The Sound of Poetry, by Robert Pinsky
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 128 pages, $16
In the wake of his translation of Dante's Inferno and his appointment as
the nation's poet laureate, Robert Pinsky has become American poetry's
ambassador, as well as its lord mayor. He has made himself a visible, audible,
and effective advocate for poetry as few American poets before him have done,
and he may well succeed in rescuing the craft of verse from the shoe-shuffling
embarrassment in which it has languished here since about the time of the death
of Longfellow. Poets have spoken much to themselves, to each other, and to
their faithful readers, but rather little to the busy outer world, except in
despair over that world's unthinkable neglect of them. Pinsky apparently has
not heard, as Germaine Greer says, that there are now more people writing
poetry than reading it; in his optimism, he has set out, among other things, to
create an archive of America's favorite poems as selected and read by average
citizens. He believes that America is, despite evidence to the contrary, a
poetry-loving nation -- and so it may be, before he is done.
The Sound of Poetry, a kind of beginner's guide to the appreciation of
verse, is a part of Pinsky's ambassadorial enterprise. It is not, and does not
pretend to be, an exhaustive guide to the creation of formal verse, nor is it a
history of meter, form, or style in English-language poetry. Rather, it is a
painless journey through the foothills of poetry, considered through the topics
of accent, line, musical values, and form. Largely free of technical terms
(unless thunketta is a technical term -- it's something like a dactyl),
it is likely to be quite welcoming to the reader just starting to be curious
about how poetry functions and is written. This is the very sort of book to
which one might turn after hearing, say, President Clinton reading his favorite
poem on the radio.
One of the marvelous things about this book is Pinsky's deep recognition that
a poem is successful not because of the poet's ambition or sense of purpose but
because of the effect it creates in the reader, and in many readers over time:
"I presume that the technology of poetry, using the human body as its medium,
evolved for specific uses: to hold things in memory, both within and beyond the
individual life span . . . to share feelings and ideas with companions, and
also with the dead and with those who come after us." He has blown off the dust
of guild secrecy that typifies many poetic manuals: his is an open book.
This is far from the sort of manifesto that characterized poets' prose for
much of this century. Pinsky's measured paragraphs do not denounce or discard
past or present; his aesthetics unhesitatingly take in not only Thomas Campion,
Ben Jonson, and Thomas Hardy but also James McMichael, Louise Glück, Frank
Bidart, James Wright, and Robert Frost. The peaceful reconciliation of these
varied voices within one book is perhaps further proof that we are, as Geoffrey
O'Brien has suggested, living in an Alexandrian age of collection and
appreciation. There is room for both Allen Ginsberg and Fulke Greville on your
bookshelf, just as there is room for Jean Baptiste Lully and They Might Be
Giants in your CD changer. And, good diplomat that he is, Pinsky recognizes and
cherishes the latent poetry of daily sound: "Every speaker, intuitively and
accurately, courses gracefully through immensely subtle manipulations of sound
. . . it is almost as if we sing to one another all day." This, perhaps, is the
poem of America that Pinsky has been seeking, and that he re-creates in his own
advocacy and writings.
|