LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

Gov: Cut services while I travel overseas

While Baldacci takes lobbyists’ money for a trip, his wife bills taxpayers
October 24, 2007 2:16:30 PM
inside_feat_junket_GovBoat

Lobbyists and campaign contributors are among the private interests paying for Governor John Baldacci’s upcoming trip to Asia, though the state forbids officials from accepting gifts. At the same time, taxpayers are paying for Baldacci’s wife to accompany him, though she is not a state employee. Taxpayers are also paying for nine other state employees to go, though the governor has frozen state-employee travel to the “absolute minimum necessary to maintain effective operations” of government.

And since the Baldacci Administration is reluctant to fully explain these arrangements, it is no surprise that the Washington DC-based Center for Public Integrity gives Maine an “F” on governors’ financial-disclosure laws, ranking it 43rd of the 50 states.

At a time when Baldacci has cut or is demanding cuts in services to the mentally ill, poor people on Medicaid, needy children, the unemployed, and others, and when Baldacci and legislative leaders agree taxes are too high, state officials nevertheless see expensive trips abroad as business-as-usual.

Not that there isn’t high-level criticism. Baldacci recently attacked five Maine Turnpike Authority officials for taking a $26,000 trip to Austria for a trade-group meeting. But from October 27 to November 3 Baldacci himself is leading 29 officials and business people to Japan and South Korea, hoping to attract interest in Maine products. This “trade mission,” Baldacci’s fourth, will cost $175,000, a good chunk of it paid by taxpayers, according to the Maine International Trade Center, the quasi-state agency organizing it (at deadline, the center had not clarified the exact taxpayers’ tab).

In a society that rarely questions government’s role in aiding private enterprise, such trade missions are seldom scrutinized. But the trip has elements that raise questions among a few legislators and a good-government group:

The rules
No one contacted for this article suggests Baldacci is breaking the law. But there is a law and other rules on gifts that officials must heed:

“IMPROPER GIFTS TO PUBLIC SERVANTS” CRIMINAL LAW Violated if an official has “economic gain” from a gift given to influence the official’s actions.

STATE CODE OF ETHICS “No elected or appointed public official or employee should borrow or accept personal gifts from any person or entity which buys services from, or sells to, or is regulated by, his or her governmental agency.”

ON FAMILY TRAVEL The Code of Ethics also says, “Any use of public funds to benefit self, family, or friends will not be tolerated.”

ANNUAL WARNING Every year before Christmas, Administrative and Financial Services head Rebecca Wyke warns state workers: “It is against state policy for an employee to accept gifts from any person or business that conducts business, or expects to conduct business, with the State of Maine.”
_LT

LOBBYISTS FOOT THE BILL: The 10 private concerns covering Democrat Baldacci’s expenses are all represented on the trip and include the Maine Pulp & Paper Association, a trade organization, and the law firm Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios; these two are major State House lobbyists and include heavy-hitter Baldacci campaign contributors. Participation costs up to $6000, depending on translators and other services. Twenty-two individuals have been charged $332 each for the governor and for one bodyguard, for a total of $7304, the trade center says.

THE GOV’S WIFE, TOO: Although Maine’s news media call the governor’s wife the state’s “First Lady,” she has no state-employee status or legislative appropriation. The state only began paying for Karen Baldacci’s travels last year, and officials will not say why, though her expenses on this trip are being covered because “she is serving in an official capacity on behalf of the people of Maine,” says the governor’s office.

Her compensation comes from that office’s travel budget, says Finance and Administration commissioner Rebecca Wyke, who approves it along with Baldacci’s chief of staff. In 21 months, Karen Baldacci traveled out of state seven times at taxpayer expense, usually with her husband, but went alone to a governors’ “Spouses Seminar” in Oklahoma City in April. Her travel so far has cost taxpayers $4188.

TRAVEL RESTRICTED: To curb spending, Baldacci in July banned all but essential travel by officials. Yet accompanying the Baldaccis are John Richardson, the state Economic and Community Development commissioner; tourism and agriculture bureaucrats; a representative of the Maine Port Authority; two state police bodyguards (one whose expenses will be covered by taxpayers); and three people from the international trade center.

The criticism
The trip’s coziness bothers some.

“If it’s supposed to benefit the people of Maine, it should be done with no strings attached to lobbyists,” says Jon Bartholomew, acting state director of Common Cause, the government-watchdog group. “There should be no exchange of anything of value. [Baldacci’s] costs should be paid by the state . . . so as to prevent any kind of undue influence on our government officials.”

Bartholomew adds, “The cost of the governor’s wife is very questionable. What’s her role?”

Jon Courtney, the York County Republican senator on the legislative Business Committee, asks the same question. “These trade missions do have some value,” he says, “but I don’t understand why Karen Baldacci is going.”


pages: 1 | 2
COMMENTS

It is diffficult to see how the Governor's basic lack of enthusiasm for the public interest could improve the image of the State of Maine -- overseas. Send the Gov. to a place for safe-keeping like his supermax in Warren, and let his perfectly competent wife karen be our traveling ambasador for a change.

POSTED BY Julian C. Holmes AT 10/24/07 5:20 PM
Lobbyist money is a story on its own whenever there's ties to cult power in Maine. Is this the case here about Baldacci's trip to Asia? Additionally, cultural differences in Asia may require the husband/wifey presence of Gov. and Mrs. Baldacci -- but still doesn't excuse weird political economics about wifey's presence there.

POSTED BY N. Page AT 10/25/07 12:44 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

The Best 2008 Readers Poll

MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group