The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
WFNX_1000x50g

''Holy war'' holes

Letters to the Boston editor, August 13, 2010
By BOSTON PHOENIX LETTERS  |  August 11, 2010

I’m as liberal as the next guy, and I’ve been bothered for years by the distorted values and activities of the religious right in their pursuit of enforced conformity. I enjoyed Jeff Inglis’s article, “Holy War,” in the June 25 edition of the Phoenix, but find myself perturbed nevertheless. Perhaps my liberal knee is jerking.

As pointed out, the Constitution prohibits governmental involvement in religion, but not religious advocacy of social positions. This is often forgotten. Any attempt to withdraw tax exemptions from such organizations because of the actions they take could be injurious to the First Amendment. It’s based all too much on our agreement with the position the churches are advocating.

The civil-rights movement of the 1950s and ’60s and the Vietnam War protests would not have been nearly as successful without the principled involvement of many religious groups and individuals. Tax a church for funding homophobic legislative efforts and you will also find yourself taxing churches who join the Pride march to endorse gay marriage.

I have no solution to the genuine problem posed by Mr. Inglis, except to remember the old adage that the best solution to free speech is more free speech.

James Bodge
Somerville

I usually like Jeff Inglis’s work, but here he took an interesting theme off track with offensive name-calling. And if he wants to quote founders on the role of religion in a democracy, he could have included George Washington (“Reason and experience forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles”) or Thomas Jefferson (“Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that their liberties are a gift from God?”).

Dennis Duffy
Boston


CORRECTION
In our “On the Cheap” review of Olecito, we incorrectly stated that tacos were two for $2.75. In fact, they are $2.75 each.

Related: A casket gets some airtime, Return to sender, Go frock yourself!, More more >
  Topics: Letters , Religion, Mormonism, dining,  More more >
| More

ARTICLES BY BOSTON PHOENIX LETTERS
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BACK TO THE FUTURE + IT'S IN THE CARDS (NSFW)  |  May 30, 2012
    I'm a lifelong music fan and DJ (radio and club) and I have to admit I feel like Daniel Brockman's blog post (see "The Problem with the Future of Music: Amanda Palmer and the rise of the music biz Super PAC," thePhoenix.com, May 3) has been beamed in from bizarro land.
  •   GONE FOREVER  |  May 23, 2012
    Although I could spend this opportunity ranting and raving about the sale of WFNX to Clear Channel, I'd like to take the opportunity to thank WFNX .  
  •   SPOILER ALERT  |  May 16, 2012
    I took issue with the final statement of Peter Keough's review of The Avengers ("Awkward First Steps," Arts & Entertainment, May 4) — with his dismissal of Agent Phil Coulson's death as not "compelling" enough to rally a group of heroes into action.
  •   THE FUTURE -- FOR SOME  |  May 09, 2012
    I think Amanda Palmer missed the reason she has such a broad, wide, and fervent fan base is because she was on Roadrunner in the first place.
  •   FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION  |  May 02, 2012
    I'm curious about the inconsistency of the 2012 Boston Phoenix ballot for Best Trivia Night.

 See all articles by: BOSTON PHOENIX LETTERS



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2012 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group