
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
I really hope this is a joke.
If Shaughnessy thinks the people who log on to Schilling's blog are "fanboys" and "sycophants" — and most of them aren't, they're simply asking the questions that lazy, jaded journalists who hate baseball and get "bored" at spring training won't — he should take a look at this site.
As if the Derek Jeter ball-washing and the unflagging belief in "mystique and aura" over at NYYFans weren't enough, "Project A13: The Ant-Boos Movement" has the baseball world beat when it comes to blending towering arrogance and abject hero worship.
Its mission is two-fold: to stop the booing of this god among men, and to be the spark that restores him to his former omnipotent glory. "Now that
Alex has chosen to stay and fight, and we have chosen to be positive and
support him for this decision, what we must do now is believe."
He chose us, right? Definitely. He already had everything else in baseball.
How do you feel about choosing him? Purposeful – like I can do something good for him, and this team.
If everyone comes together, do you think he’ll rise? As long we believe, and Alex believes, I think we’ll all rise as one.
......
And that's really what this project is about, isn't it?
Coming together.
Being part of something that's bigger than ourselves...something
that we can all feel good about. Human beings by nature gravitate
towards one another—towards family and towards community—which is the
reason fans feel so much camaraderie in and amongst other fans. We can
all relate to each other's experiences, like appreciating the pride,
the joy, and the pain of our heroes' daily exploits. This is what makes
American Sport such a great outlet for life—especially baseball.
And where there are numbers, there is power, or so the saying goes.
Indeed, the power we hold in our hands, as a large, unified,
community of fans is incredible. How we wield this power and for what
purpose is our responsibility, and it's one that should not be taken
lightly. At our very worst, when we give in to the tabloids and the
experts and the negative thirst of the media, we have the ability to
destroy an athlete—to erode his confidence down to the point where his
mental game conflicts with the proper function of his physical game.
A.K.A., the current state of Alex Rodriguez: twenty-four errors, extended strikeout-filled slumps, .071 versus Detroit.
At our very best, when we rise above the primal urge to identify,
expose, and attack another man's weakness, we have the ability to lift
an athlete up off the dirt, put that confidence back in his bat, and
watch him feed off the positive energy to the tune of both personal and
public redemption—to the tune of greatness, if we let him. Are you ready to believe?
(Make sure the sound is on for optimal effect.)
Monday, March 26, 2007
So Dice-K threw five no-hit innings this afternoon. He also gave up five walks. He is not happy.
Craig Hansen, meanwhile, gave up five runs in less than an inning.
What are we gonna do with him?
Clearly, he is royally screwed up right now. Physically, mentally, and probably emotionally. He's all over the place.
Put me in the "start from scratch" camp. Send him up to Maine for the summer and let him relax. (Hell, enroll him in the Gritty's mug club if necessary.) Just keep him away from Fenway, and away from any more meddlesome wandering instructors. Set him up with one pitching coach who can work with him for as long as necessary to get back to where he was when we signed him.
And do it soon, before this gets any worse.
What a joke.
EDIT: This just in!
"Putting
his inherent 'toolness' on display for all the world to see..."
Man, it's fun living in this town sometimes.
Thursday, March 22, 2007
So, is it happening already? Or am I freaking out over nothing?
Not near a TV, but these reports from the SoSH game thread are a bit worrisome. "Is Papelbon throwing below 3/4 and closer to side arm or am I just seeing things?"
"It definitely looks like a different arm angle. Not quite side arm though..."
"I just came to post this. WTF is he doing?"
"Yep, he is throwing lower than normal, wierd." Could it be that he's changing his mechanics to protect his arm for the long haul? Is this possibly a good thing? No idea.
But you know what they say about "If it ain't broke?"
Maybe I just need to take a deep breath.
At least Schilling's not worried.
Just got
back from watching a few innings of the Red Sox-Phillies game on TV at Boston
Beer Works.
(Spring is in the air...home opener is in less than three weeks...Fenway
is getting spruced up and should be ready on time.)
Wake was
getting knocked around a bit, and Jamie Moyer was looking pretty good. Then Wily Mo
blasted one deeeeeep to left. (He also looks pretty good — VERY good — every
time he connects. Every other time, he looks awful.)
Later on,
Wakefield walked, Cora legged out an infield dink to third, and Youkilis,
whose goatee grows more frightening by the day, launched another one to make
the score 4-2.
Anyway,
about this time Papelbon was in the pen, tossing around a weighted yellow
softball. No surprise there. He was scheduled to relieve Wake this game. As the
camera fixed on him, the sound was off. I noticed they had ace reporter
Erin Andrews on the line, but could not hear what she was saying.
Now I do.
Papelbon is
gonna close.
I’d seen
the article in the Herald this morning, but just wrote it off as another bit
off filler as we ramp up to opening day. Sure, he might take the reigns if everyone else spits the bit.
But it
appears that, with a week-plus still left to go in spring training, the
decision has been made: Paps to the pen,
Tavarez will be the fifth starter.
Dunno about
you, but I’m nervous, nervous, nervous about this one.
Of course,
it serves a glaring need. And of course crazy JT is better starting (as he showed late last season) than
closing.
But this
strikes me as a move premised on desperation rather than confidence. The
official announcement has yet to be made, and there may be news that
I don’t know. But the whole reason we even considered slotting him in the
rotation was the regular workload that would ease the strain on his shoulder. Now,
before the season has even started, we’ve already signed him up for the
uneven, stressful workload of a Major League closer. What changed between yesterday and today?
Of course we know he can
handle it. He’s a gamer, and he spits nails. He wants to help any way he can.
But what
about his shoulder? If he has another “transient
subluxation event” I’m gonna puke. (“Transient upchuck-desperation event”?)
Believe me,
the thought of a hothead with control problems like Tavarez closing games gave
me fits, too. And if Papelbon can put together a season even approaching what he
did before he was shut down last year, then we’re in great shape — whether the
fifth starter is Tavarez, Lester (can we assume he's a lot further along than we'd hoped?), or even Snyder.
But I’d be
lying if I said this didn’t make me very, very uneasy.
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
So is Schilling gonna blog this one?
My favorite so far:
A close runner-up:
Dude, we’re definitely
gonna win the East.
Darrell Rasner?
Total freaking pwnage.
Ross
Ohlendorf? All his pitch are belong to us.
Am I worried at all that Wakefield looked very
shaky while Carl
Pavano (he of the bruised buttocks, strained shoulder, bad back, two broken
ribs, and elbow chips) suddenly looked actually kinda sorta decent?
Not a whit. Why should any of that
matter? We BEAT THE YANKEES in a very
important game.
Seriously, though, kudos
to the bullpen for a solid outing. Even if it was against titanic mashers
like Miguel Cairo and Bronson Sardinha.
Etc. How could Hart Brachen
miss this epochal showdown?
What is Manny hiding
under his helmet?
Poor
Youk. It’s gotta be tough living in Boston
on only $424,000 a year. (In fairness, though, he is hitting the snot of the
ball this spring. And it’s pretty kooky that his backup is making 13 times what
he is.)
Armando Benitez? No thanks.
Hideki Matsui’s head is
enormous.
Monday, March 12, 2007
"Because it was the Orioles, an AL East rival, 'I thought I'd take the
opportunity to experiment a little bit,' Matsuzaka said calmly through
translator Masa Hoshino. "See where they're going to hit the ball, see
where they wouldn't hit it. The third and fourth inning, I was
definitely experimenting.'"
Everyone just take a deep breath.
I'm looking at you, Pat D.
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
38pitches.com"I’ve been called everything from outspoken to blowhard to much, much
worse. I believe those labels spring out of the fact that I care about
the things people ask me as much as any other cause. I’ve never been a
yes/no kind of guy, which probably hasn’t been received well by some. I
don’t know that I’ll be changing my style, but I do know that getting
ripped for something I say here will be getting ripped for something I
actually said–with the entire contents of my comments included.
That’s not to say I’ll be preaching from the pulpit–far from it. Being
a major league baseball player does not give me keen insight into
politics, education, or anything else for that matter. It does give me
insight and knowledge about baseball, about being part of a team, about
excelling at something not many people can. Beyond that my thoughts and
beliefs are my own and for the most part pretty normal."
Friday, March 02, 2007

This is a few days old, but after I
saw it linked on Mnookin’s
blog, I just had to comment.
As Red Sox fans, we’re all
well-aware, and have been for some time, what a hacktastic hater of the Carmine
Hose Murray Chass really is. But one
recent New York Times column, in
which he loudly trumpets his ignorance of and disdain for sabermetric analysis must
be seen to be believed.
Like crotchety old Andy Rooney,
Chass lists the “things I don’t want to read or hear about anymore” as opening
day approaches. Last item on the list? VORP.
Fine, he’s old man, who came of age
in a time of chaw-stained scouting reports and cigar-smoky clubhouses. It’s
understandable that he’s not a card-carrying member of SABR. But for a newspaperman, this is
inexcusable:
To me, VORP epitomized
the new-age nonsense. For the longest time, I had no idea what VORP meant and
didn’t care enough to go to any great lengths to find out. I asked some
colleagues whose work I respect, and they didn’t know what it meant either.
Finally, not long ago, I
came across VORP spelled out. It stands for value over replacement player. How
thrilling. How absurd. Value over replacement player. Don’t ask what it means.
I don’t know.
I suppose that if stats
mongers want to sit at their computers and play with these things all day long,
that’s their prerogative. But their attempt to introduce these new-age
statistics into the game threatens to undermine most fans’ enjoyment of
baseball and the human factor therein.
People play baseball.
Numbers don’t.
It’s really breathtaking if you
think about it. Leave aside for a moment the wrong-headedness of his opinion. Here
is a man who is paid to write about a particular sport — presumably because he
knows more about that sport than most, and therefore what he has to say about
that sport is of more interest and pertinence than, say, the ravings of some
half-drunk blowhard calling in to WEEI.
And here is Chass, loudly braying
about how closed his mind is, how he’s too lazy to even “find out” what VORP
is, that he refuses to even think
about something that might be trouble his beautiful mind. As Mnookin puts it:
It’s been a good long
time since I’ve heard a reporter actually brag
about his total and utter lack of curiosity regarding his work. One of the
biggest changes in baseball over the last decade has been the emphasis on using
everything possible to understand the game. This doesn’t undermine enjoyment of
the game any more than learning the historical references contained in
Shakespeare plays leeches the enjoyment out of a night at the theatre.
Information is knowledge, as that hoary old cliché goes. Lord knows Murray ain’t much one for
knowledge — he practically shouts his ignorance from the rooftops every time he
puts pen to paper — but it’s embarrassing for him to beat his chest about it.
It’s one thing
for a guy like Joe Morgan to be utterly oblivious and hostile to these new ways of looking at the game. He’s “only” a broadcaster. But Chass is a respected
columnist for the paper of record. I’m not asking for him to embrace
sabermetric analysis, or even to like it. But for a baseball writer to be so
proud of his hidebound worldview is depressing, to say the least.
See also:
* Baseball
Prospectus’s “Open
Letter to Murray Chass”
* FireJoeMorgan’s
hilarious fisking of the
excerpt at hand. Best line:
Murray Chass: New age new age new age new age the end. My column's done!
Nurse: Very good, Murray! We're going out
into the garden now for some fresh air. The garden. Won't that be fun? * My interview with Baseball Prospectus's Steven Goldman, in which he reveals that — gasp! — statheads and scouts really can get along: "These are areas that are complementary to
each other. I don’t know if one should be supreme, you’ve just gotta
have an open mind and take in all the input that you can when making an
evaluation of a player."
What a revolutionary and dangerous concept.
*******
Meanwhile,
over at the Herald, Michael Silverman has done what no one thought was
possible.
Undaunted
by Manny Ramirez’s infamous reticence, he’s actually reported
an insightful and fair-minded story
about the enigmatic
slugger™
that tells us more about Manny than pretty much anything I’ve read in his
six-year tenure with this team.
Who woulda thunk? Instead of writing
column
after column
after column
blathering on and on about what a weird, selfish, weird, malingering, weird prima
donna weirdo the guy is, bemoaning the fact that he doesn’t talk to reporters
and that he’ll always — always! — be defended
by his sycophantic fanboys, Silverman did something different.
He wrote a column about why Manny is
so good. Why he’s a lock for Cooperstown. Why
he does what he does, and how he’s become the player he is. Manny wouldn’t
assent to an interview? Big deal. Silverman actually, like, went out and talked to the people who know him best:
Julian Tavarez, and the trainers with whom he spends nearly every waking hour.
Key excerpts:
Manny was being Manny
long before he came to Boston, and he’s going to keep on being Manny after he
leaves - and well after he delivers what is going to be one hell of a Hall of
Fame induction speech.
Ramirez can infuriate, he
can behave inexcusably and he can change his mind before he makes it up. In the
end, however, he wants to be one of the best hitters in baseball. That truth is
as plain and simple as Ramirez is.
Hiding in plain sight in
front of us since 2001, Ramirez reveals himself with a private, intense pregame
routine that has helped him master his craft.
To reach his goal (and he
is succeeding), Ramirez permanently wears blinders, shielding himself from the
rest of the world. He has decided that explaining himself or his methods is
pretty much a waste of time and energy - resources he’d rather devote to
getting better....
When Dave Page, the
strength and conditioning coach, hears the phone ring in his hotel room, he
usually can guess who’s on the other end.
“Every day in the
morning, he’ll call me and it’s, ’Meet me in the lobby at 10 o’clock,’” said
Page. “I’ve been in baseball for nine years in the major leagues, and by far,
Manny is the most consistent and most intense workout guy I’ve ever had. I
think he enjoys it. He comes in in the morning, lifts and works out, goes home
for some lunch and a nap, and then he’s back here, running with the pitchers
every day and then batting practice.
“I know he doesn’t like
to miss a day. If there’s a late game and we have a morning game the next day,
he still has to do something. It’s as much of a mental thing for him than it is
physical. He’s very loyal to his routine.”...
Tavarez cannot see or
understand Ramirez. He can only see what Ramirez cares about.
“People are good at
hiding things, to keep it inside, but I know that deep in his heart, he wants
to be one of the greatest players in the game,” said Tavarez. “If he doesn’t
want to be one of those great players, then why is he working so hard?
“He cares, he just is not
going to show it to you. He’s always going to give a smile, he’s always playing
around with the guys, but his mind is on the game.
“He’s got a lot of goals
in his head he wants to reach. He knows you’re not going to help him, I’m not
going to help him. He’s the one who has to do it with the bat, with (the)
intention, “I want it, I want it.” He says to himself that he wants it. I know,
because when he wants to do something, he’ll do it.”
I’ve sad it before, and I’ll say it
again. (And I will probably have to say it again after this.) Can’t we just
accept that the guy is a unique human being who likes to keep to himself? He’s
not mean. He’s not on the juice. He’s not a clubhouse cancer. He’s just Manny. Could
it be that so much this controversy over
the years, all those trade requests, might stem from the fact that he just doesn’t
like living under a microscope? Can’t we all just leave him alone, let him
train, and watch him hit?
I think we’d all be a lot happier.
Thursday, March 01, 2007
So is Curt Schilling changing the
name of his MMORPG company from Green
Monster Games to 38Studios so as to
distance himself from the Red Sox lest his final year is played in
another uniform?Let’s hope not. If the paltry 19
pitches he threw last night (18 fastballs and a slider) are any indication
whatsoever — and they may not be — it would behoove us to keep him around for a
while. Schill
looked crisp and sharp, throwing 15 of those tosses for strikes, giving up just
two hits and no runs.
And, like clockwork, that first
“start” of the season found him posting
online at SoSH almost as soon as the game was over:
Ah the game threads. As
much a right of passage as the game itself in this nation, great to be able to
check in again and see who's ripping whom :)
"Schill looks a
little pudgy"
Has there been a time,
since my embryonic state, that I haven't?
245 pds 9/28/06
243 pds 2/28/07
I'll shave 8 more off by
opening day but damned if I won't still look pudgy. Kapler I am not.
Point taken.
In other news...
I will be starting up my
own blog in the near future that I will be posting to frequently over the next
few years.
Aiming to tie in Shonda's
Shade Foundation, the ALS Association and the computer gaming company
as parts of it, background stuff really, while I post about baseball, and other
stuff people might like to read about.
Sweet! Shaughnessy must be tearing
his curly red hair out.
Other things we learned last night: Julian
Tavarez will not be the closer. (Or at least he shouldn’t be.)
But Brendan
Donnelly might. And Joel
Pineiro, despite giving up two hits and a run, looked intriguing.
And it was great to see Murphy (2
for 3 with a run scored), Pedroia (1 for 2 with two runs scored) and Ellsbury
(1 for 3 with two RBI) making some noise in the bottom of the order.
I believe the children are our
future.
Although you’ve got to wonder if
they look at a guy like Matt White, a prospect who was a good deal less
talented than them — remember this
nightmare? — and think about maybe getting into the stone quarrying
business instead. “Well
over $2 billion”? Ye gods.
One more thing: Chin
up, Looie.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
| Notes from an irrational Red Sox fan. Mike Miliard with news, views, analysis, and rants about happenings on-field and off. |
|
|
|
|
|
| July, 2008 (1) |
| June, 2008 (10) |
| May, 2008 (9) |
| April, 2008 (17) |
| March, 2008 (27) |
| February, 2008 (4) |
| January, 2008 (2) |
| December, 2007 (5) |
| November, 2007 (7) |
| October, 2007 (23) |
| September, 2007 (13) |
| August, 2007 (16) |
| July, 2007 (13) |
| June, 2007 (12) |
| May, 2007 (19) |
| April, 2007 (36) |
| March, 2007 (18) |
| February, 2007 (6) |
| January, 2007 (6) |
| December, 2006 (7) |
| November, 2006 (2) |
| October, 2006 (5) |
| September, 2006 (12) |
| August, 2006 (21) |
| July, 2006 (19) |
| June, 2006 (29) |
| May, 2006 (29) |
| April, 2006 (48) |
| March, 2006 (23) |
| February, 2006 (8) |
| January, 2006 (8) |
| December, 2005 (7) |
| November, 2005 (6) |
| October, 2005 (11) |
| September, 2005 (17) |
| August, 2005 (18) |
| July, 2005 (17) |
| June, 2005 (14) |
| May, 2005 (18) |
| April, 2005 (16) |
| March, 2005 (26) |
|
|
|
|