090710_waxman_main

Dory Waxman, Portland, Maine
Council candidate tries to ban opponent's flier
DORY WAXMAN had a problem. Her opponent for an at-large seat on the Portland City Council, incumbent Edward Suslovic (like her, a Democrat), had circulated a campaign flier quoting Maine House Speaker Glenn Cummings as praising Suslovic's "visionary" leadership.

But Waxman knew just what to do. Notwithstanding the fact that Suslovic's flier was entirely accurate, Waxman filed a complaint with the state ethics commission, arguing that the Cummings quote amounted to an endorsement by the Speaker. In reality, Cummings, also a Democrat, had declined to choose between either of his party mates. Waxman thus claimed that Suslovic's flier was false, and therefore illegal.

The commission — formally known as the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices — voted unanimously in Suslovic's favor. But the case was an annoying distraction, created by Waxman's embrace of a law aimed at stifling free speech.

This isn't the first time Maine's election laws have been the subject of a Muzzle Award. In 2007, we whacked the ethics commission for ruling that a Republican candidate for the state legislature, Cape Elizabeth resident Michael Mowles, had violated the law by recycling two-year-old endorsements (clearly labeled as such) from Maine's Republican senators, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. The ethics commission fined Mowles $1 and publicized its findings just before the primary election, which may have contributed to his loss to a fellow Republican.

Mowles had actually requested at least a token fine so he'd have standing to sue. And with the help of the Maine Civil Liberties Union, he succeeded in persuading Maine's Supreme Judicial Court to overturn the law. "American history cautions against governmental regulation of political speech," Chief Justice Leigh Saufley wrote in her decision last October. "Absent that caution, in the guise of the most benevolent purposes, an incumbent government could restrict the free flow of information and debate in the public marketplace of ideas."

As for Waxman, she defeated Suslovic last November — in part, Suslovic charged, because of a last-minute attack flier funded by one of her supporters. Ironic, to say the least. But fully protected by the First Amendment.

<< first  ...< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |   next >...  last >>

10 of 11 (results 11)
Related: Eyes on the prize, Patrick Lynch’s labor problem, Will Caprio’s early ad spree work?, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Barack Obama, Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association, Boston Police Department,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY DAN KENNEDY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   A LOOK AT 10 ENEMIES OF FREE SPEECH AND PERSONAL LIBERTIES THROUGHOUT NEW ENGLAND  |  June 27, 2013
    Obama's longstanding lack of respect for the role of a free press in a democratic society reached new depths when it was revealed that his Justice Department had snooped on the Associated Press and Fox News' James Rosen in trying to ferret out leakers.
  •   THE 15TH ANNUAL MUZZLE AWARDS  |  July 13, 2012
    Liberal dreams that Barack Obama would somehow usher in a progressive paradise were always misplaced.
  •   INTERVIEW: RORY O’CONNOR DIGS SOCIAL MEDIA  |  May 14, 2012
    Rory O'Connor has been thinking about trust and the media for a long time.
  •   UNCOVERING THE SINS OF JOE MCGINNISS  |  October 09, 2012
    Joe McGinniss's 1983 bestseller Fatal Vision offered up Jeffrey MacDonald as a modern exemplar of evil: a narcissistic, remorseless monster who beat to death his wife and five-year-old daughter in a diet-pill-fueled frenzy, then coolly killed the only witness, his two-year-old daughter.
  •   THE 14TH ANNUAL MUZZLE AWARDS  |  June 29, 2011
    To understand just how disappointing Barack Obama has been on civil liberties, you need only consider the case of David House, a founder of the Bradley Manning Support Network.  

 See all articles by: DAN KENNEDY