The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
50_bands_2009_providence

Is RI making the most from its tourism appeal?

Critics call a variety of agencies a wasteful approach in this small state
By IAN DONNIS  |  July 24, 2008
Daveinside.jpg
BIG BANG: DePetrillo (left) and Mark G. Brodeur, director of operations for the state Division of
Tourism, say the state gets a big return based on a relatively small tourism budget.

Even those with an appropriately dim view of quintessential Rhode Island boondoggles can agree that the Ocean State has a lot to offer — great beaches, superb restaurants, good nightlife,dynamic arts and culture, a rich sense of history, and a mix of urban and rural settings within short proximity, all tied together with considerable idiosyncrasy.

So if you were going to promote this plate of attractions to potential visitors in other states, what would be the best way to do it?

It’s no small question, for several reasons. Tourism was the source of an estimated $5.6 billion in spending in Rhode Island in 2006, and it’s among the state’s largest in-dustries. And while the smallest state remains a regional laggard when it comes to boosting economic development (see “Can’t anybody here play this game?” News, May 21), Rhode Island’s charms — particularly at a time when higher gas prices are encouraging vacationers to travel closer to home — would seem to offer a potential source for en-hancing state revenue.

When WJAR-TV (Channel 10) recently reported that the state’s toll-free call center for requesting a tourism brochure is located in Missouri, it raised the question of why that op-eration isn’t based here.

And to critics, the array of different entities working to promote tourism — a branch of the state Economic Development Corporation; the Providence/Warwick Convention & Visitors Bureau; five independent tourism councils; and city-based departments in Warwick and Providence — represent a wasteful excess of resources, particularly in such a small state.

Ultimately, though, things are less clear-cut. The Missouri-based call center, for example, will be phased-out before year’s end, mostly because the state’s tourism Web site, visitrhodeisland.com, has emerged as the preferred information source for tourism inquiries. Meanwhile, Channel 10’s ombudsman found that the station botched part of its report: although a Blackstone Valley Tourism Council call center representative suggested “Federal Hill” when a reporter asked about a destination for Italian restaurants, the sta-tion indicated that it was not initially steered in that direction.

The issue of the numerous councils and departments devoted to tourism is more complex. To some, it’s a clear example of Rhode Island’s traditional hyper-localizing of the delivery of services (schools, police, fire, etc.), in defiance of a more efficient approach. Defenders, who also cite a need to preserve the state’s traditional character, contend the local tourism councils remain best-suited for promoting the distinct attractions of particular regions.

Both sides have legitimate points. It’s also the case that Rhode Island, whose tourism budget is small in comparison with other states, could likely generate a greater return with a bigger investment.

As the Ocean State continues to wrestle with budget woes, the bottom line is that the current approach to promoting tourism isn’t going to change any time soon, leaving un-answered the question of whether there might be a better way.

The making of a new industry
Rhode Island’s tourism industry grew out of necessity — such as the growing economic vacuum dramatized by a major cutback of the US Navy’s Newport presence in 1973. Ten years later, in the same year when the America’s Cup race left Newport, the state held its first governor’s conference on tourism, sparking years of robust growth in that sector.

A recent state-commissioned report by Global Insight found that one of every 10 Rhode Islanders owes their job to tourism; that about eight million visitors came from a dis-tance of greater than 50 miles in 2006; that Rhode Island keeps 61 cents of every dollar spent by visitors; that approximately 40 percent of local restaurant revenue is due to visitors; and that tourism is responsible for five percent of the state’s total gross product.

Back in the ’80s, as awareness spread about the economic value of tourism, chambers of commerce around the state helped to bring about the rise of the state’s regional tourism councils, says David C. DePetrillo, the state’s longtime director of Tourism. “It wasn’t a homogenous tourism concept,” DePetrillo says. “We were trying to work with local people and contacts. I think it was a natural progression.”

Asked whether the current approach involving a bevy of independent tourism councils is wasteful, DePetrillo responds by noting how the General Assembly designated a per-centage of the state hotel tax for the groups in 1986. “If legislators felt it was important, I think it’s important for us to work with each of these organizations,” he says. DePetrillo, who does not perceive duplication of efforts between the state Tourism division and the regional councils, says the two groups work closely together on a regular basis.

One observer points to what he calls an unprecedented amount of collaboration among different tourism concerns, such as an effort in which the Providence/Warwick Convention & Visitors Bureau is reaching out to taxi drivers, concierge desk personnel, and others who interact with tourists to update them on local events.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: A win-wind situation, Power play, Casino battle royale, More more >
  Topics: News Features , U.S. Government, U.S. State Government, Culture and Lifestyle,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Is RI making the most from its tourism appeal?
Tourism should be seen as a State product - and any business operator knows that without a strong product, any amount of marketing will not create sustained revenue in the long-term. Community development, a.k.a. product development, should be the first and foremost goal of any tourism planner, and to assume that ad-space will be the solution to revenue numbers is naive. It will not change the facts on the ground - small business support (training, loans, etc.), public works developments, historical and facade improvements, cultural interpretation, environmental preservation, social justice - these are the tenants of sustainable tourism.If there were to be no regional tourism councils, I fear the state would market only Providence and Newport (as suggested by the Gov. in 2003). But tourism as a form of economic development should be democratic and the benefits enjoyed by everyone. The unique councils should be given more support - teaming up with the local Planning and Redevelopment Agencies, social and environmental organizaitons, and support from RIEDC as an alternative to industrial parks and suburban real-estate developments. Will a single state tourism structure support tourism and hospitality related industries in Central Falls, Olneyville, Foster, Exeter and Hope Valley? If it was left up to Providence and Newport marketing alone, some areas would be inundated with black-socked tourists staying at chain-hotels while other areas would never see an out-of-state license plate again.Manufacturing and Industry is 20th century - the future is Service and Technology. Let's provide the support and infrastructure our communities need. While tourism is not the entire answer, it is a part of the solution - Regional Tourism Councils and sustainable destination development is how to give the dollars back to the little-guy.
By sommerstylee on 07/24/2008 at 1:11:43
Re: Is RI making the most from its tourism appeal?
The City of Pawtucket strongly supports a regional tourism development approach to promote the uniqueness of each district.  Each region of the state is distinct.  Can one agency accomplish this? Several years ago, an Op Ed written by Mayor Doyle and Mayor Avedisian was published by several papers detailing these Cities opposition to a central governmental system.  Our State Tourism Division works extremely closely with each Tourism District and City and Town to promote their distinct features despite having their budget cut every year. Here's my question to Mr. Bob Burke...Would a single tourism agency (minus the Tourism Distsricts) be able to accomplish what we do today?   Nine CIties and towns work effeciently in the Blackstone Valley to develop tourism. Would a single tourism agency (minus the Tourism Districts) promote all restaurants in the state or just those in Providence and in Federal Hill?  While Mr. Burke may say no, there are many throughout the Ocean State who believe that this would not be the case.  I hope that Bob Burke will come visit Pawtucket and learn about our growing artist community.  I will even take him out to lunch at a Pawtucket restaurant of his choice. 
By hweissri on 07/24/2008 at 12:44:58

ARTICLES BY IAN DONNIS
Share this entry with Delicious

 See all articles by: IAN DONNIS

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group