LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

Apolitical justice

Lefts and rights
August 15, 2007 4:21:01 PM

070817_rhea_main

When they began their careers in the gloaming of the 1960s, few would have predicted that conservative-leaning TV broadcaster Dan Rea and decidedly liberal US District Court Judge Nancy Gertner would make history together.

But that’s what happened three weeks ago, when Joseph Salvati, Peter Limone, and the estates of Henry Tameleo and Louis Greco were awarded $102 million after Salvati and Limone spent nearly 30 years in jail and Tameleo and Greco died behind bars, all framed by the FBI for a 1965 gangland murder.

The award is the largest ever in a wrongful-conviction case. And it comes largely thanks to the work of two figures with very different political leanings but a similar thirst for justice.

Gertner, who wrote the 228-page decision awarding the payout, is a long-time liberal lioness. She attended Yale Law with the Clintons. (Bill nominated her to her seat in 1993.) Her first big case as a criminal defense lawyer was defending student radical Susan Saxe against manslaughter and armed-robbery charges in 1975. In the years since, she’s helped safeguard abortion rights in Massachusetts and has worked tirelessly on cases dealing with prisoners’ rights, minorities, and the poor.

About the time Gertner was defending Saxe, Rea was national vice-chairman of the anti-radical, William F. Buckley–founded Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) at BU Law. Now a general-assignment reporter for WBZ-TV, Rea’s been hammering the Salvati case via some five dozen television reports since 1993. “I don’t want to be portrayed as a crazy right-wing guy, because I’m definitely not,” he says. “But you wouldn’t describe Dan Rea as a bleeding-heart, knee-jerk liberal.”

Gertner and Rea, both at the tops of their professions for more than three decades, have lately found themselves forming something of a mutual-admiration society.

Gertner (who did not respond to a request for comment) cited Rea’s reporting in her decision. Noting that “proof of innocence in this democracy should not depend upon efforts as gargantuan as these,” she lauded him for “relentlessly” pursuing “the cause of Salvati’s innocence.”

Rea, meanwhile, returns the compliment. “Nancy Gertner is a great judge. The only word I can [use to] describe [her] would be ‘magnificent.’ She came out, made her findings of fact in a very complicated case — this was not an easy case to understand — and just nailed the government, nailed the Justice Department.”

No surprise, says attorney (and Phoenix contributor) Harvey Silverglate, who was Gertner’s law partner for 16 years. As one of the rare judges on the federal bench with a criminal-defense and civil-liberties background, Silverglate says, “she’s cross-examined enough FBI agents that she can tell when an FBI agent is lying, quite instinctively. The FBI was not lucky having her on the case, because her experience makes her a very sophisticated consumer of FBI testimony.”

And it shouldn’t be too surprising that someone like Gertner and someone like Rea can find common cause. Especially these days. Liberals, after all, no longer have a monopoly on skepticism of governmental power.

“Friends of mine didn’t understand why I was involved in this guy’s case,” says Rea, who spent 15 years, often on his own time, investigating Salvati’s imprisonment. “I had no sense of proprietary interest in it. I wanted to see justice done.”

COMMENTS

TV broadcaster Dan Rea and US District Court Judge Nancy Gertner deserve the highest kudos for their professional ethics and zealous pursuit of justice in this case. It is a rare example of justice in an all too often corrupt legal system. Having been falsely arrested once and falsely imprisoned twice in Massachusetts while those responsible for investigating criminal complaints used their offices to cover up the crime instead of investigate the crime is a more common rule. Accountability for professional malfeasance and nonfeasance in Massachusetts is so rare it never dissuades. Lack of accountability creates a miasma of corruption inherently inimical to the pursuit of justice in Massachusetts.

POSTED BY Krogy AT 08/18/07 10:38 AM
TV broadcaster Dan Rea and US District Court Judge Nancy Gertner deserve the highest kudos for their professional ethics and zealous pursuit of justice in this case. It is a rare example of justice in an all too often corrupt legal system. Having been falsely arrested once and falsely imprisoned twice in Massachusetts while those responsible for investigating criminal complaints used their offices to cover up the crime instead of investigate the crime is a more common rule. Accountability for professional malfeasance and nonfeasance in Massachusetts is so rare it never dissuades. Lack of accountability creates a miasma of corruption inherently inimical to the pursuit of justice in Massachusetts.

POSTED BY Krogy AT 08/18/07 10:38 AM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password


MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group