LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        
Media Log - Ron Borges' sticky fingers


Monday, March 05, 2007


Ron Borges' sticky fingers


Yesterday, the web site Cold, Hard Football Facts accused Globe sportswriter Ron Borges of lifting mass quantities of Tacoma News Tribune sportswriter Mike Sando's Feb. 25 piece on Seattle Seahawks' wide receiver Darrell Jackson (a possible Patriots target) in his March 4 "Football Notes." Some examples provided by CHFF publisher Kerry Byrne (who, to be fair, is a card-carrying Ron Borges Hater):
On Feb. 25, Mike Sando [emph. added here and elsewhere] wrote (14th & 15th paragraphs):
Jackson was leading the NFL in touchdowns last season when a turf-toe injury forced him to miss the final three games. The injury prevented Jackson from achieving his third 1,000-yard season in four years and the fourth overall.
 
Jackson still led the Seahawks with 63 catches for 956 yards and 10 touchdowns.
 
On March 4, Ron Borges wrote (2nd paragraph):
Jackson was leading the NFL in touchdowns last season when a turf-toe injury forced him to miss the final three games. The injury prevented him from reaching his third 1,000-yard season in four years, but Jackson still led Seattle with 63 catches for 956 yards and 10 touchdowns.
 
On Feb. 25, Sando wrote (16th & 17th paragraphs):
But trouble arose in March 2004 when former Seahawks president Bob Whitsitt allegedly shorted Jackson on a contract offer. Jackson said he signed the deal anyway at the urging of his father, who has since died. Whitsitt has dismissed the charge as preposterous, while Ruskell has resisted honoring a promise that a predecessor denies making.
 
The dispute has escalated ever since, with the Seahawks and Jackson’s agents exchanging a series of blunt letters, sources said.
 
On March 4, Borges wrote (3rd paragraph):
Trouble arose with Seahawks management two years ago after former team president Bob Whitsitt allegedly shorted Jackson on a contract offer. Jackson said he signed the deal anyway at the urging of his father. Whitsitt has dismissed the charge as preposterous, while present club president Tim Ruskell has refused to honor a promise that another person denies making. The dispute has escalated, with the Seahawks and Jackson's agents exchanging blunt letters.
 
On Feb. 25, Sando wrote (18th paragraph):
When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team’s offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.
 
On March 4, Borges wrote (4th paragraph):
When Ruskell became Seahawks president in February 2005, one of his first moves was to issue a letter to players outlining his expectations. He urged full participation in the team's offseason program, including minicamps, but Jackson let it be known he would honor his contract, but nothing more. Jackson subsequently skipped the voluntary portions of minicamps.
While you're pondering this parallelism, here's another wrinkle: as Byrne notes, the following explanation--which seems to give Borges wide latitude to appropriate other people's work--appears at the bottom of his column: "material from personal interviews, wire services, other beat writers, and league and team sources was used in this report."

I'm awaiting comment from Globe editor Marty Baron and Borges himself, and will post it as soon as I get it.


3/5/2007 11:08:00 AM by Adam Reilly | Comments [4] |  
Tracked by:
http://thebiglead.com/?p=1893 [Pingback]



Monday, March 05, 2007 2:28:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Don't think there's much wiggle room here for Globe/Borges. Acknowledging that you might have used some unidentified outlets for source material is one thing, but failing to disclose that you actually did no reporting and simply lifted wholesale sections of a previousy published article is quite another. Buh-bye.
Billy
Monday, March 05, 2007 2:41:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
That footer does not come close to covering Borges. All that says is he didn't do all of the reporting: others provided input. That is not a licence to plagarize.
Former newsie
Monday, March 05, 2007 7:18:09 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
He is so critcal of others - I wonder if he'll have the stones to confront this and face it like the tough guy he portrays himself as. I think it is pretty clear he lifted the story...

The Globe which sits on its high horse will be forced to do something. I concur with the previous poster - buh-bye, Ron. There's hope - you can go work for the Herald.
Mike D
Monday, March 05, 2007 8:05:55 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Three months on the bench. That's what plagarism costs these days? It used to be grounds for termination, but no more.
Billy
Comments are closed.
INFO

RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Send mail to the author(s)
The Phoenixs daily look at the news and how it's presented, both locally and nationally.

LINKS

RECENT
ADVERTISEMENT

ARCHIVE



CATEGORIES

EXCLUSIVE

TOOLS
Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe with Bloglines

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Hype Machine

MP3 Blogs

del.icio.us/OnTheDownload

Add to Google








TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group