Though Citizens United was a triumph for free expression, recent history gives us reason to believe that the First Amendment was more of a hook on which the Supreme Court's conservatives could hang their political hat. And the dissent of the liberals is likewise nothing to cheer. The right and left each has its own favorite form of speech deemed worthy of protection, and the twain do not often meet. Perhaps the next high-court vacancy will be filled by a jurist who sees free expression as an end in itself, rather than as a mere instrument for political gain.
Maria Romero and Kyle Smeallie, Silverglate's research assistants, contributed to this piece. Thanks to Nat Hentoff, whose book suggested the title for this piece.
Related:
The 13th Annual Muzzle Awards, Critical Mass, Muzzle Awards: Collegiate Division, More
- The 13th Annual Muzzle Awards
A year and a half into the Age of Obama, we are learning a lesson we should have figured out long ago — that repression, once in place, is rarely rolled back all the way, and that liberals no less than conservatives are reluctant to give up power.
- Critical Mass
If free speech is what gives value to the campus "marketplace of ideas," UMass Amherst would long ago have gone bankrupt.
- Muzzle Awards: Collegiate Division
In a 1957 Supreme Court decision upholding the free-speech rights of university professors ( Sweezy v. New Hampshire ), Justice Felix Frankfurter quoted prominent South African scholars on the importance of academic freedom.
- The 12th Annual Muzzle Awards
With the era of repression and secrecy fostered by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney finally over, this should be the best of times for freedom of expression, open government, and civil liberties. Yet change comes slowly.
- Sotomayor's mixed message on free speech
Minutes after President Barack Obama announced that he was nominating appellate judge Sonia Sotomayor for the vacant seat on the Supreme Court, battle lines were drawn on the pre-scripted questions of "post-racial" America.
- Free speech again quashed at Harvard
It should come as no surprise to readers of “Freedom Watch” that yet another instance of political, intellectual, and academic censorship has sprung up at Harvard, the self-touted pinnacle of higher education.
- Clearing the air
Adam Reilly’s analysis of right-wing talk radio’s support of Scott Brown was nearly perfect.
- Bully pulpit
While I understand, appreciate, and respect the First Amendment and our right to speak freely, in the case of bullying, Harvey Silverglate makes a dangerous assumption that “civilized people, even teenagers can intuit the difference between protected speech and criminal harassment.”
- 2010 Muzzle Awards on campus
Harvard and Yale universities felt the sting of the global economic collapse firsthand in 2009, as the endowments of these stalwart New England Ivy League members dropped by nearly a third. The schools didn’t fare much better in the free marketplace of ideas, either.
- Fuzzy on muzzles
The only way to know whether a society has freedom of speech is to look at how it treats unpopular speech, which doesn’t need government protection.
- Bad behavior
The ghost of George W. Bush will haunt the this year's election season.
- Less

Topics:
News Features
, Barack Obama, Election Campaigns, Elections and Voting, More
, Barack Obama, Election Campaigns, Elections and Voting, Politics, Hillary Clinton, MoveOn.org, U.S. Court of Appeals, Samuel Alito, U.S. Supreme Court, censorship, Less