Will sore losers spoil the Democratic hope for change?
By MARY ANN SORRENTINO | February 13, 2008
As Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama continue in a fight-to-the-finish, the debate over the value of the Electoral College system again gathers steam.
Currently, Democratic delegates are won based on voter percentages, not ballots cast. More distressing, “superdelegates” are free to vote as they please.
Democrats are about to select either the first woman or the first black presidential nominee. Followers of both candidates are deeply committed. Women who remember a lifetime of sexism in lost opportunities and exclusion tend to support Clinton. The same is true of the mainstream mainly white Democratic establishment, and of the Latinos who love the Clintons and sometimes feel overshadowed by blacks.
Obama, conversely, has tremendous support among African-Americans, archliberals, and young voters, all of whom work tirelessly for his cause. Such a passionate following sparks more energy than Clinton’s traditional gang, and it may make the difference for him.
Obama — always mesmerizing — often uses what some might see as the language of entitlement. With every step closer to possible victory, he invokes a vague “we” whose “time has come.” On Super Tuesday, he finally said, “We are the ones we have been waiting for.”
“We,” who?
The long-avoided race card is now subtly played by both sides. This is in line with how ethnic minorities have in the past lined up behind “one of their own.” Though few are willing to articulate this, blacks for Obama are no different than Irish for Kennedy or Italians for Cuomo.
When Obama speaks of so many small contributions, such as the $3 money order mailed in by a Southern elder, he is talking — at least in part — about a black person voting for another black person.
In the end, voters will have “chosen” a bunch of political regulars who, between visits to “hospitality suites,” may still select the nominee. While this process initially favored Clinton, who clearly has more political chits to call in, it’s noteworthy when someone such as Provi¬dence native Tad Devine, a leading Democratic consultant in DC, uses a New York Times op-ed — as he did last Sunday — to encourage superdelegates to delay their decision-making.
Polls by CNN and the Washington Post show that if Obama is the nominee, Clinton supporters will be willing, and even happy, to rally behind this capable, charismatic candidate touting “change we can believe in.” The same polls say Obama supporters will get behind the brilliant, hard-working Senator Clinton if she is chosen.
Yet while it might seem unlikely at the moment, one wonders, how will black America react if Obama is “passed over,” and if Clinton gets the nod via a politically tainted and obtuse system?
Oprah, Jesse Jackson, and black scholars may be angry and vocal, but they will eventually surrender to the pecking order that has always defined political reality.
But will aggrieved individuals, including some of those who cheered O.J. Simpson’s acquittal because, finally, they beat “the man,” be physical or philosophical?
In the end, the demeanor of the losers, regardless of who gets the Democratic nomination, will test one “change” that we would all like to believe in.
Related:
Beyond the spin, Civil war, Breaking the press, More 
- Beyond the spin
The day after Barack Obama inched ahead of challenger Hillary Clinton in the superdelegate count, the indefatigable Clinton won the West Virginia primary.
- Civil war
The whole Democratic race is still only two steps away from becoming a train wreck that could derail the party’s chances of winning in November.
- Breaking the press
The narrative of this campaign was supposed to be how a triumphant Obama rode discontent against the Bush administration to an overwhelming victory.
- On the national affront
Where does one begin to recap 12 months of such willful self-parody?
- Rhode Island: Vote for Obama
The 2008 election is guaranteed to enjoy a special place in history.
- The rats in Romney’s corner
Mitt Romney’s powerhouse first-quarter fundraising numbers — he reports to have taken in more than $20 million — got him all kinds of press attention.
- Giant step
Two weeks ago we noted that, in spite of all the press hype promoting Barack Obama, the Democrats were only two steps away from chaos in their nomination process.
- Emasculation proclamation
Though the press and Barack Obama supporters often maintain the opposite, by the rough-and-tumble standards of American politics, Hillary Clinton really hasn’t run that tough a campaign against the Illinois senator.
- Clinton’s ‘kitchen-sink’ strategy could yield Pyrrhic victory
Many Democrats, it seems safe to say, never thought a Democrat, let alone Hillary Clinton, would use a similar tactic.
- Obama’s Rhode Island followers mull the primary fallout
There were the makings of a celebration as the What Cheer? Brigade unleashed its joyous cacophony amid hundreds of Barack Obama supporters.
- More rules for pols
Well, there are less than 21 months before the election, and the “Tote Board” is already computing the odds.
- Less
Topics:
This Just In
, Barack Obama, Elections and Voting, Politics, More
, Barack Obama, Elections and Voting, Politics, U.S. Politics, U.S. Presidential Election, Special Interest Groups, African-American Issues, Racial Issues, Social Issues, Hillary Clinton, Less
