Mind games

By BILL RODRIGUEZ  |  July 16, 2008

So Proof becomes as much about how subjective validation can become when the evidence is about people rather than numbers. Catherine can’t prove she authored the proof — Claire has common-sense reasons to be dubious — without earning some faith in herself.

Most of the performances are persuasive about the characters and their relationships, especially Hughes and Luzitano as the sisters, whose siblingfriction establishes some realistic sparks. As the ambitious grad student, Connors goes for a nervous dweebishness that makes plausible that Hal is hapless rather than scheming. Zinger is often hesitant with Robert’s lines, interrupting the flow, but his presence as a vague and absent-minded professor is basically convincing.

This production, directed by Peter Wright, may not satisfy everyone who has seen the play before and thereby is more interested in the performances than in the plot. But newcomers to Auburn’s intriguing story will likely be carried along.


< prev  1  |  2  | 
  Topics: Theater , Science and Technology, Sciences, University of Chicago,  More more >
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVIEW: LOS ANDES  |  April 23, 2014
    There is a certain seraphic smile that spreads onto the face of someone approaching a favorite restaurant that he hasn’t indulged in for a long while.
  •   JAILHOUSE ROMP  |  April 23, 2014
    Come on, ’fess up. In your heart of hearts, you get a little tabloid thrill over a bang-bang jealous-lover news account.
  •   MEN AT WORK  |  April 16, 2014
    The Pulitzer Prize Board, which likes to honor theatrical gems of Americana, may have been remiss in not nominating David Rabe’s 1984 ' Hurlyburly .'
  •   SEARCHING FOR CLUES  |  April 09, 2014
    A "girl detective" makes her  world premiere.
  •   ROSE-COLORED MEMORIES  |  April 09, 2014
    Incessant media accounts of horrific events can prompt compassion fatigue.

 See all articles by: BILL RODRIGUEZ