The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
Best2012Vote-1000x50

Taking stock of an imperiled free press

News you can lose
By ADAM REILLY  |  February 7, 2007

070209_miller_main
Judith Miller
Frontline’s new PBS series on the shifting balance-of-power between the government and the media — New War: Secrets, Spin and the Future of the News — isn’t uplifting. Far from it. But it’s essential viewing for anyone interested in the future of a free US press.

The first installment, which will air locally on WGBH-TV (Channel 2) at 9 pm, on February 13, focuses on the Valerie Plame affair and its implications for reporters’ ability to protect their sources. Here’s the gist: when the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from Judith Miller of the New York Times and Matt Cooper of Time, who were contesting special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s request that they testify in the Plame case, it toppled a precarious tradition of reporter-source confidentiality in one fell swoop.

That story alone is worth telling — but the first episode of News War also offers a searing indictment of the complicity of the press in the run-up to the Iraq War. The highlight, if that’s the right term, is this exchange between Frontline’s Lowell Bergman and the Washington Post’s Bob Woodward, which starts with Woodward condemning Miller’s now-discredited reporting on Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction.

WOODWARD: She had the wrong sources. . . . If your sources are wrong, you’re wrong. And you have to accept responsibility.
BERGMAN: You believed there was WMD in Iraq.
WOODWARD: I did.
BERGMAN: You said as much publicly.
WOODWARD: Yes.
Cue tape of Larry King interviewing Woodward prior to the invasion.
CALLER: What happens if we go to war against Iraq and we knock ’em right out, and we find no weapons of mass destruction?
WOODWARD: I think the chance of that happening is about zero. There’s just too much there.

If you’re looking for journalistic heroes, they’re hard to come by here. But that doesn’t render the government’s increasing aggression toward the press any less troubling. Watch, and be dismayed.

Related: Pressing the case, S.O.S. in the Biggest Little, Legislature moves to protect Maine journalists, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Politics, Domestic Policy, Political Policy,  More more >
| More

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 02/15 ]   The Addams Family  @ Shubert Theatre
[ 02/15 ]   "Aphrodite and the Gods of Love"  @ Museum of Fine Arts
[ 02/15 ]   Green Eyes  @ Ames Hotel
ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed