The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

Man bites newspaper

By STEVEN STARK  |  April 19, 2009

Entire organizations were formed to document liberal media bias. A book on the "liberal slant" of news coverage was often an instant ticket to the bestseller list. And, in the subsequent decades, whether in the hands of Rush Limbaugh (who, without any trace of irony, relentlessly attacked the "drive-by media") or with the rise of Fox News — which claimed to be objective in comparison to virtually everyone else — the movement grew. By 2004, the conservative Club for Growth could attack Democratic candidate (and later party head) Howard Dean by telling him to take his "tax-hiking, government-expanding, latte-drinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading, body-piercing, Hollywood-loving, left-wing freak show back to Vermont, where it belongs." (emphasis added) And everyone knew what the reference to the Times meant.

One of the great "successes" of the modern conservative movement has been the extent to which it has discredited and delegitimized mainstream journalism. So, the next time a reporter loses his or her job, you can go ahead and credit (or blame) the Internet and the economy. But without the legacy of Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew, the history and future of American journalism might be very different.

To read the "Stark Ravings" blog, go to thePhoenix.com/blogs/starkravings. Steven Stark can be reached at sds@starkwriting.com.

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Die another day, Red all over, Will the Globe survive?, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Media, Newspapers, Newspapers,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Man bites newspaper
Unfortunately, I think this piece misses the mark, and is emblematic of why newspapers are going under. That is, newspapers are based on a gatekeeper model of information distribution. Journalists may procure the information, but editors determine what is "fit to print." Now, though, everyone has seen the man behind the curtain -- and are unwilling to have their access to information diluted. For example, I live in Houston and read the Houston sports writers. Do I think they are good? Not particularly, but I like sports. They cover the beat. What is my complaint? They have the same world view as any other sports writer. Their audience really isn't me -- neither more or less papers will be sold because the Houston sports information consumers think the newspaper sports writers are good or bad. Thus, the sportswriters serve one master -- their editor. Keep him happy, and they keep their job. But, I can also get sports statistics faster now from online sources -- rather than having to wait for the newspaper. And I can mostly catch live feeds of sports I am interested (or clips) from cable or the internet. Further, for commentary, I can be involved in blogs -- and the network of bloggers tends to be able to provide more accuracy and insight than a single full time sports write can. And the bloggers are not curtailed by an editor's taste. We decide what's fit to print. And if offended, one can respond in kind. See, our resentment from the gatekeepers stem from their insularity and power. Remember the adage, "Don't ever get into an argument with someone who buys newsprint by the gallon." Well, the glee comes from having the might fall a bit -- and the resultant leveling of the playing field. Get back to serving the consumer, and not the gatekeepers -- and there will always be a market. The technology may change, but the demand, if anything, increases.
By victorwelch on 04/14/2009 at 6:01:09

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY STEVEN STARK
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   HAS OBAMA PEAKED? YES, HE HAS  |  November 12, 2009
    To listen to some pundits, Barack Obama's public image began taking a serious beating when the off-year election returns came in a week ago. Or maybe it was the undeserved Nobel Prize, his approach to the war in Afghanistan, or when he revved up his pursuit of national health-care reform.
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    Since Iceland is something of the epicenter of the global financial crisis — its government being the first to essentially go belly up — it's probably not surprising that the Icelanders have come up with the most novel and interesting theory as to what caused the meltdown. And they may be right.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    So, Arlen Specter is now a Democrat. That's old news.
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    A tension lies at the heart of the Obama presidency. After 100 days in office, the public still seems uncertain how to interpret the historic nature of the election last November.
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    While political analysts understandably regard elections and politicians as the key forces of social change, nongovernmental forces are the ones that most often actually influence and transform our culture.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group