LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        
Talking Politics - Cowardly Anonymity Strikes Boston Politics!


Monday, November 05, 2007


Cowardly Anonymity Strikes Boston Politics!


Well, thank goodness we have a meaningless, manufactured controversy around which we can center tomorrow's city election. God forbid we should find ourselves talking about substance, issues, or experience.

Let's see if I can recap the events of the past several days.

John Connolly wishes to become an at-large city councilor, which right off the bat brings his judgment and mental acuity into question. Connolly had a chunk of money set aside for TV and radio ads, but rightly concluded that he'd be better off sending loads of mailers and fliers to the roughly 126 or so Bostonians who might actually vote. One of these mailers attacked an incumbent, a perfectly natural political act; specifically, it suggested that Stephen Murphy often seems more interested in finding his next job than doing the one he has.

The only sin there is lack of originality. But for some unknown and idiotic reason, the Connolly campaign chose not to identify itself on the mailer as the source of the piece. Then they played cute about it before fessing up to the authorship. This bizarre brain spasm on Connolly's part was an early Christmas gift to Murphy, who quickly leapt to the moral high ground and trumpeted a righteous plaint of Connolly's cowardly anonymity. Others in and around city politics are also expressing their shock and dismay over this dastardly scheme -- because Lord knows nobody in Boston politics has ever anonymously criticized another pol. As a journalist, I can personally attest that all of our local officeholders and their staffs insist on being named and fully identified whenever speaking ill of their colleagues; you should hear the umbrage when I suggest hiding their identities behind vague sourcing! No, never such cowardice for me!, they cry.

Then came a separate piece, from something called the "Parkway Coalition," which urged West Roxburians to bullet-vote Connolly. This refers to the strategy of using just one of the voter's four available selections, a shady and dishonorable practice that even the most inexperienced Boston operative knows you're supposed to encourage privately while denouncing publicly. The "Parkway Coalition" appears to be a front for the John Connolly campaign, seeing as they use the same permit number for political postage rate, so on this one Connolly seems to have combined two sins of stupidity: stating publicly something that he's supposed to only say privately; and hiding his culpability really really badly.

As with the attack on Murphy, I don't quite understand why Connolly and/or his people didn't want to be up front about the whole thing -- especially since the Boston Globe has, in effect, endorsed a Connolly bullet vote. So why not just say that?




Monday, November 05, 2007 9:46:56 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I think it's odd that people are shocked that Murphy would seek higher office. I mean, maybe I'm missing something but don't they all want to achieve something better than the Boston City Council? Well, all of them except Yancey. Seriously though, the race should be about the issues. From where I sit Murphy has done a fine job on the issues important to me. Connolly, of course, has no record to stand on and thus has to resort to attacking someone else and does a poor job of that (since he was hoping to be anonymous). That said, I won't be supporting John Connolly tomorrow but I will be voting for Murphy.
Aimee
Comments are closed.
INFO

RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Send mail to the author(s)
Adam Reilly's news and notes from Massachusetts' always interesting political scene.

LINKS

RECENT
ADVERTISEMENT

ARCHIVE



CATEGORIES

EXCLUSIVE

TOOLS
Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe with Bloglines

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Hype Machine

MP3 Blogs

del.icio.us/OnTheDownload

Add to Google








TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group