The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
Big Fat Whale  |  Failure  |  Hoopleville  |  Lifestyle Features
Best2012Vote-1000x50

Fair game?

Building the best team money can buy
By CHRIS YOUNG  |  May 18, 2006

A-Rod
PAY-ROD: In Rodriguez, the Yankees field the sport's highest-paid player

This is the type of story that gets Yankee fans’ blood boiling. They thoroughly resent it any time someone brings up the accusation that their favorite team is annually trying to “buy” a world championship. Since 1998, the Yankees have indeed had the highest payroll of any team in Major League Baseball, and they’ve managed to win four world championships during that time. One could, then, postulate that the best-paid team ultimately became the best team on the field in 1996, 1998, 1999, and 2000.

What about all those other years? We’ll get to that.

In the meantime, let’s get down to those Pinstriper fans’ concerns. Their primary point is paramount: there is no salary cap in baseball, so there is no breaking of the rules going on. The fact is that any of the 29 other MLB teams could do exactly the same thing — or spend more — than the Yankees annually do. The fact that those other teams don’t, or can’t, spend as much is the underlying reason why such animosity has been directed toward Boss George Steinbrenner’s free-spending ways.

The Yankees have indeed made their organization a very appealing place for a major-leaguer to want to ply his trade, although there is a bit of a chicken-and-egg question going on here: is New York a great place to play because it’s a great team and a comfortable environment, or has  Yankee Stadium become an appealing spot because all the best players go there — because the team can offer its players more money than practically anywhere else? If the latter is the case, then it’s no wonder why the franchise can offer such luxuries as All-Stars and potential Hall-of-Famers manning nearly every position.

Why don’t other teams spend as much as the Yankees? Some do, but even the second– (Boston, at $120.09 million), third– (the Angels, at $103.47 million), and fourth-place (the defending champion White Sox) teams in term of 2006 payrolls are still well over $70 million shy of the $194.66 million that the Yankees are paying their roster this season. After all, the differential between number-one and number-two on the list — nearly $75 million — is itself more than 16 teams are paying their entire teams this season.

Now we’ll be the first to admit that the Marlins, who were World Series champions just two-and-a-half years ago, should not have dismantled their roster this past off-season, whittling their payroll down to a paltry $15 million in the process. And the other Florida franchise, the Devil Rays, should not still be collecting huge revenue-sharing and luxury-tax bounties each year while fielding only a $35-million team. The  Rockies ($41m), Pirates ($46m), and Royals ($47m) also should be spending a lot more on talent than they are now if they want to legitimately remain viable Major League Baseball franchises. Not surprisingly, all four of those aforementioned teams are very familiar with the coziness of their respective divisions cellars in recent years. (Although it’s worth noting that the Indians, who nearly snared last year’s wild-card berth last year en route to a 93-win season, competed at a very high level despite a very modest $41-million payroll.)

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Boston music news: March 28, 2008, You could look it up, The Boston Red Sox, More more >
  Topics: Lifestyle Features , Baseball, Sports, Kansas City Royals,  More more >
| More

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 02/16 ]   Boston Conservatory Dance Division  @ Boston Conservatory Theater
[ 02/16 ]   Jim Gaffigan  @ Wilbur Theatre
[ 02/16 ]   "Raw Milk Debate"  @ Harvard Law School
MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed