Will the Globe survive?

By ADAM REILLY  |  April 30, 2009

The union official who responded to this critique sounded irked, too. After giving the reporter a crash course in Negotiating 101 — you start strong and aggressive, and save the concessions for later — he complained that some members, particularly those who've publicly questioned the union, are coming close to betraying the union as a whole. In effect: we're doing our best for you, and you're kicking the crap out of us. (The surveys, it was later explained, would be taken into account by Guild leadership, though it wasn't exactly clear how.)

Whether this acrimony was worse than you'd expect from a union under duress — particularly one comprising workers with radically different job descriptions — is an open question. Maybe the April 23 meeting provided a catharsis that will bring the Guild's members together. By the meeting's end, this antagonism had given way to professions of mutual interest and respect. (The following day, I got an anonymous call from a woman who identified herself as a Globe journalist, and said the Guild's critics were beginning to "get it.")

Even if that's true, though, the Globe's journalists have to be kicking themselves right now. The union's executive committee is currently dominated by non-journalists — men and women who, given the jobs they do every day, naturally find it difficult to envision (let alone embrace) a post-print future. And this situation exists, in large part, due to the newsroom's long-standing disinterest in union matters. If the Globe manages to survive, expect that to change.

Rallying in vain?
Given the stakes involved, it would be nice to report that the Guild's "Save the Globe" rally — held at Faneuil Hall on April 24, the day after Baron spoke and the Guild's detractors and defenders duked it out — was a smashing success. But that would be going too far.

First the good news: there were moments, this past Friday, when the indignation of the Globe's supporters was truly righteous — moments where you actually felt that, if the bigwigs of the Times Co. took just a minute and listened, they'd see the error of their ways, hang their heads in shame, and commit to doing whatever was necessary to keep the Globe alive.

Unfortunately, most of these moments came in veteran reporter Brian Mooney's speech. "I'm worried about keeping my job, but that's not the point," said Mooney. "What's important is the survival of the Globe itself. . . . We go wider and deeper in our coverage than anyone. The Globe starts the conversation and referees the debate, 365 days a year, and now 24 hours a day."

If there was overstatement here, there was also a considerable amount of truth. And Mooney deserves extra kudos for his devastating dissection of the perks that Times Co. chairman Sulzberger and CEO Robinson have enjoyed (one-time bonuses awarded in the very bad year of 2008, Sulzberger's $11,000 spin that same year in the Times Co.'s private jet) — a sustained takedown that led, at one point, to a nifty little call-and-response with the audience: "Shame on the New York Times Company!" "Shame on them!"

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: Fourth-estate follies, 2009 edition, Brave new Globe?, The Globe's biggest union expels its head, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Brian Mooney, Brian Mooney, George Regan,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY