The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
Features  |  Reviews
Best2012Vote-1000x50

EXCERPT: The Conversation

Peter Keough discusses how The Conversation  is a B List movie.
By PETER KEOUGH  |  October 31, 2008

The Conversation
Francis Ford Coppola, 1974

How does The Conversation qualify as a B movie? Traditionally, the term B-Movie refers to those cheap, readily accessible, generally lurid exploitation films from pulpy genres designed to fill the second billing for the main feature. The Conversation, meanwhile, defies genre, frustrates narrative expectations and challenges and sometimes alienates viewers. It is subtle, complex, stark, fugue like, self-conscious and utterly ambitious. It was, however, cheap, or at least initially. Otherwise, it would seem to be the opposite of a B-Movie

Francis Ford Coppola would be the one to know, having spent the first three years or so of his career making B-Movies, getting his first directorial credits with films like the German produced The Bellboy and the Playgirls (perhaps it sounds better in German: Mit Eva fing die Sünde an), made in 3-D in 1962 (“In COLOR plus the new depth perception…it puts the girls right in your lap!”) and the legendary Dementia 13 for Roger Corman in 1963.

But in 1972, when The Conversation went into production, Francis Ford Coppola was the most powerful filmmaker in Hollywood. The Godfather was making more money than any picture since Gone With the Wind and had won three Oscars, including Best Picture. The film’s success intoxicated Coppola with dreams of artistic grandeur, but the process of making it had struck him as frustrating and demeaning. Making a big budget film for a mass audience, adapting another writer’s bestselling potboiler, working under the neurotic oversight of an oppressive corporate studio like Paramount — this did not fulfill his dream of being an auteur. The Godfather — ranked number two, just below the perennial Citizen Kane, on the American Film Institute’s list on the 100 greatest Hollywood movies of all time — was not exactly a B movie, but it was a kind of work for hire, perhaps an immensely more successful Finian’s Rainbow. But it did allow Coppola to make a film worthy of his talent and artistic vision. A film like The Conversation.

That probably wasn’t how Paramount regarded The Conversation, however. For them it was a necessary investment (budgeted at around $1 million) to placate their genius director and make sure he followed through with the sequel to the astoundingly lucrative Godfather. In a sense, The Conversation was a new kind of B picture, one that would catch on in subsequent decades: a cheaply made auteurist indulgence made to stroke a talented, independent-minded director’s ego in the gap between genuine, money-making features.

This new kind of B picture, then, was an intensely personal expression of the filmmaker’s soul. As such it would include homages to the works auteurs, in this case Michelangelo Antonioni’s Blow Up, which Coppola acknowledges as an inspiration. Despite that pervasive influence (one scene in particular is a dishearteningly direct rip-off), The Conversation, certainly when seenin retrospect and in the context of Coppola’s subsequent career, is so personal as to be almost solipsistically self-reflexive.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Hanging with The Hurt Locker, Keough sweeps Oscars, B List rewind, More more >
  Topics: Features , Entertainment, Movies, Francis Ford Coppola,  More more >
| More

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 02/19 ]   The Addams Family  @ Shubert Theatre
[ 02/19 ]   American Lamb Jam Tour  @ Charles Hotel
[ 02/19 ]   Boston Ballet in "Simply Sublime"  @ Opera House
ARTICLES BY PETER KEOUGH
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVIEW: CORIOLANUS  |  February 16, 2012
    In a line of fascist-style stagings of the Bard from Orson Welles's 1937 black-shirted Julius Caesar to Richard Loncraine's brown-shirted Richard III (1998), Ralph Fiennes sets his lean and hungry take on Shakespeare's tragedy in a mo dern-day war zone, paring the play to a brisk two hours.
  •   REVIEW: SAFE HOUSE  |  February 15, 2012
    Daniel Espinosa's over-edited but engaging spy thriller delves into edgy territory untouched by any of the numerous movies it imitates: it has Brendan Gleeson do an American accent.
  •   REVIEW: THE SECRET WORLD OF ARRIETTY  |  February 15, 2012
    The most touching love story and best children's movie in a long time, Hiromasa Yonebayashi's adaptation of Mary Norton's book The Borrowers employs old-fashioned animation techniques to create a world that is familiar, uncanny, and luminous.
  •   REVIEW: RAMPART  |  February 15, 2012
    The rotten cop flick has become a mini-genre of sorts, a subset of noir, going back at least to Orson Welles's Touch of Evil .
  •   REVIEW: THE OSCAR NOMINATED SHORT FILMS 2012: DOCUMENTARY  |  February 10, 2012
    The films in this program contain some of the most powerful images to be seen on the screen this year.

 See all articles by: PETER KEOUGH

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed