LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO
        
Talking Politics - Red-hot religious-disclosure action!


Thursday, January 26, 2006


Red-hot religious-disclosure action!


There's been plenty of coverage already. But a couple of important points connected to yesterday's House smackdown of the religious-disclosure bill seem to have been missed.

First, according to State House News Service's House session notes, Speaker Sal DiMasi was out sick for the debate and the vote. Since I've been feeling like crap myself, I shouldn't be skeptical. Still, doesn't it seem odd that DiMasi--who predicted the bill's passage back in November--didn't show up for one of the highest-profile votes his chamber will take this year?

Second, if this bill became law, religious organizations of all sizes would have had to disclose the salaries of their five highest-paid employees. This, in turn, could have created some awkward moments, with congregants discovering just how profitable the salvation business can be--not in all cases, but in some.

Back to DiMasi. It would be very, very interesting to know whether the speaker's mind changed--and what conversations he had with his members--over the last three months.

I still don't know what I think about this bill, to be honest. I like the idea of churches and other religious entities following the same protocol as other nonprofits, but I'd also like to keep church and state as far apart as possible. In any event, whether you think religious disclosure is a good idea or a bad one, yesterday's outcome raises some big questions--about the way the House works under DiMasi, and also about the privileges churches should and shouldn't be granted in a secular society.





1/26/2006 5:20:06 PM by Adam Reilly | Comments [2] |  



Thursday, January 26, 2006 5:59:36 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I am all for separation of church and state. That said, however, if Massachusetts is going to allow, indeed encourage, certain religious entities to act as state-funded social service providers, those entities should be treated like any other nonprofit. Open the books.
Anonymous
Friday, January 27, 2006 10:18:54 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
How about the spanking O'Flaherty gave marion walsh. especially after her not so nice public comments about him when when he went to portugal.
statehouse page
Comments are closed.
INFO

RSS 2.0
Atom 1.0
Send mail to the author(s)
Adam Reilly's news and notes from Massachusetts' always interesting political scene.

LINKS

RECENT
ADVERTISEMENT

ARCHIVE



CATEGORIES

EXCLUSIVE

TOOLS
Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe with Bloglines

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Hype Machine

MP3 Blogs

del.icio.us/OnTheDownload

Add to Google








TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group