Die another day

By ADAM REILLY  |  May 7, 2009

Obvious as that point sounds, it looked for a while like Guild head Dan Totten might not get it. While the Guild did provide the $10 million in concessions requested of it, union leadership had steadfastly refused to budge on the elimination of the lifetime-job guarantees held by roughly 190 of the Guild's 600-some members. Management, in turn, saw the elimination or substantial modification of those guarantees as absolutely essential if the paper wasn't going to be shuttered.

This conjured up a grimly absurd scenario: by insisting on the rights of a third of its members to perpetual employment, the Guild risked leaving all Globe workers unemployed — and, for good measure, depriving Bostonians of their paper of record.

What changed? Start with management's late-breaking, game-changing request for a whopping 23 percent pay cut by the Guild's members. (The message here: if you're not going to give up lifetime guarantees, we're really going to bring the pain.) Things were also nudged along when the two other unions whose members have held lifetime guarantees caved at least somewhat on that front.

When that happened, the Guild was under tremendous pressure to do the same — especially because this concession was far more painful for some other unions than it would be for the Guild. At the Boston Mailers Union, for example, all 145 full-time members have lifetime guarantees. (One hundred part-time members don't, and would be the first to go if layoffs hit.) But even though the shift from print to the Web threatens the mailers with obsolescence down the road, the mailers' leaders were willing, before their Guild counterparts, to rethink their lifetime-guarantee provision in order to keep the paper alive.

The Guild's own internal rules also loomed over Totten and his fellow Guild brass like a procedural Sword of Damocles. The bar for initiating a recall election of the union's leader(s) is relatively low: according to Article IX of the Guild's constitution and bylaws, the process can be triggered by a formal petition from just 20 percent of the union's members — i.e., about 120 people. Since about two-thirds of the Guild's members don't have lifetime guarantees, this wouldn't have been a difficult threshold to meet. And since the Times Co. seemed unwilling to actually close down the Globe until the 60-day waiting period mandated by the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act (WARN) had elapsed, there would have been plenty of time — if necessary — for new, more flexible union leadership to be installed.

Fortunately, it didn't come to that. And Totten and the other Guild higher-ups deserve a measure of credit.

Let the record show that the lifetime-job guarantees (which were formalized in 1994) actually represented a concession on the part of the Guild's members, who'd previously benefited from an even more expansive "no-layoff" clause that applied to all full-time employees. Let it show, too, that Totten and three other members of the Guild's executive committee have benefited from the guarantees in question.

But times have changed: given the decline of the newspaper business in general and the Globe in particular, what once looked like managerial decency is now tantamount to economic suicide. If the guarantees hadn't gone, the Globe apparently would have. Principle and self-interest notwithstanding, Totten & co. cared enough about their colleagues — and the paper — not to let that happen.

To read the "Don't Quote Me" blog, go to thePhoenix.com/medialog. Adam Reilly can be reached at areilly@phx.com.

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Red all over, Brave new Globe?, Will the Globe survive?, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Media, AL East Division, American League (Baseball),  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY