Monday, May 12, 2008

Candidate Clinton: The Girl Can't Help it

By,
Wendy Kaminer

        Hillary Clinton has a new excuse for continuing a campaign that is most likely doomed and clearly destructive: genetic determinism: “ I’ve come to believe that hard work, determination and resiliency are encoded in our DNA,” she declared, speaking to a group of female supporters in West Virginia, the New York Times reports. “We know that we have the ‘worry’ gene. We know we have the ‘put your coat on because it’s cold outside’ gene. But we also have the ‘stand up and fight for what you believe in’ gene.’ ”

        It’s hardly surprising to hear Clinton appealing to female chauvinism, given the demographics of the race. (According to the Times, her remarks “brought thunderous applause.”) And if she is a feminist, she would not be the first caught joining the majority of people who believe that biology is destiny, instead of fighting them. The feminist movement has always been divided over theories or biases about natural cognitive and characterological sexual differences. But it is discouraging to hear an intelligent woman like Hillary Clinton frame a tribute to femininity quite so stupidly. Maybe her anti-intellectualism is genuine, after all, but I doubt she really believes that women have a “worry” or “fight” gene, anymore than men have a “science” gene, (and any feminists who applaud Clinton’s remarks should refrain from criticizing the speculations about men’s superior scientific abilities that got former Harvard President Larry Summers into so much trouble.) Clinton has often characterized criticisms of her conduct as sexist, but a woman who exploits stereotypes of femininity shouldn’t complain about being disadvantaged by them.

feminism | politics | sex discrimination

5/12/2008 1:48:18 PM by Wendy Kaminer | Comments [2] |
Related posts:
This Just In: The Right to Travel ... to Israel?
A conservative academic for Colorado: A specimen Margaret Mead would love?
This Just In: Mukasey not honorable enough for BC Law
A Guide to Hiring Women, Then and Now
Separating the Girls from the Boys
At last -- a president who believes in liberty?

Monday, May 12, 2008 2:37:24 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)

Just like everything else this primary season, Clinton wants to have it both ways.

Sarah J

Monday, May 12, 2008 2:47:16 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)

I find both candidates want to have it both ways.... The more general rule is that all candidates want to have it all ways.

I find Clinton's remarks here typical of much of "you go girl" feminism which often finds a way to rationalize all sorts of irrational, unscientific beliefs, myths, prejudices, biases.

As part of a speech I don't mind it so much. I think it's on a par with Obama's faking a "black style of speaking" as he does in many of his speeches. (It's been noted by journalists that "grew up" with Obama in Chicago that alone he has a very plain linguistic style, much as you might expect from someone who grew up in Hawaii.)

If she changes that into policy, that's a different matter, but again, I find that many current feminist policies shoved into legislation already legislate unscientific, irrational, unfair, sexist putatively feminist policies.

jerry

Name
E-mail
Home page

	Remember Me
Comment (Some html is allowed: `a@href@title, strike`) where the @ means "attribute." For example, you can use <a href="" title=""> or <blockquote cite="Scott">.
Enter the code shown (prevents robots):
Live Comment Preview