Is the bloom off the Turd?

Karl Rove does New Hampshire
By ADAM REILLY  |  June 14, 2006

060616_rove_main2
IN BLOOM: Are Karl Rove's days as the architect of GOP dominance numbered?
MANCHESTER, NH — Karl Rove was in trouble. Or so it seemed just a few days ago, when the Man Liberals Love to Hate trekked to New Hampshire to address the state’s GOP. According to recent polls, President George W. Bush — whose career Rove masterminded — hasn’t exactly been dazzling the American public in his second term. In turn, Rove may have dropped in the president’s estimation: earlier this year, following the death of Social Security reform and the disastrous federal response to Hurricane Katrina, Rove lost his domestic-policy portfolio in a White House shakeup. Worse, when Rove arrived in the Granite State, he still faced possible indictment for his role in the Valerie Plame case. And if the GOP loses control of the US House or Senate this fall, Rove’s dream of building a permanent Republican majority could be shattered.

Considering the precarious state of Rove’s career, his appearance at the New Hampshire GOP’s annual dinner was oddly low-key. He was loose and confident, thanks, perhaps, to the news (made public the next morning) that he wouldn’t be charged in connection with the Plame case. Meanwhile, a handful of anti-Rove protesters across the street from the Manchester Radisson — KARL ROVE 666, one sign read — seemed to be going through the motions. Case in point: Susan Bruce held a placard demanding jail time for Rove, but didn’t think it would actually happen. (Good instinct, Susan.) “We have hope,” she said with cheerful resignation. “Hope springs eternal!”

And it was bipartisan, this assumption that Rove wasn’t really in any serious political danger. “Putting him on the political side, I think, was a brilliant strategic move,” said New Hampshire GOP chairman Wayne Semprini, dismissing the notion that Rove’s changed White House responsibilities marked some kind of demotion. “And if there are issues that he needs to address, I’m sure” — cue wry smile — “I’m sure he has plenty of access.”

Not as advertised
Bruce and Semprini are hardly objective observers, of course. Republicans need to believe Rove can rescue the party from its assorted debacles (Iraq, DeLay, Abramoff, Plame) and guide it to victory in November’s midterm elections. And for their part, Democrats may need Rove even more. Ever since he orchestrated Bush’s dubious 2000 win, the man the president dubs “Turd Blossom” has played a key role in the collective Democratic psyche. If Rove’s really the evil political genius he’s made out to be, then losing twice to Bush stings a bit less. Even better, Rove lets Democrats pretend that their party’s recent failures don’t herald a deeper political crisis. Instead, they can conclude that Democrats just need to find a Rove of their own.

But enough political psychologizing. Whatever needs the Myth of Rove satisfies for Republicans and Democrats, it’s very difficult — after hearing his half-hour speech Monday night — to doubt that Turd Blossom will survive his various trials and enjoy the last laugh.

Watching Rove in person for the first time is slightly jarring. If you’ve read enough tributes to Rove’s political savvy, you expect a wonkish, slightly awkward man whose freakishly keen brain — tucked into an oversize bald pate topped with that wispy tuft of hair — is his one great asset.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Whatever happened to Danville's giant mystery monkey?, Review: Fair Game, W. gets a B, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Politics, George Bush, U.S. Politics,  More more >
| More


Most Popular
More Information
He be jamming?
Karl Rove’s out of the woods as far as Plamegate is concerned. But what about the New Hampshire phone-jamming scandal, which involved obstruction of Democratic get-out-the-vote efforts in 2002 and had already led to the conviction of three GOP operatives? “The idea that you would have a phone-jamming operation without Rove’s knowledge or possibly his active involvement is virtually impossible,” says Wayne Slater, co-author of Bush’s Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential. “But what’s also known is, it would be very difficult to prove that — and Karl’s whole record is really to hide that kind of involvement.” On Monday, in Manchester, Rove declined comment on the phone-jamming case.
ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BULLY FOR BU!  |  March 12, 2010
    After six years at the Phoenix , I recently got my first pre-emptive libel threat. It came, most unexpectedly, from an investigative reporter. And beyond the fact that this struck me as a blatant attempt at intimidation, it demonstrated how tricky journalism's new, collaboration-driven future could be.
  •   STOP THE QUINN-SANITY!  |  March 03, 2010
    The year is still young, but when the time comes to look back at 2010's media lowlights, the embarrassing demise of Sally Quinn's Washington Post column, "The Party," will almost certainly rank near the top of the list.
  •   RIGHT CLICK  |  February 19, 2010
    Back in February 2007, a few months after a political neophyte named Deval Patrick cruised to victory in the Massachusetts governor's race with help from a political blog named Blue Mass Group (BMG) — which whipped up pro-Patrick sentiment while aggressively rebutting the governor-to-be's critics — I sized up a recent conservative entry in the local blogosphere.
  •   RANSOM NOTES  |  February 12, 2010
    While reporting from Afghanistan two years ago, David Rohde became, for the second time in his career, an unwilling participant rather than an observer. On October 29, 1995, Rohde had been arrested by Bosnian Serbs. And then in November 2008, Rohde and two Afghan colleagues were en route to an interview with a Taliban commander when they were kidnapped.
  •   POOR RECEPTION  |  February 08, 2010
    The right loves to rant against the "liberal-media elite," but there's one key media sector where the conservative id reigns supreme: talk radio.

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY