LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  THE BEST |  CLASSIFIED

Air apparent

WBUR has done a 180 under Paul La Camera, thanks, in part to some serious-news hires
July 19, 2007 12:36:16 PM

0707020_dqm_main

With any institution in flux, it’s easier to pinpoint when things fell apart than when they were put back together. But this seems like a fair time to conclude that WBUR (90.FM), the Boston University–based public-radio giant, has transcended the dysfunction that dogged it not too long ago.

Consider three recent hires by the station. Wen Stephenson, the editor of the Boston Globe’s Ideas section, is poised to become senior producer of On Point, WBUR’s nationally syndicated newsmagazine. Jon Marcus, the former editor of Boston magazine and an Associated Press alum, signed on as the station’s managing editor this past month; he took the job on a trial basis, but seems inclined to stick around. And David Boeri, a well-known reporter for WCVB-TV, left that station for WBUR earlier this year; his new local newsmagazine, Radio Boston, debuts in September.

Each move comes with an asterisk. Ideas and On Point share a broad intellectual sensibility; Marcus needed a gig after splitting with Boston in 2006; and Boeri has experience in public broadcasting (as a reporter for WGBH-TV’s now-defunct Ten O’Clock News) and knew Paul La Camera, WBUR’s general manager, when La Camera ran WCVB.

Collectively, though, these moves suggest two bigger trends. At a time when local commercial-radio outlets are cutting news and re-emphasizing conservative talk, WBUR is, instead, bolstering its brand by sharpening its already potent general-news operation. And the station’s future looks bright enough that local-news veterans want to be a part of it.

Wake up, smell the roses
Contrast this with the turbulent period that preceded La Camera’s arrival in October 2005. For most of her tenure, Jane Christo, WBUR’s general manager from 1979 to 2004, was known as a talented broadcasting visionary; Car Talk and The Connection (both of which gained loyal national followings) had their genesis under her watch, and the station’s audience grew dramatically. But in her final years there, WBUR seemed close to imploding.

In 2001, for example, Christo engaged in a public battle with Chris Lydon and Mary McGrath, host and producer, respectively, of The Connection, over the future of the show and the money it generated; Lydon and McGrath subsequently left the station. Then, in September 2004, WBUR announced it would sell its Rhode Island stations, WRNI and WXNI, angering individuals who’d given them money and prompting an investigation by the Rhode Island attorney general.

The Globe subsequently reported that WBUR had incurred a series of multi-million dollar deficits, and Christo was hit with multiple allegations of mismanagement. (An internal investigation reportedly found that some of these allegations had merit and others did not; in the end, WBUR didn’t sell its Rhode Island affiliates.) After Christo resigned, in 2004, interim GM Peter Fielder arrived with a mandate to whip the station into shape; to the dismay of many, this led to the August 2005 axing of The Connection and host Dick Gordon, who’d won a high-profile battle to succeed Lydon the previous year.

Times have changed. In a recent conversation with the Phoenix, La Camera rattles off a slew of good WBUR news: the station’s staff is up from 125 people two years ago to 135 today, including four new reporting slots; the documentary unit is making documentaries again; the $10.25 million underwriting total for the past fiscal year was second only to New York’s WNYC; the entire operation is running in the black. As he recounts these facts, La Camera has the Cheshire Cat air of a man who’s watching everything go right. “So far,” he concludes, “so good.”

Amid this newfound tranquility, the journalistic possibilities presented by public radio’s long-form brand of news look especially attractive — even (or especially) to journalists used to working in other formats. Marcus contrasts the current anxieties of print journalism (diminishing news holes, declining ad revenues, ebbing circulation, and job cuts) with what he sees in public radio in general and at WBUR in particular (passionate, enthusiastic employees, the like of which he hasn’t seen in print lately). “I don’t mean to cast aspersions on the print world,” Marcus says, “but there’s a lot of stress and cynicism there.”

Stephenson insists his jump to WBUR wasn’t linked to dissatisfaction with Ideas or the Globe; instead, he says, he’s just a huge fan of On Point. But Boeri, too, casts WBUR as a sort of oasis in the journalistic wilderness. “Newspapers have shallowed out, and TV news has bottomed out,” he says.” There’s very little real reporting anymore. [WBUR] offered me an opportunity to do in-depth reporting and pursue important stories.”

It’s also worth noting that the Boeri and Marcus hires fit La Camera’s stated goal of increasing the station’s focus on local news. Bruce Gellerman, a WBUR alum who hosted Here and Now, WBUR’s midday newsmagazine, before being dropped in 2002, says La Camera is succeeding. The station “sounds like it’s gone through a renaissance,” Gellerman says. “It’s really changed back to the mission of what ’BUR was, which was building a strong local-news organization, and that, I think, is to La Camera’s credit.”

But Gellerman also injects a note of caution regarding the future. “Right now, you’ve got National Public Radio doing Sirius [satellite radio], doing podcasting,” he says. “It won’t be too long before NPR won’t need local stations to distribute its national products. The question then is, what happens to local stations? Are listeners going to want to keep not only listening to local content, but paying for local content?”

It’s a good question, and time will tell how La Camera and WBUR meet this challenge. Given where the station was three years ago, however, it seems almost unfair to focus on problems that haven’t quite materialized. WBUR was a mess; now it’s not. For the time being, that may be enough.

COMMENTS

The On Point conversations appear to be derived for the most part from press releases associated with the guest or guests. There appears to be very little original thinking by the broadcaster hosting On Point. The screening of callers is not transparent. Radio broadcasters should reveal the equipment, the software and the producers' practices used in screening callers. It also appears priority is given to regular callers and friends of the show personnel. Many of the callers would do better than the broadcaster working mostly from the press releases.

POSTED BY dsaklad@zurich.csail.mit.edu AT 07/19/07 10:07 PM
Do we really need to see all the inner-workings of a radio show to appreciate its content? More than anything else, I think that Tom Ashbrook maintains an unbiased host-role and gives voice to a diverse range of opinions. True, the show focuses mainly on major stories that you can read about in many of the larger papers, and in that way it can sometimes feel redundant. But then so does the New York Times' Week in Review. As a WBUR listener, On Point sounds like The Diane Rehm show, but with more voices, and it comes on twice a day. And I really like the Friday show that touches on all the major stories of the past week. Maybe that's just because I like Fridays.

POSTED BY i4NDY AT 07/20/07 12:51 AM
The one constant hand over there has been John Davidow. More than LaCamera, Davidow seems the one responsible for righting the ship. He also brought in these three new guys, although, obviously, the chief LaCamera gets the credit because, well, he's the chief!

POSTED BY Hoss AT 07/23/07 4:42 PM
You gotta be kidding me.

POSTED BY Neil Attkins AT 08/01/07 9:39 AM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

MOST POPULAR

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group