Vote for casinos in Maine

By AL DIAMON  |  October 20, 2010

As for a tribal casino in sparsely populated Washington County, it would offer all the marketing potential of a new-car dealership in Amish country.

Seasonal gaming sites might crop up along the coast in the summer or at ski resorts in the winter, but the limited time they'd be open, plus the competition they'd face from the attractions of the beach or slopes, would almost certainly keep such enterprises small and marginally profitable.

The gambling industry prefers to operate as a monopoly. It doesn't want to fight with itself for customers. That's why the Oxford referendum on next month's ballot contains language that would prevent another casino from opening within 100 miles of its site. That's why supporters of a Lewiston gaming establishment took out a full-page newspaper ad recently urging a "no" vote on the Oxford plan. That's why Hollywood Slots' parent company is underwriting the cost of an anti-Oxford campaign, arguing, in effect, that another gambling site would hurt its business.

If any idiot could open a casino simply by stopping by town hall to pick up a building permit and an entertainment license, almost nobody would do it. The battle to attract players would be too fierce. The customer base would be too fractured. The profits would be nonexistent.

The easiest way to limit gambling in Maine as much as possible isn't to oppose every casino referendum that comes along. It's to vote to legalize games of chance every chance you get.

Unlike playing the slots, it's a sure bet.

Lay your cards on the table by e-mailing me ataldiamon@herniahill.net.

< prev  1  |  2  | 
Related: Caprio's Clinton fixation, Seeking the State House, Conducting tests on Maine Republicans, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Maine, Gambling, casinos,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
ARTICLES BY AL DIAMON
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   GIVE ME AN F  |  May 23, 2013
    I was educated in Maine public schools. Here's what I learned:  
  •   CHANGE FOR THE BETTER  |  May 16, 2013
    The trouble with tax reform is that almost everybody not named Warren Buffett believes it should result in their personal tax bill going down.
  •   I DON'T KNOW WHERE I STAND  |  May 09, 2013
    When it comes to sex, there's something ambivalent about Michael Michaud. No, not that. I mean Michaud's position on abortion.
  •   THE PRICE YOU PAY(1)  |  May 03, 2013
    Politics + other mistakes
  •   ADDICTED TO BAD IDEAS(1)  |  April 24, 2013
    Due process isn't pretty. Or convenient. Or even fair. All those rules that are supposed to assure both employers and employees they'll be getting an unbiased hearing can easily result in businesses losing some they probably should have won.

 See all articles by: AL DIAMON