LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

Wrapped up

If a third candidate crowds the 2008 presidential election, the GOP will have effectively handed the election to Hillary
October 17, 2007 4:06:10 PM

071019_clinton_main

The upcoming presidential election was never going to be an easy one for the Republicans to win. As “time for change” fever takes over, it’s difficult to succeed a popular incumbent, much less one as reviled as President Bush.

Still, not that long ago, things looked hopeful for the GOP. The Democrats are likely to choose Hillary Clinton, a candidate with some of the highest negative ratings of any non-incumbent nominee in modern presidential politics. What’s more, there’s a decent chance the Republicans will nominate someone from outside the Sun Belt, who would have unusual appeal in the Democratic base. That’s why the margin is much closer when Rudy Giuliani runs head-to-head with Clinton than it is in polls that pit an unnamed Democrat against an unnamed Republican.

But events are conspiring to eviscerate any chance the Republicans have of winning next year. Simply put, the party is fissuring, so if three or four — not two — major candidates end up on the fall ballot, the Democrats will win in a walk.

Every 12 years or so, a new independent or third-party candidate gains momentum during an election cycle. Almost always, when these candidacies arise, it’s the incumbent party that loses the election. In 2000 with Ralph Nader, in 1992 with H. Ross Perot, in 1980 with John Anderson, in 1968 with George Wallace, and on back through modern-American political history, the lesson of third parties is twofold: they never win and, because their ire is often directed at the status quo — thus the party holding power — they damage the candidate of the incumbent party.

It certainly won’t help matters for the GOP that this year’s splinter candidates will probably come from nominally Republican ranks. The media has focused on New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, but he’s actually the unlikeliest of the three to make a third-party bid. The likeliest is current GOP candidate Ron Paul, who already has one independent general-election run under his belt as a Libertarian (in 1988, when he garnered just 0.5 percent of the vote) and would have no trouble making another. As this year’s version of Perot, Paul’s already shown unexpected grassroots appeal and fundraising ability. And he’s so far refused to say he would support the party’s nominee, which is always a telling sign.

Then there’s the Religious Right, some of whose adherents have put the GOP on notice that, if Giuliani — the party’s strongest general-election candidate — receives the nomination, they, too, would consider going the independent route. (Some later backed off the threat, but it’s still there.)

As Perot discovered in 1992, when the major parties secure their nominees early, the political press has nothing to do for six months, so it devotes its energy to building up independent candidacies. That will happen again next year. And, if Paul, Bloomberg, or a far-right candidate makes a run, that candidate would only have to pick up a percentage point or two in such key swing states as Pennsylvania and Ohio to make a Giuliani victory improbable. (Never mind a victory for Fred Thompson — as a presidential candidate, Thompson would be the second coming of Bob Dole, a nominee who holds the base but nothing more.) Equally important, these challenges would make it much harder for Republicans to focus on the deficiencies of the Democratic candidate.

It’s true that there have been races in which incumbent parties have, despite a challenge by a third party, retained the White House. But in 1924 and 1948 — the most notable modern examples — an incumbent was running for re-election and was able to make a persuasive case for keeping himself on the job. Thus Harry Truman was able to narrowly reverse the tide and beat Thomas Dewey, Henry Wallace, and Strom Thurmond — a feat of personal campaigning that almost defies political gravity. And in 1924, the Republicans were never in jeopardy, so Calvin Coolidge won handily.

The chances of that happening this go-around are remote. Instead, the election may be a repeat of 1992. Though Democrats like to forget it, Bill Clinton was an enormously damaged candidate that year because of the personal scandals surrounding his candidacy. It’s debatable whether he could have won a two-way general election. But 43 percent in a three-person field? That was child’s play, as a three-way race would be for Hillary next year.

Republicans are now hoping that fear of Mrs. Clinton is so great, it will eventually force any voter who opposes her to rally around their nominee. They’d better hope so. If not, we could see three or even four candidates in the general-election mix next fall. That would result in a slam-dunk campaign that even the Democrats couldn’t lose.

THE FIELD
REPUBLICANS
RUDY GIULIANI

Odds: 3-2 | past week: same
MITT ROMNEY
Odds: 3-1 | same
FRED THOMPSON
Odds: 3-1 | same
JOHN MCCAIN
Odds: 8-1 | same
MIKE HUCKABEE
Odds: 100-1 | same
SAM BROWNBACK
Odds: 1000-1 | same
RON PAUL
Odds: 25,000-1 | same
DUNCAN HUNTER
Odds: 200,000-1 | same
TOM TANCREDO
Odds: 250,000-1 | same
ALAN KEYES
Odds: 3 million-1 | same

DEMOCRATS
HILLARY CLINTON
Odds: even | past week: same
BARACK OBAMA
Odds: 3-2 | same
JOHN EDWARDS
Odds: 10-1 | same
BILL RICHARDSON
Odds: 100-1 | same
JOE BIDEN
Odds: 200-1 | same
CHRIS DODD
Odds: 250-1 | same
DENNIS KUCINICH
Odds: 100,000-1 | same
MIKE GRAVEL
Odds: 16 million-1 | same

On the Web
The Presidential Tote Board blog: //www.thephoenix.com/toteboard

COMMENTS

You have got to be joking. Ron Paul is gonna sweep this election. The people of the USA want the war to end and the constitution to be reinstated. This article is no more than propaganda. Ron Paul will do what Pelosi was sent to do.

POSTED BY badunit AT 10/18/07 11:56 AM
I'd like to see where you get these odds. The gambling sites such as Sportsbook have his odds at 6-1. Brownback dropped out today, who is next? I feel very hopeful about Dr. Paul's chances, so much that I am donating another $100 next month.

POSTED BY KitMaira AT 10/18/07 4:43 PM
The always worth reading Jay Cost at Realclear Politics has posted a comment on this piece at //www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/2007/10/more_on_third_parties.html

POSTED BY Steven Stark AT 10/19/07 9:51 AM
October 21st, 2007 at 3:37 pm //www.naplesnews.com/news/2007/oct/20/poll_half_say_they_would_never_vote_hillary_presid/?breaking_news Poll: Half say they would never vote for Hillary for president. That sounds like even odds to me.

POSTED BY Krogy AT 10/22/07 12:58 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

The Best 2008 Readers Poll

MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR
  • RIDGE TO THE FUTURE:   The guessing game about his running mate has begun, but if Obama’s the opponent, one man can secure the white house for McCain
  • GIANT STEP:   If Hillary Clinton can take Pennsylvania, the Democrats will be shooting themselves in the foot
  • ONE FOR THE BOOKS:   Can tales of the Democratic party’s glory days help Obama and Clinton?
  • CIVIL WAR:   If Clinton can pull off a couple more victories, the democratic party is headed for a disastrous, fight-worn finish
  • LOSING IT?:   Hillary Clinton has squandered a huge lead. Can she get it back?
  • THE MORNING AFTER:   Now that Super Tuesday is behind them, where do they go from here?
  • SUPER PREVIEW:   Clinton and McCain shouldn’t write their acceptance speeches just yet
  • WHO SAID FREDDY’S DEAD?:   If the Republican convention deadlocks, a modern-day Warren G. Harding could emerge as a surprise neutral nominee
  • NET RESULTS:   Rather than improving political discourse, Internet pundits are making things worse
  • GOING THE DISTANCE:   With two major contests over and done, the nomination process is coming into clearer focus. Who’ll be the last person standing?

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group