The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

In the raw

Exploring GRO Café's uncooked cuisine
By BRIAN DUFF  |  May 20, 2009

gro main
NOTHING OVER 112 DEGREES Raw food has its limits.
Photo by Rebecca Golfine

The new GRO Café offers a vegan menu on which (almost) nothing has been heated beyond 112 degrees. This is supposed to preserve something raw-foodists call "living enzymes," which they imagine to be important to our health. Technically that is nonsense. But that is not reason to dismiss GRO out of hand. Cultists with an attachment to pseudo-scientific ideas are responsible for some of history's greatest cultural achievements. The Christian-creationists who built the breathtaking Chartres Cathedral in France come to mind. But it's hard to get a good meal in the village of Chartres (I tried), and it's a little too hard to get one at GRO as well.

GRO CAFÉ | 437 Congress St, Portland | Mon-Sat 10 am-8 pm | cash only | 207.541.9119

It is rare that a cult gets things as completely wrong as the raw-food movement. With the exception of fruits, which best serve their evolutionary purpose by being eaten, plants would prefer us animals leave their other parts alone. So plants have evolved to contain a host of natural defenses to their successful digestion: oxalates, antithiamines, avidins, phytates, cyanogens, goitrogens, protease inhibitors, and amylase inhibitors. Cooking helps defeat these defenses. Anthropologist Richard Wrangham offers compelling evidence that it was the discovery of cooking that allowed Homo sapiens to flourish while our evolutionary cousins became extinct.

Even without cooking, GRO Café may evolve and flourish too. What they do well is good enough to build upon successfully. The sesame noodles made from zucchini, for example, offered a nice contrast in texture to crisp carrot and celery. The almond Thai sauce was not too thick or sweet. Little nori dumplings were sort of interesting, though their nutty, garlicky, bright green paste was a touch too dense. The best part about a salad (a bit steep at $9) was, tellingly, the sun-cooked tomatoes. They were tender, glistening, sharp, and sour-sweet with a nice chewiness. And though the in-house mushroom-grower — featuring wet clumps of bacterial sawdust — looks depressing, the shiitake on the salad were tender and delicious. The "cheese caprice" — dense, tangy, yellow little pucks propped on slices of tomato — were not bad. Served next to a small salad in a cup made from cucumber, it was the best-looking dish.

But there are things to improve. In the smallish sea veggie shiitake roll, the bitter collard wrap and seaweed aroma overwhelmed the other flavors. The mushrooms also get a bit lost in a too-sweet marinade when featured in an "Emma Goldman" sandwich, which replaces bread with two circles of wettish undercooked tortilla. But the Goldman was better than the veggie-ball sub. Between two slices of dryish bread sit two small piles of diced-up seeds and nuts barely held together by some sort of paste. The uncooked herbs impart a slightly metallic aftertaste. The "sundried tomato and basil marinara" that topped it looked and tasted more like a sprinkling of diced fresh tomato.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Editors' picks: Food, Veggies delight, Small plates, More more >
  Topics: Restaurant Reviews , Culture and Lifestyle, Food and Cooking, Foods,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: In the raw
I'm not sure it makes sense for the lone food critic at the only alternative weekly serving Maine to be so publicly dismissive of an entire cuisine/diet. And after a two-paragraph intro that's entirely scornful and cynical ("nonsense", "cultists," "completely wrong") the compliments about a few of the menu items ring entirely hollow. Surely there were vaild things to criticize about this particular restaurant and perhaps some of the tenets of the raw-food movement (it's fine to share an informed opinion), but I found it all handled rather poorly: if a music reviewer kicked off a review of an experimental noise album with a snide, 200-word hissyfit about how lame the entire experimental-noise genre is, why bother reading the rest? I had always thought that the editorial mission of the Phoenix's reataurant/arts reviews was not so much to provide a soapbox for an individual writer to spout their own preferences, prejudices, and internal belief systems, but more to suss how well the chef/artist accomplishes what they intended to achieve. If someome opens an old-school Italian joint, the question should be: How much like mama's are your meatballs? Not: Italian places suck so this place sucks. That's not a question. I guess if you happen to open a restaurant or be working in an artistic genre -- especially an alternative one -- that a Phoenix reviewer just happens not to like, as a whole, you are out of luck in terms of coverage in a very small media market.--Josh Rogers, An Omnivore Not Entirely Sold on the Raw-Food Movement Either
By Josh R on 05/27/2009 at 10:16:57
Re: In the raw
I'm glad to see science in a food article, especially since the raw food movement makes faux-scientific claims about the benefits of its cuisine.   
By Amandable on 06/03/2009 at 10:37:32
Re: In the raw

Brian seems personally offended by the raw food movement, and thinks this animosity is an informed and reasonable reaction against the GRO establishment itself. He thinks raw food is a religion and revels in his "atheistic" reaction against "pseudo-science," yet writes a review that is far more bizarre than any claim GRO might make about food. Brian suggests that raw food necessitates a blind belief system as mystical as creationism. Raw food is not based on mythology thousands of years old, it is based on science that is as credible as Wrangham's work. Have you seen "Supersize Me"? Eating plants feels good, it is not a religion.
 
His dismissal of GRO (and the whole movement in general) is so emotional that the review of the food itself looses credibility for me. While GRO may have several things to learn from experienced critics, I got the impression that I was reading the review of a squeamish kid who doesn't like what he's eating cuz its new and he doesn't know what it is. Also, the Phoenix should know that its reader base is largely made up of a burgeoning element that healthily explores anti-consumer trends. Most Phoenix readers will probably not let an angry critique effect their preference for local veggies.

The last paragraph is particularly interesting. No quote in GRO glamorizes violence or blames victims of oppression, and most thinking people do find the politics of personal purity of utmost importance, and respect other people who do too. Also, it is not true that eating food that is hard to digest will keep you thin. Twinkies are hard to digest, yet they make you fat and give you diabetes.

By drobertson on 06/05/2009 at 3:33:17

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY BRIAN DUFF
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   SOME STRONG CHOICES  |  November 25, 2009
    A pan-Asian restaurant comes in handy if you are having trouble making a decision. But thanks to several openings in the last year, Portlanders looking for a menu with several Asian cuisines will have to make a choice.
  •   TRIPLE SHOT  |  November 04, 2009
    As a sign of difficult economic times, a turnover in cafés is a noisy indicator but a significant one.
  •   BRAVE NEW WORLD  |  October 28, 2009
    How many marriages are born or nursed in our city’s bars?
  •   SOLID FOOD, FOUND  |  October 07, 2009
    The Lost Coin Café is unlike any other restaurant in Portland.
  •   GUSTATION JUNCTION  |  September 30, 2009
    Since all three of Harding Lee Smith's restaurants are on corners, one wonders why he chose to name his newest one The Corner Room.

 See all articles by: BRIAN DUFF

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group