By DAVID SCHARFENBERG  |  August 26, 2009

"A lot of times, unless one of us peered over the divider and asked the person next to us or called another bureau and said, 'Hey, have you seen anything like this?,' those connections wouldn't be made," said Hill, who worked for years in the bureaus.

Hill said the new system, which puts all the ProJo's reporters under the same roof, allows for more collaboration and a broader view of state happenings. And there is evidence of a shift.

Arts and education reporters recently teamed up to tackle the controversy over the ouster of the RISD Museum director; several desks provided pieces for a multi-part series examining the use of stimulus funds in the state; and a paper that might have looked at municipal contract squabbles in isolation under the old bureau system recently produced a trend piece on unions forced to make concessions in tough times.

The ProJo, which has also strived to put more of the quirky and colorful on the front page, is in many ways a more interesting read than it was a year ago. But the transition to a new sort of journalism is not complete.

For all the contextual work, there is still plenty in the way of narrowly tailored stories on local sewage plants or budget resolutions — sometimes of interest to a statewide audience, but often of limited value.

Indeed, while other papers lean more and more on analysis in a bid to stay relevant in a 24-hour news cycle — the Boston Globe recently ran an amusing piece on the hubbub over a Harvard Yard clothing line and turned Red Sox announcer Jerry Remy's return from cancer and depression into a piece on the psychological toll of illness — the ProJo still appears a gray document at times.

And there are barriers to improvement. Several of the paper's most experienced reporters and editors and columnists — those best positioned to connect the dots — left amid the buyouts and layoffs of the fall and a subsequent round of cuts in the spring.

And pulling reporters back from the zoning and school board meetings can make it harder to produce a more meaningful journalism. "The insight to do a good interpretive piece or the leads to do an investigative story often comes out of the nuts and bolts work," said Rick Edmonds, a media business analyst at the Poynter Institute, a journalism school in St. Petersburg, Florida.


But depth is about more than trend-spotting and nuanced reporting. It is also about taking the full measure of a community. Putting out a paper that reflects the readers' interest in science and business and theater. And metropolitan dailies, forced to cut somewhere, have taken the ax to this sort of "niche" reporting first.

Newspapers in Tampa, Atlanta, and Denver have dropped film critics in recent years. The Los Angeles Times has jettisoned its standalone business section. And the Boston Globe is the latest to cut its science section.

The ProJo, for its part, still has its share of theater and music reviews. But much of the paper's specialized reporting has melted away. The commitment to book reviews has waned. The paper has dropped most of its in-house Celtics and Bruins coverage.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related: The Journal gets a facelift, News worth paying for?, Newspapering the hard way, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Boston Celtics, National Basketball Association, NBA Atlantic Division,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   LIBERAL WARRIOR  |  April 10, 2013
    When it comes to his signature issues — climate change, campaign finance reform, tax fairness — Whitehouse makes little secret of his approach: marshal the facts, hammer the Republicans, and embarrass them into action.
    A key Brown University oversight committee has voted to recommend the school divest from coal, delivering a significant victory to student climate change activists.
  •   HACKING POLITICS: A GUIDE  |  April 03, 2013
    Last year, the Internet briefly upended everything we know about American politics.
  •   BREAK ON THROUGH  |  March 28, 2013
    When I spoke with Treasurer Gina Raimondo this week, I opened with the obligatory question about whether she'll run for governor. "I'm seriously considering it," she said. "But I think as you know — we've talked about it before — I have little kids: a six-year-old, an eight-year-old. I'm a mother. It's a big deal."
  •   THE LIBERAL CASE FOR GUNS  |  March 27, 2013
    The school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut spurred hope not just for sensible gun regulation, but for a more nuanced discussion of America's gun culture. Neither wish has been realized.

 See all articles by: DAVID SCHARFENBERG