The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

Phantom of the Oprah

Letters to the Boston editor: February 24, 2006
By EDITORIAL  |  February 23, 2006

Thanks for your brave, spot-on cover story about Oprah Winfrey and her malign power (“Citizen Oprah,” February 10). Oprah is and has always been a complete sham. Generous, charitable people, as Winfrey repeatedly purports herself to be, do not live in $55 million mansions. That’s why those who can actually think for themselves (unlike the folks at CNN, apparently) pay no attention whatsoever to a single fucking thing she says or “endorses.”

Jason Roush
Cambridge

We are appalled by your recent cover art featuring Oprah. By illustrating an influential woman of color as a hyper-sexualized, Kong-esque monster, you have succeeded in making a racist, sexist statement before readers even open your pages. Congratulations. You’ve encouraged us to stop reading the Phoenix and turn on the television.

Ann Crews Melton and Molly Williams
Jamaica Plain

Editors’ note: The cover of our February 10 issue was based on the poster art for the cult classic Attack of the 50 Ft. Woman (1958).

How come no one asks whether Bill Gates (the richest man in the world), Donald Trump, George W. Bush, and other REALLY powerful people in America are “too powerful”? Is it because most of the others are white and male (and some are not famous celebrities), so you feel more comfortable with that? I wonder.

I notice the vehemence with which you commented about Oprah Winfrey’s recent response to and apology for the James Frey controversy. It is obvious that you hate Oprah and the ground she stands on. Why do you resent her power so much? At first when she stood by Frey, almost all of you in the media condemned her for supporting the embattled, lying author. Then when she admitted she had made a mistake, apologized, and took him to task for deceiving her and millions of readers, some of you accused her of bullying him just to protect her brand. As a wise businesswoman, why shouldn’t she?

I think there are some underlying racist and sexist motives for this anti-Oprah campaign. I think some white people — particularly some men who didn’t particularly care for her before anyway — squirmed at the idea of seeing a black woman on TV reprimanding and holding a white man accountable. That shift of power (based on America’s racist history) makes some people incredibly uneasy.

Many of us will tolerate some level of success in others. But if someone surpasses our wildest imagination of achievement and accomplishment, we feel inadequate about ourselves, which results in the proverbial “green envy”. If someone climbs “too high,” we feel the need to tear him/her down to make our sorry selves feel better. They say that is human nature, but one hopes that our spiritual evolvement allows us instead to be happy for others’ success (especially if the person is trying to use his/her success for some good) and to use others’ accomplishments for our own inspiration to be better.

If the media covered the lies told by US politicians and corporate America over the last few years with half of the energy they did with this story, what a wonderful country we would have. There are more critical, life-impacting issues to scrutinize. That’s what really matters — get some perspective!

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Attack of the 50-foot Oprah, Busted, Silence of the lambs, More more >
  Topics: Letters , Celebrity News, Entertainment, George W. Bush,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Phantom of the Oprah
Business Week ranked Oprah as the most generous black in American history after she gave NINE FIGURES of her OWN MONEY to charity. The talk show genre she so brilliantly popularized and revolutionized made gays and transsexuals mainstream according to Yale sociologist Joshua Gamson. I understand that a lot of people are jealous of all her money, power, and fanatical fans but she has made the world a better place. I think she's a marketing genius, a brilliant improvisational entertainer, and a great humanitarian.
By oprahfan on 03/07/2006 at 12:07:26

ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   WHALIN' ON PALIN  |  November 24, 2009
    Give Sarah Palin this: she isn’t driven by polls. If she wanted to improve her chances at political success, she would have used her book and promotional tour to convince America that she has substance and gravitas .
  •   TAXING CATHOLICS  |  November 18, 2009
    Should the Roman Catholic Church, and the various subsidiary groups and organizations that exist under its umbrella and operate at its direction, be entitled to state- and federal-tax exemptions?
  •   COAKLEY TAKES A STAND  |  November 18, 2009
    Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley this week separated herself from the gang of essentially like-minded candidates seeking to fill Senator Ted Kennedy's Washington seat by rejecting the US House of Representatives compromise that traded approval of a health-care-reform bill for greater restrictions to abortion access. Good for Coakley.
  •   MENINO, AGAIN  |  November 04, 2009
    At a time when Americans are racked by anxiety about the uncertain future of a weak economy, Boston voters handily returned Boston Mayor Thomas Menino to an unprecedented fifth term.
  •   FOR MAYOR: VOTE FLAHERTY + YOON  |  November 04, 2009
    Boston’s mayoral candidates are running campaigns that are variations on a theme.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group