In the end, it seems to me that an argument could be made that Tisei should have renounced his claim to half of the house. It was, after all, the result of an unintended clerical error. He had paid nothing for it. He knew that, by taking the money, he was denying it to people whom his parents had been judged to have wronged.

Tisei, in other words, knew exactly how he was benefitting, and at whose expense. He also knew what wrongdoing his parents were found to have done.

Tierney, by contrast, has not been shown to have known that his wife was accepting money from her brothers, or that he knew the brothers were engaged in wrongdoing until charges were later brought against them.

Tisei rejects any comparison with Tierney's association with his brothers-in-law, who he says were known criminals.

He may be right, and the comparison may be a stretch.

But I think there is something similar, too. Tisei seems like he didn't want to get involved in the dealings of his father, who separated from Beverly Tisei in 1991 — any more than Tierney wanted to get involved in the dealings of his new in-laws, after he married Patrice in 1997.

The two experiences could be apples and oranges.

But those fruits might both look familiar to many voters, who will ultimately be the judge.

To read the Talking Politics blog, go to David S. Bernstein can be reached at Follow him on Twitter @dbernstein.

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  | 
Related: How 'three strikes' legislation fails, Boston's last congressman?, It's Mitt & Scott's Party Now, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Politics, tisei, mass poli
| More

Most Popular
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MRS. WARREN GOES TO WASHINGTON  |  March 21, 2013
    Elizabeth Warren was the only senator on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, aside from the chair and ranking minority, to show up at last Thursday's hearing on indexing the minimum wage to inflation.
  •   MARCH MADNESS  |  March 12, 2013
    It's no surprise that the coming weekend's Saint Patrick's Day celebrations have become politically charged, given the extraordinary convergence of electoral events visiting South Boston.
  •   LABOR'S LOVE LOST  |  March 08, 2013
    Steve Lynch is winning back much of the union support that left him in 2009.
  •   AFTER MARKEY, GET SET, GO  |  February 20, 2013
    It's a matter of political decorum: when an officeholder is running for higher office, you wait until the election has been won before publicly coveting the resulting vacancy.
    It wasn't just that Scott Brown announced he was not running in the special US Senate election — it was that it quickly became evident that he was not handing the job off to another Republican.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN