The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
Best2012Vote-1000x50

Text of the same-sex marriage bill

Key sections from "An Act To End Discrimination in Civil Marriage and Affirm Religious Freedom"
By JEFF INGLIS  |  March 25, 2009

Language and careful word choice are important in this discussion. Here is the full official legislative summary of the bill that would legalize same-sex marriage and key excerpts (with explanations) from its legal language. Read the full text of the bill here

"Separate is not equal: Many state benefits, and federal ones, too, are tied specifically to 'marriage'"  by Deirdre Fulton.

"The text of the bill | Key sections from 'An Act To End Discrimination in Civil Marriage and Affirm Religious Freedom'" by Jeff Inglis.

The legislative summary
This bill repeals the provision that limits marriage to one man and one woman and replaces it with the authorization for marriage between any 2 persons that meet the other requirements of Maine law. It also specifies that a marriage between 2 people of the same sex in another state that is valid in that state is valid and must be recognized in this State.

This bill also clarifies that the authorization of marriage between 2 people of the same sex does not compel any religious institution to alter its doctrine, policy or teaching regarding marriage or to solemnize any marriage in conflict with that doctrine, policy or teaching. It also specifies that a person authorized to join persons in marriage and who fails or refuses to join persons in marriage is not subject to any fine or other penalty for such failure or refusal.

The legal language, explained
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows:

 Sec. 1. 19-A MRSA §650, as enacted by PL 1997, c. 65, §2, is repealed.
Repeals the "Maine Defense of Marriage Act," which specifies that the legal definition of "marriage" is "the union of one man and one woman."

• Sec. 2. 19-A MRSA §650-A is enacted to read: § 650-A. Codification of marriage: Marriage is the legally recognized union of 2 people. Gender-specific terms relating to the marital relationship or familial relationships, including, but not limited to, "spouse," "family," "marriage," "immediate family," "dependent," "next of kin," "bride," "groom," "husband," "wife," "widow" and "widower," must be construed to be gender-neutral for all purposes throughout the law, whether in the context of statute, administrative or court rule, policy, common law or any other source of civil law.
Replaces the previous definition with a new legal definition of marriage as "the legally recognized union of 2 people."

•Sec. 3. 19-A MRSA §650-B is enacted to read: § 650-B. Recognition of marriage licensed and certified in another jurisdiction: A marriage of a same-sex couple that is validly licensed and certified in another jurisdiction is recognized for all purposes under the laws of this State.
All marriages from other states and countries, whether same-sex or heterosexual, are automatically recognized in Maine.

• Sec. 4. 19-A MRSA §651, sub-§2, as amended by PL 1997, c. 537, §12 and affected by §62, is further amended to include the sentence: The application may be issued to any 2 persons otherwise qualified under this chapter regardless of the sex of each person.
Specifically states that the gender of the two people seeking a marriage application is not a criterion for their eligibility.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Jubilation!, A deadly move against same-sex marriage, Don't be spooked, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Culture and Lifestyle, GLBT Issues, Special Interest Groups,  More more >
| More

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 02/15 ]   The Addams Family  @ Shubert Theatre
[ 02/15 ]   "Aphrodite and the Gods of Love"  @ Museum of Fine Arts
[ 02/15 ]   Green Eyes  @ Ames Hotel
ARTICLES BY JEFF INGLIS
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   AS ENCAMPMENT FADES, PROTEST SHIFTS BACK TO CORE ISSUES  |  February 08, 2012
    Even as Portland city officials continue to pressure OccupyMaine to leave Lincoln Park, they have done the Occupation a great favor, perhaps unintentionally.
  •   QUESTION AUTHORITY  |  February 08, 2012
    Maine journalists appear to disbelieve their own eyes, decline to do their own research, and prefer to quote officials instead of relying on independent knowledge and experience.
  •   CITIZENS OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORT OCCUPY ENCAMPMENT  |  February 01, 2012
    As OccupyMaine's request to stay in Lincoln Park is considered by a Maine judge, it appears the Portland City Council's decisions (which the judge is reviewing) were based more on individual councilors' views and less on constituent complaints than elected officials have let on.
  •   SIGN CONUNDRUM CONTINUES; MONUMENTS 'JOIN' MOVEMENT  |  January 25, 2012
    The mystery of where OccupyMaine's signs went is partially solved: it turns out their removal was witnessed — and by a police officer!
  •   WHITE HOUSE PANS SOPA  |  January 18, 2012
    Maine's congressional delegation appears to be in a holding pattern while attempting to form positions on two bills that address widespread copyright and trademark violations via the Internet.

 See all articles by: JEFF INGLIS

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed