Tweet-Fighting Man

By ADAM REILLY  |  July 6, 2009

It's also evident that Twitter has a unique ability to collapse the emotional distance between the objects of news coverage and the reading/watching/listening public. This capacity follows from Twitter's decentralized, choose-your-own-conversation structure: if you've got a Twitter account and a cell phone (or computer) and weigh in on the Iranian situation using the tag #iranelection, your comments can be read by everyone following that subject, whether you're posting from Tehran or Teaneck. That alone creates a potential for participatory transnational solidarity that surpasses anything experienced during, say, the fall of communism two decades ago.

And if, as a non-Iranian, you join the criticism of CNN's supposedly sparse Iran coverage by posting with the tag #cnnfail — or help to disseminate information on Web proxies for Iranians seeking to avoid government censorship of the Internet — the sense of being united in struggle with Iran's dissidents grows even more palpable. As Shirky put it: "Twitter makes us empathize. It makes us part of it."

So far, so clear. But when we turn to Twitter's role on the ground in Iran, the picture gets murkier. Case in point: on June 15, the Atlantic's Marc Ambinder wrote, in a post titled "The Revolution Will Be Twittered," of Iranian dissidents using Twitter to warn each other of impending violent crackdowns by the government, thereby saving the lives "of any number of would-be revolutionaries."

It's true that Twitter may have saved tens of thousands of lives in the days following the election. Then again, it may not have saved any at all. We simply don't know, since no journalist or historian or political scientist has yet had the luxury of talking with key figures from the opposition and figuring out how important Twitter was in terms of protecting dissenters.

By the same token, no one's been able to study — with the precision required to make the sort of declaratory statement everyone currently craves — exactly what role Twitter played in mobilizing and sustaining resistance to the regime. (Writing at, Open Society Institute fellow Evgeny Morozov — who previously extolled Twitter's significance among Moldovan-government opponents earlier this year — convincingly made this point.)

We can, however, identify some problems Twitter may pose for Iran's dissenters. In addition to the perils of Twitter-driven disinformation (intentional or inadvertent) and Twitter-based government eavesdropping, the site's aforementioned inclusiveness poses its own problems. When Twitter users everywhere changed their designated location to Tehran to protect their Iranian counterparts from retribution, they also made it harder to discern — via geographic sorting of tweets — which users actually had information worth sharing.

Maybe we'll eventually discover that Twitter really was the organizational engine of the Iranian opposition. But even if that's the case, contends Jack A. Goldstone, director of the Center for Global Policy at George Mason University, its big-picture importance shouldn't be overstated. In Iran, Goldstone tells the Phoenix via e-mail, Twitter seems to be doing the work previously done by speeches, leaflets, newspapers, radio, and television. However, he adds, "It hasn't changed the basic mode of protest (physical challenge to regime order by public demonstrations by crowds) or the basic message (we are numerous, virtuous, united, and resolute)."

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Travels with Sarah, The Year of the Nerd, Novel idea: Twitter fiction, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Tweet, Media, Iran,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY