The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

Gen Jones rules

But will they be practical problem solvers or scatterbrains on steroids?
By STEVEN STARK  |  March 19, 2009

090320_stark_main

One of the major themes of Barack Obama's political philosophy has been that it's time for America to move beyond the Baby Boom Generation's petty partisanship. In The Audacity of Hope, he wrote that when he observed politics in his younger days, "I sometimes felt as if I were watching the psychodrama of the Baby Boom Generation — a tale rooted in old grudges and revenge plots hatched on a handful of college campuses long ago — played out on the national stage."

Once he became a presidential candidate, Obama picked up on the theme. "I think there is no doubt that we represent the kind of change that Senator Clinton can't deliver on, and part of it is generational," he said. In a key article boosting Obama in December of 2007, Andrew Sullivan in the Atlantic argued that Obama "could take America — finally — past the debilitating, self-perpetuating family quarrel of the Baby Boom Generation that has long engulfed all of us."

So Obama, even though some would technically still consider him a late baby boomer (or part of the transitional "Generation Jones" — born in 1961) became the president of a new generation, boosted by strong support among an even younger generation. In the White House, he has surrounded himself with his generational cohort, including Rahm Emanuel (two years older) and Tim Geithner (same age as the president).

By looking at the characteristics of Obama's generation, we can learn a lot about the leaders we're putting our faith in. The result? We might be on the verge of either the first "Blackberry Presidency" or, figuratively, a "Steroid Presidency."

What characterizes the Obama generation? To its boosters, like Jonathan Pontell, author of the "Generation Jones" construct, they (people born in the mid-1950s to the mid-'60s) are "practical idealists," tempered by growing up in a world in which many of their parents were more interested in self-fulfillment than they were in their children. That meant that, as latch-key kids stuck in front of the TV or left to their own devices, they had to master their own destiny at an early age the best they could.

"Where the Boomers naively tried to change the system and the Xers in a sense walked away from the system, my generation used the system to get what we wanted," Pontell told a reporter. "It's like the Boomers never realized they were playing the game, the Xers folded their cards, and my generation was wise to the game but said deal the cards anyway."

Spinning it all positively, a post–Baby Boomer sees a problem or opening and solves it. That's certainly a trait one would want in a president right now and Obama demonstrated he had it by "audaciously" running for the presidency at such an early stage of his career.

Then there's this generation's love of technology and "the new," forged in Andrew Thompson's words "out of a lifetime of upgrading from Atari to Nintendo to Sega to Xbox." Thompson, who writes the blog Gen-X Rising (genxrising.com), wrote perceptively of his generation (and he considers the slightly older Obama a compatriot), "We . . . were shaped by rapid technological change smack-dab in the middle of our most formative years. And that molded the way we understand the world in which we live."

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: The ‘A’ word, That’s what he said, Emasculation proclamation, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Barack Obama, Barack Obama, Politics,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Gen Jones rules
I was enjoying your essay until I got to this part: "But is [President Obama's] generation's tech addiction part of the reason why he has such difficulty focusing on the one great economic problem facing the nation, choosing instead to push a 27-part agenda?" I re-read the essay and found not a single mention of any data supporting your contention that he is having any such difficulty. How did you reach this conclusion?  Did you just assume he is because he is doing more than one thing at a time and thought it justified the sociological theories you described?  What you seem to describe as ADD seems to me to be a president who is smart, thoughtful, and able to walk and chew gum at the same time.  Good thing, too, because we have a number of problems, few of which can wait until the economic problem is fixed and for which the solutions, if implemented properly, will contribute to our economic recovery, both short-term and long-term. We are also blessed with a president with experience in the classroom, which I believe is why he is spending a fair amount of time explaining to us (with IMO excellent effect) how we got into this mess in the first place, knowledge that should help us to stay out of such a predicament again. I want President Obama to address many things at once, particularly when those things are both interdependent and necessary for the foundations of our future.  I suspect I'm not alone.
By JBL in Maine on 03/20/2009 at 10:05:16
Re: Gen Jones rules
JBL writes: "I suspect I'm not alone" No, you are most certainly not alone, JBL. Maybe Stark is so used to the massive incompetencies of the Bush Presidency, which featured a man who couldn't manage one thing at a time well, much less several, that it is impossible for the writer to imagine someone who can multi-task. This is not the Generation Jones rule. Generation Jones? Never heard of it. No, this is the age of multi-tasking. I'm doing a lot more than writing this response right now. We need a president who can respond to the MultiTask Generation. And, finally, we have one.
By TheArtfulDodger on 03/20/2009 at 10:51:43

ARTICLES BY STEVEN STARK
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? YES, HE HAS  |  November 12, 2009
    To listen to some pundits, Barack Obama's public image began taking a serious beating when the off-year election returns came in a week ago. Or maybe it was the undeserved Nobel Prize, his approach to the war in Afghanistan, or when he revved up his pursuit of national health-care reform.
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    Since Iceland is something of the epicenter of the global financial crisis — its government being the first to essentially go belly up — it's probably not surprising that the Icelanders have come up with the most novel and interesting theory as to what caused the meltdown. And they may be right.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    So, Arlen Specter is now a Democrat. That's old news.
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    A tension lies at the heart of the Obama presidency. After 100 days in office, the public still seems uncertain how to interpret the historic nature of the election last November.
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    While political analysts understandably regard elections and politicians as the key forces of social change, nongovernmental forces are the ones that most often actually influence and transform our culture.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group