The dangerous irrelevance of President George W. Bush
By EDITORIAL | January 26, 2007
IT’S GETTING HOT IN HERE: Bush can shuck and jive all he wants — his environmental and Iraq policies are dangerously inadequate. |
Despite the hype, despite the hoopla, most State of the Union speeches are duds: laundry lists of political initiatives that — even if sincerely offered — have little or no chance of becoming reality. On Tuesday, President George W. Bush delivered his own version of the traditional dud before the first Congress of his six-year presidency to be controlled by the Democrats. Yet the Democrats’ slight balance of congressional power has little to do with their blurry vision and much to do with the nation’s growing disillusionment.The nation today has less faith in Bush than ever. His approval rating is at a new low — as pathetic as Nixon’s was during Watergate — hovering at around 28 percent, according to some major polls. Scooter Libby, former top aide to Vice-President Dick Cheney, who is on trial for lying to investigators about who blew the cover of a CIA operative, alleges that Karl “Svengali” Rove framed him. And Senate Republicans are in the early stages of open revolt against Bush’s disastrous war, with defense hard-liner John Warner of Virginia joining a resolution that calls the increase of troops in Iraq harebrained, albeit in very polite language. All things considered, the prospects for the Texas dude rancher look grim.
Bush pulled out all the stops when he strode before Congress. He oozed snake-oil charm as he congratulated House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for being the first woman in history to capture the office, the nation’s third highest. His insincerity was on full display when he morphed from his usual pose as a gun-slinging strongman into a sensitive guy bent on political cooperation. And his shysterism was front and center when he offered a series of insincere and inadequate pro-environment proposals.
Anyone doubting the inadequacies of Bush’s environmental talk should note that just hours before he spoke, the heads of 10 major corporations (including Alcoa, DuPont, and British Petroleum) urged the adoption of standards far more stringent than Bush’s to combat global warming. The chief executives called for mandatory ceilings on greenhouse-gas emissions, something Bush will not consider. It is a sad day for Republicans when a rabid, pro-business president like Bush is upstaged and outflanked by the core of his GOP constituency. It appears that it is beginning to dawn on at least some big businesses that if the planet shrivels up and dies, there will be nobody to whom they can sell their goods and services. This belated fit of enlightened self-interest is, of course, welcome. Too bad Bush doesn’t seem to understand just how much must be done — and how quickly.
Bush is less interested in the environment than he is in tapping into the growing sense among his base of militantly Christian evangelicals and fundamentalists that environmental damage and global warming pose threats of biblical proportions. Bush’s inner Rove always tells him to play to his base, to shore up support among his most faithful. He has been moving in this direction for about two years, longer than most people realize. And his tepid embrace of a green agenda more or less coincides with the point when the issue gained traction among his most conservative religious followers. Public expectations, however, are outstripping — have outstripped — Bush’s actions.
Related:
From Vietnam to Iraq, Goodbye, cruel America, Iraq: Five years later and time to go, More 
- From Vietnam to Iraq
Getting rid of defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld was relatively easy compared with how painfully difficult it is going to be to get the United States out of Iraq.
- Goodbye, cruel America
Toward the end of 2006, we woke up to the glad news that Chile’s former strongman Augusto Pinochet had saved everyone the trouble of hanging his sickly carcass for war crimes and atrocities by dying of a heart attack.
- Iraq: Five years later and time to go
March 19 will mark the fifth anniversary of America’s war in Iraq.
- Four years later
In the aftermath of a surprise attack by Egypt and Syria that overwhelmed Israeli forces in 1973, a special commission was convened to determine what went wrong.
- More mush from the wimps
The reaction to the call by Democratic Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin to censure President Bush for violating national law by conducting warrantless domestic surveillance clearly demonstrates two things.
- Warring parties
Regarding your editorial on George W. Bush’s rejiggered Iraq policy, let us see what our cowardly congressional representatives do: will they simply hold a few hearings in an attempt to pacify the masses? Or will they take action against an administration that makes Nixon’s appear contrite?
- Mugged by reality
Lesser mortals are captive to the world, but supermen make their own reality.
- Iraq: Five years later
Five years later, President George Bush and his minions were wrong about the need to fight in Iraq, wrong about the way to fight in Iraq, and wrong about what the war in Iraq would ultimately cost.
- Finley provocatively pairs George and Martha
In the world according to Karen Finley, George W. Bush’s Oedipal complex propelled the US invasion of Iraq, and the infantile president carries on an imagined long-running affair with domestic diva Martha Stewart.
- McCain’s crooked talk on torture
It might surprise some that McCain’s record in opposing torture and the Bush administration’s terror-war approach is more complicated than his comments suggest.
- Hillary, Barack, and Iraq
If prescience about the disaster in Iraq were a prerequisite for presidential front-runner status, former Vermont governor and current chair of the Democratic National Committee Howard Dean would be the donkey to beat in his party’s race for the White House.
- Less
Topics:
The Editorial Page
, U.S. Congressional News, Politics, U.S. Politics, More
, U.S. Congressional News, Politics, U.S. Politics, Science and Technology, George W. Bush, Nature and the Environment, Sciences, Environmental Protection, U.S. Republican Party, Dick Cheney, Less
