The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Big Fat Whale  |  Failure  |  Hoopleville  |  Idiot Box  |  Lifestyle Features  |  Reality Check
Nominate-best-2010

White hunters, black hearts

Scambaiting turns the tables on Internet con men. But when the clever pranks turn dangerous and degrading, where does the moral compass point?
By MIKE MILIARD  |  September 12, 2007


SLIDESHOW: Images from Scambaiting Web sites

A man has sliced his palm open, for reasons that are unclear. Another reclines, naked and still, as his body is spattered with milk and egg yolks. One holds a sign declaring, I WAIT FOR YOU ON MY KNEES AT THE GLORY HOLE. Another’s placard proclaims him a GAY LAD. One has attached dozens of clothespins to his face and torso. One lays supine as a crude tattoo, huge and hideous, is cut into his back: “Pwn3d by Slaw.” One holds a piece of poster board scrawled with a question: ARE WE NOT HAVING FUN YET?

There are hundreds of faces in the “Trophy Room” of 419Eater.com, and most of them are black. They gaze into the camera with wry smiles, sometimes, but more often with affectless expressions, eyes staring wanly into middle distance.

The persons depicted in the photos are e-mail scammers, those Nigerian hucksters whose broken-English entreaties — promising millions in riches if only some dim dupe across the Atlantic will wire a few thousand in processing fees up front — flood your inbox each morning.

They’ve been procured by scambaiters, a cadre of swashbuckling online vigilantes who tangle with scammers by the hundreds, replying to their e-mails and, by promising them quick cash, turning the tables on the scammers themselves, goading the greedy into all kinds of absurd — and demeaning — behavior.

The practice seems a devilish bit of creative comeuppance. Those 419 e-mails (named after the Nigerian penal code for fraud), also called advance-fee frauds, managed to bilk Americans to the tune of $720 million in 2005. Worldwide, it’s estimated, they cost the gullible $3.2 billion each year.

What more noble pursuit than to beat these crooks at their own game? To humiliate them? To waste their time and their money, thereby diverting their attention, even temporarily, from their unsuspecting marks? (Many baiters forward all their correspondence with scammers to the authorities, in the hope of producing arrests.) If one can have a little fun in the process, even better.

After all, scammers, it seems, will do almost anything for money. By promising them that they’ll cash in if they perform an elaborate song-and-dance routine, or sit for a series of professional photographs with dead fish on their heads, or book a pricey hotel suite for a cash-handoff rendezvous that never occurs, one can forestall them, for however long, from plying their felonious trade.

But poking around various scambaiting Web sites, somewhat more sadistic dimensions to the practice come into view. While most scambaiters keep their pranks on the up and up, many others seem to revel in making their marks as miserable as possible.

Those photographs of abject humiliation are hard to swallow, even if one knows the mortification is self-imposed. The fact that their subjects are primarily poor and black only adds to their disquieting power.

Photographic memories
On the message board at UK-based scambait site 419Eater.com, more than 20,000 registered users gleefully compare notes in hundreds of threads about their ever-more creative baiting techniques, uploading photos and videos, as well as audio files of their phone conversations with scammers.

Some of the baits are funny. One scammer eagerly transcribed — longhand — an entire Harry Potter book, his pen spurred on by thirsty visions of a big payday. One was cajoled into carving a Commodore 64 replica from a block of wood.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |   next >
  Topics: Lifestyle Features , Entertainment, Internet, Baratunde Thurston,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
20 Comments / Add Comment

admin

so what? Who started this thingy? The scammers or the so-called baiters? Nobody is forcing the scammers to do whatever they do.
Posted: September 13 2007 at 4:48 AM

admin

so what? Who started this thingy? The scammers or the so-called baiters? Nobody is forcing the scammers to do whatever they do.
Posted: September 13 2007 at 4:50 AM

admin

The author worrying about the "racism" of the scambaiters is ludicrous. Would the same concern be shown if the scammers were poor, bible-thumping white Southerners that were being baited? Perhaps so, but I bet not. If most of the degradation was happening to Whites, not a problem. Unfortunately, as with the crime stats here, most of the criminals are black. The Phoenix doesn't have enough pages to go into why this is the case. Did the author have this much discomfort in the way Imus was treated? What about the Duke lacrosse team? It is the same type of thinking for the out of Iraq and into Darfur crowd.
Posted: September 13 2007 at 11:00 AM

admin

I first read about the advance fee scam back in the '80's in the pre internet days. Some church in Minnesota received a letter from someone in Nigeria that said they had $3M bequeathed to them in a will. Then a subsequent article explained that the church had to pay 10% tax to get the money. Ultimatley it was determined that this was an advance fee scam. More recently I read about some guy who was a PhD student at Tufts Medical School who ran his own scam on his friends to raise $60K to pay a 419 scammer in Nigeria to get the millions the Nigerian guy promised him!!! I have read that the 419 scammers in Nigeria are regarded as national heros!!! I feel that anyone who is stupid enough to fall for a 419 advance fee scam is too stupid to have a lot of money and deserves to lose it to some bozo in Nigeria.
Posted: September 13 2007 at 12:29 PM

admin

I wonder how they know the scammer is black before they send a photo.. I'm also wondering how they can "know" they are targeting a wealthy, upper class American, who must be no more than moderately inconvienced by the wholly voluntary transaction of money. The answer is, the baiter does not, and nor does the scammer. They'll take money from anyone, so why would the baiter be doing anything other than responding to a would-be fraudster? Sadly, there are many Nigerians who engage in these types of scams, and many of them are better off than the norm. Success and popularity do not make it any less of a crime.
Posted: September 13 2007 at 12:47 PM

admin

Stuff like the dead parrot sketch, that's a hilarious waste of time. When you're getting into guys sprayed with urine or tattooed, though, that doesn't so much suggest to me that the baiter is a racist, as they are a depraved person in general. (i.e. they would ask a white guy to abuse themselves in exactly the same fashion.) Enjoyment of nastiness like that is why I stopped visiting 419eater, no matter how funny I found some of the lighter-hearted pranks.
Posted: September 14 2007 at 12:47 PM

admin

Sorry, "slave branding"? No-one's being kidnapped from their home and forced into a life of slaverly. The scammers are choosing to contact the scambaiters, and acting entirely of their own free will, whatever their ethnic origin. If they decide that getting peed on, tattooing themselves or jumping off a roof is a sensible way to go about their lives, that's up to them. It's pretty much the old "if someone told you to jump off a bridge...?" scenario. The difference being, these guys say yes.
Posted: September 14 2007 at 6:45 PM

admin

What's really depraved is the little old lady that has been scammed out of her life savings by some lad, vlad or ninja. It's a pity you didnt read all the stickies in the forums to see the threads on the ethics of scamming, how not all scammers are from nigeria and why you shouldnt feel sorry for the scammers. How about how SICK it is to find something like this: http://ozbaiter.nightmail.ru/monica.htm Or even like this: http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1076607329509_72016529///?hub=WFive And how about those lonely hearts on dating sites that are preyed upon by the scum scammers? Methinks you need to spend just a little more time stepping outside of your ivory tower of backpatting and feel good psychology and enter the real world for a little while. Talk to some of the victims of scams for a bit and develop some empathy for the REAL victims of these crimes.
Posted: September 15 2007 at 7:03 AM

admin

Ah go easy on the guy a little. After all he's just a poor, misunderstood, under-educated hack who's only trying to scratch out a living to feed his addiction(s). You can't blame many journalists for what they do - it's in their culture to be that way! If it weren't for us here in the "fat white west" making conditions so hard for journalists for so long, they wouldn't be forced to play the race card so often to feed their families. The fact that the majority of scammers and / or baiters may or may not be white or black, and the fact that baiters may or may not be fat are totally irrelevant. Journalists do what they have to do in order to live a better life. In fact, a journalist who publishes enough believable nonsense may someday be awarded a job at a college newspaper if he gains enough respect within his community. If a journalist can get his work published in a syndicate, he knows he's made it to the top. If, however, he still lives with his mom at age 40 and can only have his work published on "alternative" news websites, he probably isn't being paid very much and may even have to get a real job some day. Instead of punishing these hogwash-artists, it's possible that we need to understand them and nurture their inner children and limite egos. We can't just have them euthanized, because that will just perpetuate the cycle. Keep in mind that most journalists live in a world where bullshit is respected and often rewarded. Before any real change can be affected, journalists will have to be shown that there really is more out there than just them and their fabricated misconceptions. A real journalist would have done just a little more research to determine that lives of victims were being lost. There is no mention that women were being conned into meeting these criminals and being raped and robbed. One victim was tortured and set on fire. Then, maybe then, we can all just get along.
Posted: September 15 2007 at 12:40 PM

admin

An interesting article, despite the use of the initially "obvious" (and, with the use of any kind of journalistic research, trivially disprovable) racism gambit. Yes, I'm part of the scambaiting community, such as it is. What we doi is nothing to do with humiliating people due to their skin colour, nor due to their education, but due to the fact that they are criminals, and particularly vicious ones at that. While it's true that a significant proportion of advance fee fraud comes from West Africa, it's far from the case that all the scammers are (for wont of a better word) "black". It's also far from the case that all West Africans are scammers; the scammers are a minority of the population, criminals attracted by an "easy" crime that exposes them to minimal risk for potentially large payoffs. Sure, it's entirely possible that some scambaiters are, in themselves, racist; take any sufficiently large community and you're liable to find racists. But that doesn't make the community in general, or the act of scambaiting itself, racist. All of the scambaiting sites I've visited are *extremely* careful to keep the racists out, to make sure that what's being done is being done for one reason only - to waste the time and money of criminals and keep them from spending that time and money defrauding their victims. Advance fee fraud, eBay scamming, internet romance scams and the like are not victimless crimes. These are nasty crimes that destroy lives, destroy familes, and that's without mentioning those that travel to meet their scammers, who have been raped, robbed, and in some cases, killed. These scammers, whatever their coulour, whatever their race, whatever their location, are bottom-feeding scum, the lowest of the low. Do some baits "cross the line" of decency? Maybe, maybe not. The general approach of scambaiters is to employ the scammers' own tactics against them, to appeal to their greed, to push them further and further until they have so much invested into the "scam" that they are "running" that they can't step out, that they simply can't bring themselves to believe they aren't going to get the big payoff. Does anyone or anything other than their own greed entice them to send naked photos of themselves with heavy objects tied to their genitals, to have tattoos carried out, or any other "demaning" acts? Of course not. A scambaiter will make a suggestion, which may in itself be something they would not consider carrying out themselves, but at all points the scammer is perfectly able to say "no". Frankly, at all points, the scammer is free to go off and get a proper job that doesn't involve ripping people off across the internet. The main (indeed, only) qualm I have with this is that the money wasted by the scammers is money they obtained from real victims, money that they will replace by scamming more victims. We, the scambaiting community, *may* succeed in driving some scammers into other occupations, in convincing them that the "big bucks" simply aren't going to happen from scamming, but the majority of scammers will simply shrug it off and carry on as normal. While there are people gullible enough to believe that there really is such a thing a free lunch, the scammers will continue doing their thing. And while there's still scammers doing their thing, we will be doing ours.
Posted: September 17 2007 at 8:18 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | next >
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

ARTICLES BY MIKE MILIARD
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   OBAMA'S YEAR TWO TO-DO'S  |  January 20, 2010
    This week marks the one-year anniversary of Barack Obama's inauguration. Can you believe it?
  •   HARVARD'S BREATHABLE CHOCOLATE  |  January 22, 2010
    Not long ago, Harvard engineer David Edwards was dining in Bordeaux with famed French molecular gastronomist Thierry Marx and colloidal chemist Jérôme Bibette. Suddenly, tucking into a plate of gourmet fare, Edwards — who specializes in aerosols — had what might be called a voilà! moment.
  •   FLYNN-TERROGATION  |  January 13, 2010
    In his powerful new memoir, The Ticking Is the Bomb (W.W. Norton), Scituate native Nick Flynn recounts a conversation he had with a man in Turkey.
  •   DROPPING THE BALL  |  January 06, 2010
    At last, the golden moment has arrived.
  •   REMEMBERING JOEY RAMONE  |  January 08, 2010
    On top of everything else that was a drag about the decade just past, there was this: in a three-and-a-half-year span, we lost three quarters of the Ramones. And then CBGB closed.

 See all articles by: MIKE MILIARD

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group