The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
Features  |  Reviews
Best2012Vote-1000x50

Interview: Raoul Coutard

Breathless anticipation
By PETER KEOUGH  |  July 7, 2010

1008_coutard_amina

REVIEW: Breathless at 50. By Jeffrey Gantz.
It's embarrassing to confess, but the first time I went to see Breathless, I walked out after 20 minutes. I was 14, and it seemed clear to me that Jean-Luc Godard didn't know what the hell he was doing. I've since come around to acknowledging the film as a masterpiece, but many people have felt the same way about it, especially when it first came out in 1960. Yet the fact remains that Breathless (and, to a lesser extent, François Truffaut's The 400 Blows, from the year before) changed the way movies would be made, and seen, forever.

For the film's 50th anniversary, a new restored version is being released, and one of those in on the project is its cinematographer, Raoul Coutard, as much an icon in his way as Godard himself. He collaborated with Godard on another 16 films, and he worked with Truffaut on four, so you could see him, along with actor Jean-Pierre Léaud, as the link between the Lennon and the McCartney of the Nouvelle Vague.

Here are some thoughts from one of the great artists of the 20th century on changing the future of world cinema.

You collaborated on this 50th-anniversary restoration ofBreathless. How did that come about, and what did it entail?
My role in the restoration was as a calibrator. The films and the printing machines no longer being the same, there could have been disparities in the correspondence with the original, which is a half-century old.

When you were shootingBreathless, did you ever think that in 50 years people would regard it as a turning point in cinema?
When we were shooting the film, we were all curious to see the finished product, but no one thought of it as a benchmark or a cult film.

What were your impressions of Jean Seberg and Jean-Paul Belmondo? Can you comment on Seberg's suicide in 1979, when she was shooting your filmOperation Leopard?
Jean-Paul Belmondo made no impression on me because he was unknown — Breathless allowed him to show his talent and to become a star. Jean Seberg, on the other hand, was "denationalized" — she had just made a big US machine of a film, and now she finds herself on a ridiculously small crew, where the scenario is written from day to day. It was very difficult for her.

Jean was making her last film with Operation Leopard. I had not the least idea as to the reason for her suicide. During the shooting, she seemed at ease.

What were some of the more unconventional demands Godard made during the production ofBreathless?
JLG wanted to demonstrate that it was possible to make films "differently." To cut cost by reducing the crew was the way — since this was a documentary about an individual — to shoot the film as reportage, camera in hand, without lighting, since portable lighting did not yet exist. No sound, either — portable synchronization did not yet exist.

You worked with Godard up throughWeek-End and then not again until the '80s, withPassion. Was there a falling out? How did you get back together? What is your relationship now?
I didn't work with Jean-Luc for 10 years because he had the revelation that he was a Marxist-Leninist and that he therefore could not make films with capitalist money. I think it took him less than 10 years to realize that without that money, no films are possible, but he had to make that turn.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Shock and awe, Review: Two in the Wave, Review: Singularity, More more >
  Topics: Features , Francois Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard, BREATHLESS
| More

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 02/12 ]   69˚S [The Shackleton Project]  @ Paramount Theatre
[ 02/12 ]   Boston Lyric Opera conducted by David Angus  @ John F. Kennedy Library and Museum
[ 02/12 ]   Stephen Petronio Company  @ Institute of Contemporary Art
ARTICLES BY PETER KEOUGH
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVIEW: THE OSCAR NOMINATED SHORT FILMS 2012: DOCUMENTARY  |  February 10, 2012
    The films in this program contain some of the most powerful images to be seen on the screen this year.
  •   REVIEW: JOURNEY 2: THE MYSTERIOUS ISLAND  |  February 07, 2012
    I liked the tiny elephants and the Rock bouncing berries off his pecs, but Brad Peyton's sequel is as bad as the 2008 original.
  •   REVIEW: CHRONICLE  |  February 02, 2012
    Poor Andrew (Dane DeHaan) has more problems than any movie teenager deserves.
  •   REVIEW: ONE FOR THE MONEY  |  January 31, 2012
    TV director Julie Anne Robinson's insipid adaptation of this first volume in Janet Evanovich's Stephanie Plum series has more in common with Young Adult than with the average gumshoe yarn.
  •   REVIEW: BIG MIRACLE  |  January 31, 2012
    Taking a tip from the oil industry, Hollywood has started exploiting Alaska. Following in the tracks of The Grey is Ken Kwapis's take on a true story from 1988 about an effort to save gray whales trapped in the Arctic ice. Surprisingly, the film offers genuine complexity.

 See all articles by: PETER KEOUGH

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed