave the issue of individual mandates to the states. But the federal government could give states, including Massachusetts, a better shot at making their mandates work.

One way the federal government could help is now under consideration in congressional committees, and involves the federal tax code. It would extend to individual insurance purchasers the tax break currently enjoyed by those insured through their employers. Members of employee plans are not taxed on the income used to pay for health insurance. The same is not true for those buying insurance on their own.

Providing that federal tax break would make health insurance more affordable for those now being hit by the individual mandate in Massachusetts. In the meantime, Massachusetts has done what it can to bring down the cost of insurance, subsidizing the cost through two main sources: fines on businesses that don’t provide insurance to employees, and savings from the Uncompensated Care Pool, which should be used less as more state residents become insured.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: The morning after, Presidential toteboard: To run, or not to run, The rats in Romney’s corner, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Mitt Romney, John McDonough, Georgetown University,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN