Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs  |  Adult
Boston  |  Portland  |  Providence
 

The real Dowd scandal

Why are people getting so worked up about Maureen Dowd's dubious dateline, when the content of that column was egregiously incorrect?

Here's the eighth graf of "Can Hillary Cry Her Way Back to the White House?":

At the Portsmouth cafe on Monday, talking to a group of mostly women, she blinked back her misty dread of where Obama’s "false hopes" will lead us — "I just don’t want to see us fall backwards," she said tremulously — in time to smack her rival: "But some of us are right and some of us are wrong. Some of us are ready and some of us are not."

Let's repeat: Clinton "blinked back her misty dread of where Obama's 'false hopes' will lead us."

The problem is, she didn't. Clinton used the phrase "false hopes" on Jan. 4, according to Reuters, and again on Jan. 5. She may have used it on other occasions prior to New Hampshire's Jan. 8 primary. But despite Dowd's obvious insinuation, she didn't use it in the run-up to her emotional moment in Portsmouth. And neither did her questioner. From CNN's write-up of that incident:

At the close of a Portsmouth campaign stop, Marianne Pernold-Young, 64, asked Clinton: "How do you do it? How do you keep up ... and who does your hair?" [NOTE: here's another version of the question.]

Clinton said she had help with her hair on "special days," and that she drew criticism on the days she did not.

Then she added: "It's not easy, and I couldn't do it if I just didn't, you know, passionately believe it was the right thing to do.

"You know, I have so many opportunities from this country, I just don't want to see us fall backwards," she said, her voice breaking a bit. The audience applauded.

"This is very personal for me, it's not just political, it's [that] I see what's happening, we have to reverse it," she said emotionally, adding that some "just put ourselves out there and do this against some pretty difficult odds.

"But some of us are right and some of us are wrong. Some of us ready and some of us are not. Some of us know what we will do on day one, and some of us really haven't thought that through enough."

Don't get me wrong: those closing lines are pretty obvious shots at Obama. But hammering her main rival after a rare show of emotion--one elicited by an ostensibly personal, non-political question--is different than Dowd's imaginary scenario, in which Clinton chokes up because the prospect of an Obama presidency is so painful to contemplate. (For one thing, Dowd's framework--in which Obama-induced tears are quickly followed by a nasty Obama-directed jibe--hints strongly that the whole episode was staged.)

Sloppy stuff.

  • mary j graham said:

    You're being far too literal. The "false hopes'' line had become well-known by then, at least to intelligent readers, so the reference did not begin to imply she said those words in that moment. Or even that she was the one who said it. It had become the Clinton attack theme. It was context.

       If someone covers a speech by Bill and alludes to "I didn't inhale,'' does the writer have to clarify that he said it in the past? Of course not.

      The real scandal here is that the Phoenix's media criticism is being written in a dumbed-down fashion.

    January 14, 2008 10:05 PM
  • Adam said:

    "Context," eh? You're a generous reader, Mary.

    January 14, 2008 11:47 PM
  • k said:

    Um...that's why she's an op-ed writer and not a reporter. Good op-ed writers make an art of the kind of "sloppiness" you're suggesting Dowd of succombing to.

    And in any case, as Mary suggests, that the "false hopes" reference would have been picked up by most readers.

    January 15, 2008 2:10 AM
  • Wenalway said:

    Let's all keep finding ways NOT to cover the real issues of this campaign. After all, the coverage of the last two campaigns worked out SO WELL.

    Hey, if the media keep this up, maybe the country can be so messed up it'll take 20 years or more to fix. And then the drooling jokers in the media can pat themselves on the back for being so much smarter than the officeholders.

    Oh, and designers aren't journalists. Never have been, never will be. (Had to tack that on.)

    January 15, 2008 4:53 AM
  • Rick in Duxbury said:

    Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

    January 15, 2008 2:52 PM
  • LooseyGoosey said:

    Very literal. Very unknowing

    January 17, 2008 3:23 AM

Leave a Comment

Login | Not a member yet? Click here to Join

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  






Wednesday, October 08, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group