Toxic talk: Hating Obama

By ADAM REILLY  |  January 19, 2009

Of late, however, MMA's complaints have been far more mundane — e.g., Fox News host Sean Hannity pushing the notion that the Rod Blagojevich scandal is bad for Obama, and Hannity's colleague Brit Hume calling the New Deal (which Obama seems poised to emulate) a failure. These arguments may be dubious and pernicious. But they pale in comparison to Hannity devoting an entire pre-election broadcast to a quack documentary that cast Obama as a menacing cipher whose election would imperil America.

"One contributing factor, I think, is that everyone understands that the country is facing very serious economic times," says J. Jioni Palmer, MMA's national press secretary. "This is a very dire situation, and you kind of have to want to root for the president — because if you're rooting against the president, you're rooting against our collective interest as Americans. So he's clearly benefiting from a little bit of a honeymoon."

Talk backlash
In that case — and with apologies for the ripped-off phrase — is this change we can believe in? Or is it just a temporary lull?

In fact, a decent case can be made that the most intense days of Obama hatred are behind us. During the campaign, one major source of Obama-phobia was the conviction that, despite all his campaign rhetoric, he was secretly an ultra-liberal (or socialist, or whatever) who'd run amok if elected. But thus far, Obama's big pre-presidential decisions — his cabinet picks, his public-policy pronouncements, even his controversial choice of Pastor Rick Warren to deliver the inaugural invocation — have shown him, instead, to be what many of us expected all along: a centrist Democrat with a conciliatory bent and occasional liberal leanings, but not a havoc-wreaking radical.

There are, in all likelihood, die-hard Obama skeptics who believe he's still dissembling, and that he'll unleash his inner Marx once he takes office. But as time passes — and if Obama keeps acting like the moderate he clearly is — their ranks will diminish.

A similar dynamic should mitigate the distrust of anxious whites (and Latinos, and Asians) who assumed that a black president would govern differently — more blackly, somehow — than his predecessors. Here, too, vaguely imagined fears about the disaster to come are going to be mitigated, time and again, by factual evidence to the contrary. Yes, the hard-core racists will keep on hating. (It's a hard habit to break. Back in 1948, members of the States Rights' Party were so affronted by Harry Truman's cautious dalliance with civil rights that they lynched him in effigy at a Birmingham, Alabama, hotel and ran Strom Thurmond for president.) But others — like your uncle who's a nice guy and everything, but expects Obama to make reparations for slavery his top priority in 2009 — will gradually start to relax.

Finally, regarding the worrisome Clinton parallel: it's worth noting that Clinton's divisiveness stemmed, in large part, from questionable personal behavior (see Lewinsky, Monica). Prior to Clinton's election, there were signs he had trouble controlling his appetites; in contrast, Obama seems downright ascetic — which could serve him well with the faith-and-values crowd.

All that said, however, an even stronger argument can be made that extreme anti-Obama hate is here to stay — and may even get a whole lot worse.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Rise of the political bogeyman, Take Back Barack, Party like it's 1999, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Barack Obama, Democrats, Osama bin Laden,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY